• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Rise and Rule of Stalin and Hitler

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Rise and Rule of Single Party States Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler "It was the circumstances not personalities that brought rulers of single party states to power." Introduction: In Europe, many single party rulers emerged in 19th century. Joseph Stalin in Russia and Adolf Hitler from Germany, were two of many dictators which made up the European history and it's obvious that without them, whole European History, and in fact history of the whole world would be totally different from what we know. Since both of these dictators established their power, the European history became the result of perfect blend of leader's personality and events which happened at that time. It is more likely that leadership took a minor part, and other factors (circumstances) are the one which actually allowed these leaders to seize power. Stalin: A charismatic leader of a manipulator? Joseph Stalin became the next leader of single party states in USSR after Lenin died. He was a "grey blur" whom no one ever notices his presence before he came to power. Lenin was a charismatic leader whom worked together with Trotsky to win the October Revolution. Many people thought that Trotsky was the one who was going to replace Lenin. ...read more.

Middle

He meticulously thought about delaying the collectivization and the result was satisfactory: By the end of February 1930, half of peasant household had been collectivized. Thus, it can be concluded that Stalin's personality did bring him to become a dictator, but the circumstances were the 'decisive' factors which made Stalin the dictator of a single party state in USSR. Hitler: The central controller or a clever situation adaptor? Adolf Hitler has a different characteristic from Stalin. He was an Austrian, who served the German military during WWI. Different from Stalin whom had clear Marxist ideology but no clear principle, he had vague ideology of Nazism but he had clear principles in which became the fundamental base of his leadership and they way he ruled the single party state. There were anti Semitism and racial supremacy, Lebensraum, Anti-democracy, and F´┐Żhrerprinzip. Intentionalist historians argue that everything happened was a part of Hitler's 'master plan' to establish his power. He had ambitions, for sure, and he was enthusiastic and capable of achieving it. Hitler was a great leader; he was a great 'elocutionist', a great manipulator, a great organizer and a great strategist. Otto Strasser mentioned in his book, Hitler and I, in 1940 that "..and he is promptly transformed into one of the greatest speakers of the century." ...read more.

Conclusion

Nazism was an emotional response to a crisis happening at that time. Luck also followed Hitler on the way towards his chancellorship. The 5 years imprisonment changed to 10 months sentence, weakening of Weimar Republic, and Papen. Papen was the one who recommended Hindenburg to put Hitler in the chancellorship position. If Hindenburg sticked to his decision to make Papen as the chancellor, no matter how good Hitler's future planning was, won't have any meaning. There were also other dictators which started to gain power in Europe. Stalin-USSR, Mussolini-Italy and Franco-Spain due to WWI. His rise to power was lighted by other dictator's success which encouraged him to do the same. It's arguable that his personality played the minor part of the whole play. Conclusion: Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler were two of dictators in Europe. Even though they had a different background and ideology, some common links could be found in them: They had ambition and they tried their best to make the country 'better'. Their personality was one of the elements which build up the European history that we know today, but it is strongly argued that there were other factors or the circumstances which actually brought the rulers of single party states to power. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. This essay will examine the rise of anti-Semitism from ancient times to the Holocaust ...

    Victims included Jews, gypsies, Soviet State Officials and the physically and mentally disabled. The killings were brutal, victims were made to dig their own graves, hand over their valuables, stripped and then shot in front of the trench they had dug.

  2. How did Joseph Stalin rise to power?

    This meant that no body really knew what Stalin was like behind the scenes. Surely if Trotsky spoke out and exposed Stalin then people would not have admired Stalin so much but on the contrary would have reviled him. Therefore Stalin may not have risen to power so easily if Trotsky did speak out.

  1. Why did Hindenburg appoint Hitler as Chancellor in 1933?

    and each area had a leader (Gauleiter) who was appointed by Hitler to carry out his orders. They opened up groups for young people, women, students, lawyers and workers which help to bring a sense of community to certain areas (Volksgemeinshaft).

  2. History - Mussolini's Rise to Power

    Simply the Fascist message offered something for everybody, its vagueness and, predominantly, there being no published work on its philosophy meant that it could be inferred accordingly by the different social groups they aimed at. For example, the Fascists' working-class support came through them maintaining some aspects of their original radicalism (before 1919)

  1. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin Both Vladimir Lenin and Joseph ...

    He always had high expectations of himself and of his work towards Russia, which led to him being a perfectionist: "Lenin's attitude to subordinates who bungled things was in general Ill-tempered and unforgiving, while those who crossed or challenged him were abused and reviled.

  2. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    His main focus was on making the public aware that Hitler and Stalinism was so similar. He argued that Nazism should not be regarded as the incomparable evil of the 20th century.5 He developed upon Arendt's theory that communism and Nazism shared the same totalitarian form.

  1. 'At Munich Hitler gained what he wanted and achieved conquest without firing a shot' ...

    Kershaw saw Hitler as being determined for war against Czechoslovakia as his fundamental aim, even going as far to say that Hitler would have been prepared for a wider war if necessary against the western powers of Britain and France if a situation came about, however Kershaw states that Hitler

  2. Adlof Hitler and Joseph Stalin were the two of the most powerful dictators in ...

    The radios only broadcasted Hitler's programs. Hitler used airplanes in propaganda. The Berlin Olympics was also a form of propaganda. He found that in order to make Germany grow he needs more power and support; as a result of this, it changed into terror.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work