Political change

How did the structure of the parties change and can this be linked to the reform acts?

1832-

Yes it did change politics

  • Decline of royal patronage- governments relied on party organisation in parliament- 1834 William IV dismissed government and invited Peel to form government- well short of majority in Jan 1835 election but was made PM_ repeatedly defeated- William IV forced to recall Melbourne
  • Organisation in constituencies developed- politicians realised importance of ensuring supporters registered as voters- post 1832- organisation normally left to part time voluntary agents
  • More central coordination of policy and strategy- establishment of political clubs- Whigs established Reform Clubs- Tories founded Carlton Club- no involvement of ordinary party supporters
  • More contested elections after 1832- voters more influence over composition of the House of Commons- General Elections became means by which governments were chosen- public opinion became more important factor in political calculations- since 1714 no general election had resulted in a change of government-monarch had final say- in 1841 first time in over 100 years that government with working majority was replaced by another through verdict of people
  • Encouraged creation of culture of reform responding to public pressure-
  • MP’s now had more work to do- parliamentary year expanded significantly
  • 1832- 67- development of 2 party system-
  • Widening electorate meant parties had to broaden basis of support- Peel Tamworth manifesto- attempt to reposition Tory Party- embrace cautious reform- increasingly used name Conservatives- gained support from moderate classes, particularly manufacturers and businessmen

No 

  • Whigs alliance with Irish catholic mP’s an radicals- formalised in Lichfield House Compact- Liberal Party- Whigs remained thoroughly aristocratic group who dominated Liberal government- belief in reforming in order to conserve- pace of reform was too slow for radical element in Lib alliances
  • Regularity with which governments debated on crucial votes in Parliament reflected the looseness of party discipline among MP’s at this time
  • Fewer working class voters after 1832 than before due to irregularities in voting rules
  • Key aim of 1832 to side middle class with ruling classes Mid 19th century- partnership between landowning and business interest- alliance between Whig aristocrats and middle class radicals- foundation of emerging Liberal party
  • Leadership, control of policy and social composition of MP’s changed very little from 1832- 1867 Reform Act
  • Major aim of 1832- preserve influence of aristocracy over political process
  • Post 1832- old nation dominated Westminster- however outside parliament Liberal politics had different complexion- more radical flavour
  • Agriculture returned to prosperity in 1850’ss- landowners continued to thrive- look at list of PM’s dominated by landowners
  • Same parties
Join now!

1867-

Yes 

  • Creation of modern political party
  • Parties recognised key to success at borough elections- efficiency of organisation at constituency level- after 1867
  • 1867- extension of suffrage so large that old methods of influence no longer applicable- need to connect and meet supporters- Gladstone’s Midlothian campaign, Disraeli’s one Nation toryism-1880- Pugh states that it is the first modern election- 84% seats contested- Liberal leader Gladstone held national campaign- clear cut choice between policies of parties
  • Propaganda and persuasion took place of influence- too many voters to bribe Gladstone by end of 1870’s meet the people speaking ...

This is a preview of the whole essay