• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Russo Japanese War

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐How far was the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-05 responsible for the outbreak of the 1905 revolution? The revolution of 1905 was as you could say, not expected. Russia wasn?t developed in any way, being a communist country before 1905. Karl Marx said that society in Russia was feudal, with the majority of the country being known to be Serfs, peasants who look after the land. The whole of Russia was always a reformed country, with many problems whilst Alexander II and even when Alexander III took the reign, nothing improved. When Alexander III became Tsar, he wanted to improve Russia after not really agreeing with his Fathers decisions. However, this didn?t really work and Alexander III inherited many of the problems which Russia had already been faced with; Backward economy, Subsistance agriculture and oversized population. In 1881, the reign was then moved over to Alexander III son, Nicolas II. As there was such an oversized population through out the whole of Russia, there was not enough space in the country. ...read more.

Middle

Nicolas II then set up that 300 ships would take a long journey of 21,000 miles to sail to Japan. The last 8 months shown Russia to undergo many diseases and hunger before setting out to sale to fight again, with it?s last hope that Russia would take over after sailing to the pacific coast. When most of the ships got to the coast, Japan was yet again very prepared for the fight with faster ships and better guns. In the first battle, Japan sank 2/3 of the Russian fleet of ships. I think the war had been a waste to resources that Russia had, the war was a definite failure by being defeated by Japan. After the war was seen by everyone in Russia to have been a catastrophe, which shook everyone?s thoughts into the leader ship Russia had with Tsar, 1905 would show that it would be the year of revolution for the country. ...read more.

Conclusion

This is when for the first time, Tsar weighed his options. It would be either to give the people their civil rights, what the deserved and so long wished for. On the other hand, the option would be to crush the rebellion of the workers. This is when it came to the October manifesto, where there needed to be speed to quickly change the order of the government. People in Russia were now given freedom of speech including their civil rights. When summing up everything that occurred during 1904-05, it seems that everything happened quite quickly. With there being such a high population rate it probably made it more difficult and Tsar may have felt more pressure. In my opinion, I think that the war of Russo-Japan had a massive effect of the revolution, I can?t imagine that if there hadn?t been a war, that there would have been a revolution. I think the war put a lot into clear perspective, especially seeing how badly the country worked together when trying to defeat Japan, by immense failure and lack of communication. Kirsty Trusler ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Assess the Reign of Amenhotep III

    However, Egyptian princesses were never given to foreign kings, as a measure to ensure that power remained within Egyptian royalty/blood. Additionally, annual tax and tribute were given to Egypt in return for guaranteed protection and keeping peace. Amenhotep III's diplomacy has been contested as a possible drawback to the Egyptian

  2. How far was the Russo-Japanese war responsible for the 1905 revolution

    The share of the village land wasn't enough to keep them above the level of poverty. (It has been estimated that only 1/3 of the total area of agricultural land was given to the village communities; while more than 1/3 was kept by the state and the Imperial family, and 1/4 was still kept by the nobles.)

  1. The Third English Civil War

    give an assured peace, he was obliged to intervene in the confused negotiations of the various Scottish parties. At last, however, Charles II. made a show of agreeing to the demands of his strange supporters, and Leslie was free to move.

  2. The First English Civil War

    of Manchester, and other nobles and gentry of their party, possessed great wealth and territorial influence. Charles, on the other hand, although he could by means of impressment and the Lords-Lieutenant raise men without authority from Parliament, could not raise taxes to support them.

  1. To What Extent was the 1905 Revolution due to the Consequences of the 1904-1905 ...

    The main one was Government Policy. The Tsarist regime was seen as weak and indecisive and it was a very repressive government. Basically, anything that the Tsar said was done with no questions asked. He did not have to listen to anyone as he could decide everything himself and just order that it would be done.

  2. Alexander II is sometimes called the Tsar Liberator. Is this an accurate interpretation of ...

    An aspect which Russia could not afford to allow as Russia was already in a debt of 54 million roubles by 1855, hence the government could not allocate any finance towards areas such as military which needed severe reforming and modernisation as was made evident through the huge defeat in the Crimean War2.

  1. To What Extent Do You Agree That Alexander II Put Russia On The Path ...

    By industrialising Russia and improving the lot of the masses, he was sowing the seeds foe long-term unrest. Added to this, the fact that the emancipation had not been a straightforward affair further worsened the situation. The peasants were not freed; in essence, they had to buy their freedom through the payment of exceptionally long-term mortgages, known as redemption payments.

  2. The outbreak of the 1905 revolution was due to the grievances of the peasants ...

    Therefore both of them were reactionaries. Furthermore, a crucial influence on the 1905 revolution could be due to the economically backward system and the lack of development. However, it could be argued that a reason for the revolution was due to Nicholas II himself rather than the system he inherited.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work