• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Source A is an extract from a book written by John F Kennedy, before his presidency. The first paragraph shows the belief in the 'domino effect', - if Vietnam turned communist

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Rebecca Thomas 11-o Assignment two: Objective three 1 Source A is an extract from a book written by John F Kennedy, before his presidency. The first paragraph shows the belief in the 'domino effect', meaning that he supported the theory that if Vietnam turned communist, then it would push all the surrounding countries into communism as well. This was one of America's greatest fears and because of this theory they wanted to prevent Vietnam's turn to communism. In Kennedy's words 'the domino effect' is described as a 'red tide of communism', which will 'overflow' across many countries. Kennedy lists the countries that it was believed would fall under communism if Ho Chi Minh was not stopped in Vietnam. This then leads on to the implication that such a spread of communism is a threat to the US. Kennedy says that, "the independence of Vietnam is crucial to the Free World." In saying this he implying that if communism is allowed to spread then it offers a serious threat to the capitalism in the US. For this reason, it was felt that communism must be contained. At this point in the Cold War it was not possible, or practical, to crush communism completely, but nevertheless it needed to be contained so that it could not grow into an even bigger threat. The second paragraph continues by putting across this same opinion but also state that Vietnam will (if it proceeds and becomes communist) influence Asia because Vietnam's 'political liberty is an inspiration to Asia'. Kennedy had also already made promises to America that he would help other countries fighting communism. 2 Source B is an extract from a statement made by the US state department; it helps to show the reasons for US involvement by expressing America's fears of communism, the source refers once again to the 'domino effect' by mentioning Korea and how in 1950 the north tried to take over the south. ...read more.

Middle

Also the percentages mentioned in the source do not add up to one hundred percent and so we are left not fully informed. The problems with television are that clips can be selected to give a certain image, and in this case information and footage of the events in Vietnam were probably chosen to promote the involvement of the US. Therefore, despite source F seeming to be quite useful on the surface, its data seems to be flawed in a number of ways. It fails to mention the sort of people that were asked, so it is difficult to put the statistics in context. Source G is useful because it comes from a respected opinion poll and therefore can be trusted to a certain extent. However whilst it is clear that from 1965 to 1968 the public's view of the most important problem was Vietnam, it is not clear as to what aspect of the Vietnam war. It could be one of all manner of aspects, including opposition to the war or could be concerned with victory. The point is that we don't know; all we know is that it was an important issue in the public's mind. Source I is useful because, despite any possible spin put on by the reporter, the event described most likely happened. Furthermore, the event itself is horrific on its own even if the reporter did twist the facts somewhat. However, it must be noted that the article was held back from publishing for two years (from 1968 to 1970). This could have been for a number of reasons. The most probable is because it was probably believed that it would have an adverse effect on public opinion. Considering the nature of the article, publishing it in 1968 could have been disastrous if the public decided to take action against the government. Furthermore, it could be argued that it was delayed until after the 1968 election, perhaps so that it wouldn't affect the voters' decisions. ...read more.

Conclusion

The shock factor also played an important part of this. Rather uniquely, the Vietnam War also saw a new aspect of reporting. For the first time, they were out just for facts mainly because that's what the public wanted. The more facts a reporter could give, the more popular the story would be. This, quite obviously, resulted in a much greater informed public. Lastly, footage was repeated over and over again and this had the effect of drilling events into the public. It became a part of their lives and they knew exactly what was going on. This must have had an effect on their opinions as to whether what they were seeing should be happening. Having said this, there are of course other reasons for the changing attitudes but, in my opinion, these played a lesser role. To begin with, there were magazines and newspapers, which, whilst still around during previous wars, were uncensored for the most part. Therefore, they reflected similar events as television but they also put across various opinions, particularly in cartoons such as the one in Source L. To a lesser extent, radio also informed people of what was happening in Vietnam. There was also the growing pop culture in the US. Protest singers such as Bob Dillan, Joan Baez, the Byrds and John Lennon (later in the 1970s) influenced other people's opinions by putting across theirs in a more creative way. Songs such as the one in Source K effectively put across their opinions in a very different way, that made people stop and think about whether the war was right or not. In conclusion, I would say that there were definitely other reasons for the change in the public's attitudes to the war but I think that television was the most important, not least because it triggered a change in the way the other medias put across their information. It was television that allowed the public to actually see what was happening right at the front line. This was a first and it raised public awareness enormously by providing them with hard, uncensored facts. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. America In Vietnam, 1953-73

    To the Nixon White House, as guilty as Johnson of treating "what it said and what it did as 2 separate matters". The papers detailed the American's military role in Vietnam during the Kennedy and Johnson administrators, and the diplomatic proceedings of the Truman and Eisenhower years.

  2. Analysis of Political Cartoons

    from America. This analysis will conceptualise this change, and place it in the context of this cartoon and find why public opinion of America and its ideals has changed. Since the 19th century America has believed in its god given will or "manifest destiny" (Smith, 2000: 38)

  1. To what extent can it be argued that the use of guerilla warfare tactics ...

    It also needs to be linked to the overall question you are addressing - namely, establishing the main reason why they lost. You need a signposting sentence here to provide a smooth link between paragraphs. In a war in which the average age of troops is 19, a great level of inexperience is to be expected.

  2. Is There Still an Imperial Presidency?

    In this case, Nixon refused turning over the Watergate special prosecutor his taped conversations. He tried using his implied authority to invoke "executive privilege" but the Supreme Court decided that the privilege did not protect the tape, and the release of the tape ended his regime.

  1. Post-Cold War Realities

    Iran, with its reduced value of as a buffer state, can no longer play one superpower off the other?a strategy that it learned well. Its crushing defeat in the 80?s by an Iraqi force that was subsequently annihilated by the U.S.

  2. What can you learn from Source A about the reasons for US involvement in ...

    One of the reasons why the Vietcong were undefeated were their use of guerrilla tactics and America's poor preparation for war. America had very little experience of troops like the Vietcong and Guerrilla tactics. The Viet Cong had the support of the people, where as American forces were unpopular in Vietnam.

  1. The Role and Importance of the Media in Vietnam

    The media's initial support for the Administration was mostly based on two factors, The first was pure ideology, the idea that as a bastion of freedom, the United States had the right and even duty to intervene when one of its ships was attacked by Communist forces and that the

  2. How was opposition to the Vietnam War portrayed in contemporary literature, film and popular ...

    come home alive and that even those who came home and had had long-term mental issues were still regarded as miracles. "I talk, but my letter read from Whiskey Sam you're a walkin' talkin' miracle from Vietnam" Finally Perry Friedman, an artist who through his song told of how the government acted towards those who refused to go to war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work