• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Rise of Stlainism

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Essay Question: To what extent was the rise of Stalinism due to his opportunism? In 1922, Lenin was incapacitated by a stroke, and everyone thought his likely successor to be Leon Trotsky. Yet, within 5 years, Trotsky had been expelled from the Communist party and it was evident that Stalin had taken power. Indeed, the reason for the rise of Stalin to a position of total and supreme power is a hugely controversial subject that has been hotly debated by historians. However, I agree with the statement that "the rise of Stalinism due to his opportunism" to a large extent. First and foremost, Stalin's opportunism - his tendency to advance in situations where he thought he could do so without provoking too strong a response - is pivotal in explaining his rise. As late as 1924, many Communist party members still saw Stalin as "Comrade Card-Index" - a lowly administrator with a dull personality. Yet, as Steve Philips writes, "Stalin was skilful in using the circumstances that presented themselves... and the opportunities that arose to overcome his opponents within the party." An excellent example would be that of Lenin's funeral. At this funeral, Stalin made use of the fact that he was to deliver an oration to present himself as the chief mourner, emphasis the need to apply the ideas of Lenin and highlight his intention of continuing the works of Lenin. ...read more.

Middle

As Philips mentioned, "Many Bolsheviks wondered whether Trotsky was a man of the party or of his own agenda." To make matters worse, Trotsky did nothing to dispel the fears, but chose instead to criticise the party. This is evident from his criticisms on party bureaucracy as aforementioned as well as his attacks on Lenin's New Economic Policy in his essays Lessons on October published in 1924 after Lenin's death. Many saw this as an insult to Lenin and with the intense atmosphere of "Lenin worship", Trotsky soon lost many supporters, of whom many turned instead to Stalin who had exploited popular sentiments to his advantage. Philips further substantiates this, "[Stalin's] arrogance and aloofness, while making him unpopular with the party, also led to a lack of judgement on occasions." Trotsky's gross misjudgement of the mood after Lenin's death as mentioned above is an excellent example. Furthermore, as mentioned by Lowe, Trotsky's intellectual brilliance worked against him by arousing the envy and resentment of the Politburo leaders who united in effort to prevent Trotsky to become leader. Trotsky's arrogance led him to become alienated from a large number of party members and he did little to garner support or organise his supporters. A good evidence of his growing unpopularity is that of the outcomes of the Thirteenth Party Conference, in which few of Trotsky's members were elected. ...read more.

Conclusion

Through their actions, they aided Stalin in the removal of Trotsky, and allowed his growing power to grow unchecked until it was too late. In conclusion, I believe that Stalin's opportunism was the most important factor in contributing to his rise. To put it very simply, all other factors hold no water because if it was not for Stalin's opportunism, they would have had been useless. First and foremost, Stalin's appeal came primarily from the ability to exploit circumstances, attitudes and situations to his advantage. He based his main strength and focus on reflecting what the people and party members wanted, and thus raising his appeal and gaining their support. Next, Stalin's various positions as well as the prevalent attitudes, fears and overall atmosphere of feelings of the Politburo and Communist Party were again, useful only because he had the opportunism to exploit them. While no one else wanted the role of General Secretary, Stalin took it as he foresaw the useful information and powers he would acquire which others had overlooked. As aforementioned, the attitudes, fears and atmospheres he exploited to gain power on one hand and undermine the opposition's support on the other. Finally, the weaknesses of his opponents meant nothing had Stalin been unable to take advantage of them, point them out to the party and use other methods to weaken his opponents' stand in the party. Thus, all in all, it is evident that Stalin's opportunism played the most pivotal role in his rise to power. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent was Hitlers rise to power due to Economic Problems?

    By removing all opposition to the Nazis and having the power to do as he desired, Hitler was untouchable and so the outbreak of the Second World War ensued. John Lukacs claims that: 'Zeitgeist (the spirit of the times) may have assisted Hitler's coming to power; but in the end he created his own Zeitgeist'.

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin Both Vladimir Lenin and Joseph ...

    The Bolsheviks felt that when the time came, they would start the revolution in order to take power and overthrow the Tsar. Stalin became involved with the Revolutionaries at his seminary. It was here where Stalin started to attend secret underground meetings and this in time led to his expulsion.

  1. .Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin. Lenin and Stalin had many ...

    People loyal to Stalin (e.g. Party apparatchiks) received privileges, holidays, houses etc. Lenin believed he was working for the people and was liked by many. By contrast Stalin only worked for Stalin. Unlike Lenin, he had no illusions that he was working for the people. Stalin did not care if he was liked of not.

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    and peasants. In order to complete this plan he had to kill all of the Kulaks because he knew that they would never get used to being at the same level as the really poor peasants and as there were so many of them he couldn't find any other way.

  1. To what extent was equality achieved under Stalin?

    became the "mainstay of the regime."46 The Purges: Stalin's equaliser The Purges were the devices used by Stalin to create universal distrust, extensive suspicion and widespread fear - all features inimical to an egalitarian society. The historiographical argument as to whether or not the Purges were completely "masterminded by an

  2. Napoleon Bonaparte.

    Finally, he made changes in both education and religion but they were both to be more beneficial to the state not the people. After his successes, the senate wished to give Napoleon Consulship for the following ten years but when the country voted it was obvious that they felt he deserved more.

  1. History - Mussolini's Rise to Power

    Their ideological stance dramatically altered according their target audience and the political/social context of the time. This is epitomised by the changes between 1919 - where the Fascist message stressed anti-clericalism, democracy and social welfare in a more radical programme - and 1921 - where a more right-wing programme was

  2. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    could have continued along a democratic course; Martin Clark stresses this point in his book Modern Italy7. In January 1921 the Socialist party split, after which Italy had a very small Communist party which was partly financed by Russia. It was too small to be a real threat to the Fascists but presented them with an ideal propaganda opportunity.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work