• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should Britain Pull Out Their Troops From Iraq?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Should Britain Pull Out Their Troops From Iraq? Each time we open the papers or switch on the news, there is a new story about the post-war situation in Iraq. I am going to explore the difficult question of Britain's troops and whether they should be pulled out of Iraq. Daily reports in the media lead to very different views about if our troops and their vote in post-war Iraq. Some are saying keep them in to fight with the Americans and keep Iraq under control. Others are saying that it is not our war it is the Americans and they should fight it on their own. They say pull out our troops. I will be analysing and summarise some information and reports and look at the views and check the validity of the information. The first bit of research that I am going to analyse is about a poll pulling out the British troops and is from an article in the mirror Sep 1 2003. I have chosen this source because I thought that it contains some useful information about the war in Iraq and also about what the public think about the situation. ...read more.

Middle

This source is of a valid because it is written by a news reporter so she would know what is going on over there because they would have cameramen and people over there doing work. This source as valid as the others sources and gets its information through America. Comparing the Sources Sources one and two are reasons why troops should be pulled out of Iraq. Source one tells you about the demand for the troops to be pulled out of Iraq when asked whether to, to be pulled out now, gradually or to stay in for as long as necessary and most of the population voted for them to be pulled out gradually. Source two talks about how people have protested and have been sent to prison for arguing against going to fight in the war but also how people have died in the war and that this is why we should not be at war any longer. They are similar in the feeling that it shouldn't have been our war in the first place and troops are being killed because of the way the war was handled. If you compare source three with the other sources they are about the same the same thing but they have different views on whether the troops should stay there or not. ...read more.

Conclusion

"Iraq has divided the international community. It has divided this party, the country, families, friends," Blair said. "I know many people are disappointed, hurt and angry. I know many believe profoundly the action we took was wrong." But despite striking a conciliatory note, Blair made clear he had no regrets about launching a war alongside U.S. President George W. Bush and without the approval of the United Nations Security Council. "I would take the same decision again," Blair said. The speech to delegates was considered a crucial test for a prime minister facing a crisis of confidence among voters and members of his own party who believe he has strayed too far from Labour's socialist roots. Source 4 Iraq: British Public Concerned By Attacks on Troops, But Against Leaving By Jan Jun Continued attacks against coalition forces in Iraq have citizens in the U.K. concerned about the fate of the roughly 10,000 British soldiers still based there. Still, many Britons say they want Western troops and civilian administrators to "finish the job" and stay in Iraq until peace is restored and a democratic government is in place. Experts, however, say that support could quickly drain away if attacks on soldiers continue. Brett Newton 12WA 5 Pages Page 1 of 6 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The United Nations and the Iraq Conflict

    the UN to react to an attack on a city in the same way. Due to alliances and historical importance, it is obvious that certain states are regarded as more important to attack or defend.19 Alliances, the association of nations, formed to advance common interests or causes are very influential within the Security Council.

  2. The role of Saddam Hussain in serving the aims of America in the Middle ...

    One of the most prominent features of this campaign was to portray the oil sheikhs as being ignorant and primitive and imply that the civilised world should not allow them to control this vital commodity and exploit it for their own purposes.

  1. War With Iraq.

    How could they get involved with something that is against countries having weapons of mass destruction, when that is exactly what they are doing? The Coalition was made up of American and British soldiers. They fought side by side in efforts to rid Iraq of Saddam Hussein and his followers.

  2. What are the arguments for and against the war on Iraq, What are the ...

    So far there have been over 10,000 deaths each day. 9 news presenters have been killed, and two are missing. None of these deaths were necessary, they are the result of a war that most do not want, of find to be justified.

  1. US President George Bush labelled Iran and Iraq as part of an "axis of ...

    Iran could easily sustain its energy requirements using oil. Even if Iran wanted to produce nuclear power for civilian use, there is no need for it to start nuclear fuel cycle and reprocessing operations. Such operations are only done to produce fissionable material14, which is against the NPT.15 A recent CIA report has found that much of Iran's nuclear programme is indeed aimed at manufacturing nuclear weapons.

  2. I have chosen to debate whether the decision to attack Iraq was indeed a ...

    The reason most often given by President Bush for going to war with Iraq is to reduce the risk of a WMD attack on the United States. Such an attack would be devastating, and vigorous action is appropriate to prevent it.

  1. Citizenship Comparing two articles - " Show you don't want war" and "Iraq evidence ...

    Bush do the same, only this time pinning the blame firmly on Iraq. Not a news bulletin passes without one of these figures making a offensive comments about each other or trying to justify their reasoning. Rather ironically the largest figure of hate and the man at the centre of

  2. Should We Go To War With Iraq? - Discursive Essay

    They have a distinctive history, however, and speak Kurdish, a member of the Indo-Iranian, rather than Semitic, family of languages. They have tried to assert their national identity and have demanded cultural and political autonomy, but the government has put down their protests with brutal force.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work