• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16

Soviet State

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Soviet State under Stalin Stalin's Role in the Soviet State The crisis of modernisation: from indirect to direct mobilisation * The emergence of the Stalinist machine opened up new approaches to the underlying problem of backwardness. By the late 1920s a very different situation made available to the government a third strategy - to tackle the peasantry head on and take what was necessary by force as it had during the period of War Communism. The precondition of this was the strengthened ruling group and a powerful and ruthless leadership. * Strategies of direct mobilisation appeared once more on the Party's agenda, with Stalin as their main sponsor. * By 1929 the Stalinist machine provided the spine of such as system. And the emergence of Stalin as undisputed leader gave the system a unity and decisiveness it lacked during the power struggle. Meanwhile the other organs of the coercive machinery were the army and police which had a decade of relative stability to grow their traditions. * As leader of such a group, Stalin was in a position to pursue the twin goals of industrial growth and military power more ruthlessly than any other Russian ruler. During the 1930s he showed that he possessed both the will and ability to do so. Introduction of Collectivisation and Industrialisation (Five Year Plans) A Social Revolution * In 1929 the Soviet Government launched a final assault on the capitalist countryside. NEP men and kulaks were expropriated, and the remaining peasants were formed into collective farms headed by government appointed directors. Collectivisation and dekulakisation were the beginnings of a 'revolution from above' which within a few years had completed the social revolution that begun in 1917. Once it was completed, there were no longer any classes living off the ownership of property; all members of Soviet society lived from wage labour. * Since the proclamation of the Stalin constitution in 1936, the Soviet Government has recognised the existence of only two classes- the proletariat and the ...read more.

Middle

This means that the efficiency with which capital was used actually fell in this period. This reflects the immense wastage of the early years of the industrialisation drive. Plants were built before machinery was ready to use them. Peasants wrecked machines they did not understand. * By the mid 1930s, the profit the government made on resales of grain and other produce extracted through compulsory procurement quotas accounted for one third of the budget, illustrating the importance of collectivisation to the industrialisation drive. It is now clear however, that resources did not flow from countryside to town. On the contrary, there was a vast flow of money and resources in the opposite direction. Peasants found an important source of income by selling produce they grew on their private plots, which sold at high prices in the towns. In addition, the government was forced to invest heavily in agriculture simply to replace the number of livestock killed during collectivisation. * By the late 1930s the collective farms worked extremely effectively as a way of pumping resources from the countryside to the government. * The USSR industrialised at the expense of both town and countryside, at the cost of a decline in consumption levels and living standards of both the proletariat and the peasantry. In both areas, declining consumption levels released resources for investment. The resources that fuelled industrialisation came from the consumption fund of Soviet society as a whole. * In the 1930s and 1940s the USSR invested very little in housing (as opposed to a lot in the 1920s), diverting funds into heavy industry instead. As a result, the housing conditions of Soviet citizens declined drastically. In Moscow, in 1935, 6% of renting families occupied more than one room, 40% had a single room, 24% occupied part of a room, 5% lived in kitchens and corridors, 25% lived in dormitories. Conditions in provincial towns were often far worse. ...read more.

Conclusion

Almost 700 000 of those died in 1937 and 1938, at the height of the purges. At present, these are the best estimates available, according to David Christian. However, we can be certain that many more died unrecorded, so these count as low estimates. According to Robert Conquest, for example, 7 to 9 million people were arrested between 1936 and 1938, and that between 1 and 2 million were shot. In addition, a million people a year died from the terrible conditions of prison camp life, out of a total 8 to 12 million people. Altogether, Conquest estimates that 12 million people may have died in the camps post purge. If the 7 million or so he estimates to have died during dekulakisation and the 1933 famine are added to these figures, the Stalinist period appears to have accounted for about 20 million casualties. * According to David Christian, based on archival evidence, he suggests that in the late 1930s and 1940s, between 2 and 4 million lived in labour camps or as exiles in labour settlements. Christian: "Death rates in the [labour] camps were high, but, except during the war, they were probably not as high as the 10% per annum that Conquest regards as the normal rate. Recent archival research suggests that death rates in the camps reached 10% per annum only in 1939, and again during WW2. At other times, they ranged from 3.5% to almost 7% per annum." * In addition, Christian contradicts Conquest, in saying that far fewer died during the purges of the late 1930s than during collectivisation and the collectivisation famine of 1933. Despite the fact that the purges were seen as the height of Stalinist repression, this was mainly due to the fact that they were a far greater shock to the Soviet elite. * Explaining the terror: BUILDING A LOYAL RULING ELITE: THE VIDVIZHENTSY - The simplest explanation of the purges sees them as a product of Stalin's determination to remove all possible rivals and opposition. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Assess the economic, social and political consequences of the collectivisation of Russian agriculture in ...

    Another intention was that it would serve as the solution to the ongoing crisis that the Soviet Union faced of agricultural distribution, mainly in grain supplies, a problem that had been gradually developing since 1927, and became more acute when Stalin went ahead with his ambitious collectivisation and industrialisation policies (Davies 1980 p1).

  2. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    What Overy's book tries to establish is what exactly the two had in common and also whether the differences out way the similarities. As with other historians Overy focussed on areas such as, "the nature of the power they exercised, the 'cults of personality' that surrounded them, the role of

  1. Role of Women Under Stalin

    14 * Stalin only allowed women to enter the workplace because the Five Year plans had caused a huge increase in the demand for labor, and he thought they could use the women to "strengthen the economy at a fast rate."

  2. To What Extent was Stalin's Personal Paranoia the Main Reason for the Purges?

    This explanation does have some evidence in the form of the last show trial's proceedings, yet has too many other examples contradicting it. K. Bauman was made scapegoat for the first collectivisation excesses and Stetsky an old economist was also arrested at a similar time.

  1. How far did the achievements of Stalin's economic modernisation programme justify the costs?

    Stalin wanted the "liquidation of the kulaks as a class!"10 The kulaks were used as scapegoats for the grain shortages with many deported to 'GULAGS', shot on sight or forced to starve to death. There was resistance to 'de-kulakisation' however with kulaks burning their crops and slaughtering their animals as

  2. Were the 1930's the Devils Decade or The Dawn of Affluence?

    For this to work the main wage earner could not take a single day off work, no tobacco and beer, very plain clothing, no sick clubs or trade unions. Any family that lived below this sum of money would be in poverty, he predicted that approximately 18% of the entire

  1. "Stalin transformed the Soviet Union from a backward country into a strong modern state ...

    Taken from this base, ignoring all of the repercussions of the actions of Stalin, it is quite clear that Stalin did indeed advance Russia's socio-economic development a significant amount. In Stalin's period of control between 1928 and 1941, there was the most increase in all major materials such as grain, steel, iron ore, coal and oil.

  2. 'Stalin's leadership was the most significant reason for Soviet victory over Germany in the ...

    But they were poorly trained and had a lack of high quality weapons. They also did not have clear tasks and were poorly led at first. However, the Soviets had reinforcements in the form of money, planning and leadership. Zhukov was introduced and put a million more men in the Battle of Kursk.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work