• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Russian failure during the Russo-Japanese war was the principal catalyst for Revolution in Russia in 1905. How far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked ?Russian failure during the Russo-Japanese war was the principal catalyst for Revolution in Russia in 1905.? ? How far do you agree with this statement? The Russo-Japanese war, a conflict largely of Russia?s own making, began in 1904 and for which one of the main motives was to distract national attention from Russia?s domestic troubles by rallying the nation in a patriotic struggle. To assess its significance with regard to its part in acting as a catalyst for the 1905 revolution it is necessary to consider how other economic, social and political factors of this era would have influenced the minds of the Russian people and how this would have contributed to revolution. Russia?s humiliating defeat in this conflict would have certainly been a factor in causing national unrest in that it undermined national confidence and thus provoked a want for change in Russian society. Despite this, long term political problems in Russia caused tension for years prior to the revolution and it is this which I believe was a more significant catalyst for Revolution in 1905. In 1904 opposition to Tsarist rule was growing and consequently Tsar Nicholas II was advised by Plehve, the Minister of the Interior, that a ?small, victorious war? would ?avert a revolution.? This combined with the notion that Russia needed to further its expansionist policy in the Far East and a need to an ice-free port resulted in the Russian government rejecting Japanese proposals for the settlement of the Korea question in an attempt to provoke a military response. ...read more.

Middle

Sergei Witte, a highly influential Russian policy-maker, supported State Capitalism through which he believed modernisation could be achieved. He imposed heavy taxes and high interest rates at home in Russia and limited the import of foreign goods. Despite the fact that Witte?s aim of modernisation and urbanisation was largely achieved, this resulted in consumers being penalised as they had to pay the higher prices traders introduced and prices tended to rise as a result of tariffs making goods scarcer. The Trans-Siberian railway which Witte pioneered encouraged connection between the remote central and Eastern Empire and the industrial west, which in turn encouraged the migration of industrial workers to cities to work in factories. However, the living conditions in these factories were often appalling and thus it could be said that this contributed the emergence of events relating to the revolution such as Bloody Sunday, as they provided hardship which promoted social unrest. Moreover, he paid no attention to Russia?s agricultural needs, thus neglecting many of Russia?s peasants who lived in hardship and it could be said this further contributed to social agitation. Although it is certain that Witte?s Economic Reform did have positive benefits, it did also undoubtedly have negative impacts in Russia which could be said to have contributed to the Revolution. When comparing Russia?s humiliating defeat in the Russo-Japanese war to the negative effects of Witte?s economic reform, I would agree with the statement in that I feel Russia?s maritime defeat was a more significant catalyst for revolution than economic reform. ...read more.

Conclusion

The long term effects of mistrust in the Tsar?s government policies and the opportunity this provided for revolutionary groups to inspire a vision of change seem to have provided the basis and thus principal catalyst for Revolution, whereas the end to the Russo-Japanese war seems to have come at a convenient time which provided a final force to ignite Revolution. To conclude, it is my belief that the principal catalyst and predominant reason for Revolution in Russia in 1905 was in fact a combination of political factors leading to social unrest, as opposed to Russian failure during the Russo-Japanese war. Having said this, the war was indeed important in that it came at a crucial time for igniting revolution. These political reasons for agitation in Russia, including a dislike of the Tsarist government, affected many members of society which allowed revolutionary groups to essentially inspire revolution. Although Witte?s economic reform could be said to play a part in political issues given his high position in government, alone I believe that reform brought more prosperity to Russia and was a just attempt to avert Revolution. Finally, with regards to Russia?s failure in the Russo-Japanese war having been a principal catalyst for Revolution in 1905, I feel that although humiliating for Russia, it wouldn?t have had such a significant effect as it seems to without Russia?s economic and political issues alongside it and thus was not the principal catalyst. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * This might take longer to create capital for investment and industry would have to make the goods peasants wanted to buy, but that way a sound economy would develop. * The peasants would gradually be won over by the benefits of Socialism and a new, fair society would emerge.

  2. How far was the Russian Japanese war of 1905 the cause of the 1905 ...

    It again demonstrated the ineffectiveness of government's ideas. Hence, it provided another reason for a change in the government. The intelligentsia especially blamed the government for the industrial backwardness. All this exacerbated the grievances of the people and turned them against the government.

  1. Vietnam war

    * Were equipped with AK47s rifles and B40 rockets from captured French and US supplies� bettered equipped than the ARVN. * Employed extensive tunnelling systems to counter the effects of America's defoliate campaign from the air. 300 KM Cu Chi tunnel system north of Saigon � provided control offices, hospitals,

  2. "The 1905 Revolution transformed the autocracy". Assess the validity of this view of Russia ...

    Once again, this stems from the 1905 revolution. This was also a transformation as it was Government spending, not the Church; spending which rose from 19 million roubles in 1905 (1.8% of the budget) to 76 million roubles in 1914 (4.2% of the budget) Militarily, it can be said that the 1905 revolution transformed the autocracy.

  1. Free essay

    What Were the Causes of the 1905 Revolution? Why did the Revolution Fail to ...

    The Tsar didn't even come to receive the petition. Instead, alarmed by warnings, he fled to the town of Tsarkoe in Selo, fifteen miles away. This cowardly act not only rendered the bloody procession pointless, but it also led to a series of countless strikes and problems for the Tsar.

  2. How far do you agree that the Russo Japanese war was the biggest cause ...

    Even the Tsars most supportive biographer concluded that this ?disastrous and unnecessary war with Japan was more Nicholas? fault than anybody else?s.? This horrendous defeat gave the public a welcomed opportunity to openly criticise autocracy. Autocracy had caused Nicholas to blunder into the war.

  1. How far did Russia undergo economic and political modernization from 1881-1905?

    He didn?t know whether to industrialize so he could keep up with countries such as Germany and Britain. However the disadvantage of industrialization and modernisation would mean he might have to delegate some of his power. The Russian economy was also unable to advance as it had a poor banking

  2. Assess the reasons for the 1905 Russian Revolution

    Also the fact that the working class were forced to live in cramped dirty overcrowded conditions. Also due to the industrialisation of Russia many of the workers in the country had come into the cities so this led to mass overcrowding of the cities and the tsar didn?t care.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work