• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Sources N and P give different interpretations of the importance of the anti-war movement to the ending of the war. What reasons can you give to explain the difference?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Kirsty Singleton 11MG Assignment 1, Question 3e Study sources N and P. Sources N and P give different interpretations of the importance of the anti-war movement to the ending of the war. What reasons can you give to explain the difference? Source N shows a picture of a huge crowd, outside Kent State University, protesting against the war. It is accompanied with text, in which is mentioned that Nixon was elected with 'the task of getting the United States out of the war.' The Americans just wanted peace. The Vietnam war was the first war to be covered constantly by the media. 24 hour news channels showed the American's everything that was happening. ...read more.

Middle

They ended the war, that's what this source says to me. Source P talks of Nixon's problems after he had been voted in. It suggests that the war ended because of the injured or dead. Because of drug usage by American soldiers. Because of 'inflation'. The amount of money spent on the war caused taxes in America to rise, to keep up with the cost, but even that wasn't enough, the U.S. could just not afford the war any more. Not to mention that the Americans were fed up of Johnson's constant blundering. Nixon was voted in on the Vietnamization policy. The policy which stated that Nixon would encourage the South Vietnamese to stand up and fight on their own, and to bring the American troops home. ...read more.

Conclusion

Neither of them are wrong. Every factor, the people's conscience, the constant media coverage, the deaths, the drugs, the violence, the inflation - all of these played a part in bringing about the end of a war that should never have began, and that could never be won. All of these factors played a vitally important part in the changing attitudes of the Americans, their ideas changing from pro- war in the early 60's, to a very much anti-war attitude at the end of the very same decade. In the end, I would declare Source P the more fact based of the two, even though they are both based on fact, whereas sources Ni, and Nii give the very definite impression that the moral conscience of the mass media influenced American populace were very much a deciding factor in the end of the Vietnam war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Role and Importance of the Media in Vietnam

    The peak of public support for the Vietnam war was in January 1966 and it steadily declined thereafter. With the casualties rising from 1000 to 10000 "homeboys", statistics show that the overall support of the Military dropped by 15%. Such a response was regardless of how the war was going and the same pattern has been observed in Korea.

  2. Is there sufficient evidence in sources A to F to explain why there was ...

    Source A is a written source from the book "Four Hours in My Lai" by Michael Bilton which attempts to explain why the United States suffered such high casualties throughout the war. Most soldiers were more likely to die in the first few months of their tour of duty than

  1. Question 1 minus intro n conslus

    Here, Henry Ford combined precision manufacturing, standardized and interchangeable parts, a division of labour, and, in 1913, a continuous moving assembly line. Workers remained in place, adding one component to each automobile as it moved past them on the line.

  2. Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was ...

    The photographer isn't identified and it doesn't state where the photo was taken and you can't tell people saw it and if they reacted. Source C is a written extract by an American journalist called Richard Hammer in 1970. The source is about the wide spread opposition to the American presence in Vietnam.

  1. Analyse and Discuss the Reasons Behind the Breakdown in the Relationship Between the United States a

    the re- creation of the mistake many believed had been made with The Treaty of Versailles i.e. being too punitive in relation to reparations and development in Germany These views although divergent to some degree, need not have been axiomatically opposed.

  2. Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A-F to explain why there was an anti-war ...

    However it is not sufficient evidence to explain why there was an anti-war movement because it is only an extract and you don't know if it typical or unique. You also don't know what comes before or after it and there could be something written that completely changes the meaning.

  1. The anti- war movement - Vietnam.

    "But you'd never see anybody..." This helps us see why the American Public empathised with the soldiers, especially when truths much like this escaped. Source D is a very valuable source. It is an article written at the time by a journalist.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Also bourgeois idealists, youths from Europe, most of them die-hards of the New Left's militant 'peace-movements' of the late 1960s and now playing at revolution, and some of them neo-Nazis, were drawn here from the safe societies of the West to revel in the 'real thing'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work