• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Rise of Stlainism

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Essay Question: To what extent was the rise of Stalinism due to his opportunism? In 1922, Lenin was incapacitated by a stroke, and everyone thought his likely successor to be Leon Trotsky. Yet, within 5 years, Trotsky had been expelled from the Communist party and it was evident that Stalin had taken power. Indeed, the reason for the rise of Stalin to a position of total and supreme power is a hugely controversial subject that has been hotly debated by historians. However, I agree with the statement that "the rise of Stalinism due to his opportunism" to a large extent. First and foremost, Stalin's opportunism - his tendency to advance in situations where he thought he could do so without provoking too strong a response - is pivotal in explaining his rise. As late as 1924, many Communist party members still saw Stalin as "Comrade Card-Index" - a lowly administrator with a dull personality. Yet, as Steve Philips writes, "Stalin was skilful in using the circumstances that presented themselves... and the opportunities that arose to overcome his opponents within the party." An excellent example would be that of Lenin's funeral. At this funeral, Stalin made use of the fact that he was to deliver an oration to present himself as the chief mourner, emphasis the need to apply the ideas of Lenin and highlight his intention of continuing the works of Lenin. ...read more.

Middle

As Philips mentioned, "Many Bolsheviks wondered whether Trotsky was a man of the party or of his own agenda." To make matters worse, Trotsky did nothing to dispel the fears, but chose instead to criticise the party. This is evident from his criticisms on party bureaucracy as aforementioned as well as his attacks on Lenin's New Economic Policy in his essays Lessons on October published in 1924 after Lenin's death. Many saw this as an insult to Lenin and with the intense atmosphere of "Lenin worship", Trotsky soon lost many supporters, of whom many turned instead to Stalin who had exploited popular sentiments to his advantage. Philips further substantiates this, "[Stalin's] arrogance and aloofness, while making him unpopular with the party, also led to a lack of judgement on occasions." Trotsky's gross misjudgement of the mood after Lenin's death as mentioned above is an excellent example. Furthermore, as mentioned by Lowe, Trotsky's intellectual brilliance worked against him by arousing the envy and resentment of the Politburo leaders who united in effort to prevent Trotsky to become leader. Trotsky's arrogance led him to become alienated from a large number of party members and he did little to garner support or organise his supporters. A good evidence of his growing unpopularity is that of the outcomes of the Thirteenth Party Conference, in which few of Trotsky's members were elected. ...read more.

Conclusion

Through their actions, they aided Stalin in the removal of Trotsky, and allowed his growing power to grow unchecked until it was too late. In conclusion, I believe that Stalin's opportunism was the most important factor in contributing to his rise. To put it very simply, all other factors hold no water because if it was not for Stalin's opportunism, they would have had been useless. First and foremost, Stalin's appeal came primarily from the ability to exploit circumstances, attitudes and situations to his advantage. He based his main strength and focus on reflecting what the people and party members wanted, and thus raising his appeal and gaining their support. Next, Stalin's various positions as well as the prevalent attitudes, fears and overall atmosphere of feelings of the Politburo and Communist Party were again, useful only because he had the opportunism to exploit them. While no one else wanted the role of General Secretary, Stalin took it as he foresaw the useful information and powers he would acquire which others had overlooked. As aforementioned, the attitudes, fears and atmospheres he exploited to gain power on one hand and undermine the opposition's support on the other. Finally, the weaknesses of his opponents meant nothing had Stalin been unable to take advantage of them, point them out to the party and use other methods to weaken his opponents' stand in the party. Thus, all in all, it is evident that Stalin's opportunism played the most pivotal role in his rise to power. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent was Hitlers rise to power due to Economic Problems?

    By removing all opposition to the Nazis and having the power to do as he desired, Hitler was untouchable and so the outbreak of the Second World War ensued. John Lukacs claims that: 'Zeitgeist (the spirit of the times) may have assisted Hitler's coming to power; but in the end he created his own Zeitgeist'.

  2. Who Was More Important - Lenin Or Stalin?

    time to slow things down towards industrialisation and to improve relations with the peasants. Sergei Kirov, a leading Communist, put forward these views at the Seventeenth Party Congress. There was talk of removing Stalin as leader, and Kirov seemed to be emerging as a popular alternative.

  1. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin Both Vladimir Lenin and Joseph ...

    Lenin was devoted to communism and was so motivated to spread it through Russia. He greatly hated the Tsarist regime. He wanted to overthrow capitalism all over the world. Lenin started to follow Marxism during his time in University. At Kazan, Lenin met and joined with other revolutionaries, he started

  2. .Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin. Lenin and Stalin had many ...

    This shows his evil character. "Death solves all problems. No man, no problem". This again illustrates murder poses no problem for Stalin. In terms of their beliefs both believed in Marxism. Marx saw Capitalism as wrong and history as a process of change. They therefore both believed in violent revolution by the workers after which the means of production would be for every ones benefit and shared (Communism).

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    Now that the threat of counter-revolution was real and tangible it can be seen as giving great weight to the argument of armed insurrection to get to Soviet state that the masses and the Bolshevik party wanted. This insurrection came to fruition in October and meant that the dual power system was finished when the Bolshevik party took over.

  2. To what extent was equality achieved under Stalin?

    a measure of economic liberalisation were implemented otherwise known as the NEP. In contrast, things became even worse for the workers under the NEP; some had called it the 'New Exploitation of the Proletariat'.30 They were less happy than the peasants due to a steep rise in unemployment in its first two years.

  1. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    Hostility to democracy Many on the right, including the governing ´┐Żlite remained hostile towards democracy and some sympathised with the Fascist party. Their failure to support democracy pushed the Socialists further left, which had a knock on effect, provoking further strong responses from the right.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Many developments were begun from almost nothing. 4. R. Davies: “The armaments industry of the 1930s was the most outstanding success of the pre-war Soviet economy”. 5. Geographical shift in industry ï more and more moved to the Urals and previously undeveloped Central Asian republics. 6. Considerable population shift.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work