• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin's Impact On Russia And The Russian People.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

3. Assess the impact that Stalin had on Russia and the Russian people. (8) Stalin had a great impact on Russia and the Russian people with his variety of policies and events that took place during his reign. Any events or policies had both short and long term effects for everyone. I will be looking at both of these. Firstly, there was his use of terror on the people. This was displayed by the Purges and labour camps both which Stalin commanded. With the Purges, there were many short and long-term effects. In the short-term, many leading Bolsheviks such as Kamenev, Bukharin and Zinoviev were removed from the party after show trials. The military purged 25,000 officers - around one in five - including the Supreme Commander of the Red Army, Marshal Tukhachevsky. The NKVD itself was purged. 500,000 party members were arrested, executed or sent to labour camps. The Purges began in 1934, when Kirov, the leader of the Leningrad Communist Party was murdered. Stalin used this murder as an excuse to 'purge' or clear out his opponents in the party. However, it is strongly suspected that Stalin arranged for Kirov's murder to give him this excuse. As the Purges continued university lecturers, teachers, miners and engineers, factory managers and ordinary workers all disappeared. It is said that every family in the USSR lost someone in the Purges. By 1937, an estimated 18 million had been sent to labour camps and 10 million had died. Stalin seriously weakened the USSR by removing so many able individuals. The Purges resulted in many long-term effects. Firstly, all of the leading Bolsheviks had gone, including Trotsky. Trotsky was killed in August 1940 by a member of the NKVD whilst living in exile in Mexico. The party was now completely ruled by Stalin and the only people who had power were those who he appointed. After most of the army was purged, the officers' that were left were young and inexperienced. ...read more.

Middle

During 1933, the million head of cows and pigs was at its lowest between 1913-1940 but then at its highest in 1940. Due to the disruption cause to agriculture, there were severe food shortages. When added to the disastrous harvest in 1932, the result was an unimaginable severity of famine from 1932-1933. The state never admitted that a famine was taking place so no international aid was received. Indeed, food was still being exported from the USSR to other countries. Stalin even sent out requisitioning hangs to seize what little grain there was. Grain was held in stores that were 'almost bursting', and even left to rot in the open while people nearby starved to death. Another short-term result was that by 1933 there were 200,000 tractors in the machine-tractor station and over 25,000 combine harvesters. Also, Stalin's wife even committed suicide. Nadia Alliluyeva saw the hardship that the peasants were made to endure and could no longer deal with it so took her own life. The main long-term result of collectivisation was that an estimated 13 million peasants, and possibly more, died. This was mainly due to the dreadful famine that there was during those years. Also, the figures show that the harvest did improve gradually after the famine. By 1940, the production was back to how it was. The lives of many peasants had been improved. They were given access to schooling, theatres, concerts and many other luxuries. There was increased literacy and even electricity. The kulaks were wiped out entirely as a class and by the end of the 1930's there were none of them left. They had either been killed or sent to labour camps. Before collectivisation, Russia was an agricultural society. Now it had been turned into a major industrial power. Mechanisation on the farms enabled many peasants to be drawn into the cities. The policy that went hand-in-hand with collectivisation was industrialisation - mainly the Five-Year Plans. ...read more.

Conclusion

Every worker was entitled to take a holiday each year - this was completely unknown before the Revolution. Trade unions and collective farms played a big part in providing sports facilities, clubs, film shows, festivals and general entertainment. However, for some people in collectives - the peasant - life was not that much better. There were few consumer goods and people were living in fear. For those in the labour camps, life was no better. In particular, there was a changing role of women in the mid 1930s. The State encouraged families to stay together through propaganda and divorces and abortion was made harder. There was child allowance for married couples and new cr�ches and day-care centres so women were able to work. By 1937, women were 40% of industrial workers (compared to 28% in 1927), 21% of building workers and 72% of health workers. Four out of five workers new workers recruited between 1932 and 1937 were women. The longer-term impacts of this were that generally living conditions improved for most Russians, although not all. Life was getting better until the German invasion when things were put on hold, as factories' priorities were making machinery etc to use in the war. The magnificent town built that was Magnitogorsk became renown for being a symbol of Russia's modernisation. Here, once everything was finished, there were a large number of theatres, schools and hospitals. There were all things that contributed to improving the general living conditions of Russians. Even the peasants were given access to education. In conclusion, Stalin played a very big part on the impact on Russia and the Russian people. This was through his variety of different policies and events. His main impact was saving Russia from invasion by Hitler amongst other important factors. After industrialisation and the Five-Year Plans, he managed to improve the lives of the people and the conditions they lived in and worked in. He not only managed to improve the peoples lives but the status Russia had as a country - it had now become a industrialised, modernised country. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful were the Five- Year Plans in transforming Russian industry in the years ...

    4 star(s)

    Working and living conditions were absolutely awful under Stalin and the five year plans. The people were worked to exhaustion and had to live in squalor and cramped conditions. It didn?t make for a good environment. Even though living standards were not part of the plan and therefore are not

  2. Assess the economic, social and political consequences of the collectivisation of Russian agriculture in ...

    certainly decreased, especially in 1930, however the issue was not as severe as in the rural region of the Soviet Union (Millar 1982 p65). Additionally, another consequence that collectivisation had socially in the Soviet Union in relation to the famine was that as people were starving, many engaged in acts

  1. What were the effects of the First Five Year Plan on Russia?

    in the towns because the workers in the towns and cities now had more food than before. Those in the industrial areas were bombarded with propaganda declaring collective farming to be a success and created an image of the ideal happy worker.

  2. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    does not conclude whether or not the similarities out way their differences but he does tend to focus on the difference more. He states that the regimes are different, that the gulags weren't as deadly as the German concentration camps and that power for Stalin, "seems to have been power

  1. Role of Women Under Stalin

    role changed in the 1930s when they began to gain approval as a 'great force' in industry, agriculture, and war. Limitations: The limitations of this source include hindsight bias, which is the inclination to believe that some events that have happended were more predictable than they in fact were.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    Millions died, especially in the countryside. * A key debate amongst historians is whether the advances could have been achieved in a more humane way, or was Stalin right that the only way to modernise the Soviet Union was by force and terror? Soviet production compared (figures from Culpin/Henig: Modern Europe 1870-1945 and other sources)

  1. During his lifetime, Lenin made many important decisions and policies which affected every citizen ...

    When the NEP was introduced by Lenin in 1922 after witnessing the disaster of war communism, peasants were allowed to sell their surplus food to the public and no longer had their food seized by the Government. The peasants were able to make a profit by selling their food and

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    However, at the same time, between 1925 and 1928, Russian agriculture showed considerable growth. 1. Land under cultivation increased by more than 25%, and in some areas, herds of cattle and horses by almost 33%. 2. Increasing prosperity ? this meant that more and more peasants fitted into the kulak bracket.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work