• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin's manipulation of the central organs of the Communist Party was they key reason for his rise to power by 1929. How far do you agree with this statement? Use the sources and your own knowledge to answer the question.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Paul Tamplin Stalin's manipulation of the central organs of the Communist Party was they key reason for his rise to power by 1929. How far do you agree with this statement? Use the sources and your own knowledge to answer the question. The rise of Stalin to his position of extreme power is a result of a number of factors varying from Stalin's personal characteristics and political skills to the situation of Russia in the years 1924.29. The argument that Stalin came to power as a result of his control of the central organs is strong. However, it is vital that the other factors are not dismissed as they all play an importance in Stalin's rise to power. Source A strongly supports the argument that it was his control of the party that resulted in his rise to power by explaining how Stalin had total control over the party and was able to allows his supporters to move up to the higher levels of the party, in which his main rivals were replaced with. ...read more.

Middle

Furthermore, during the 1920s Stalin would often speak last at Politburo (The key decision making body) and would float in and out of alliances. His lack of loyalty to any of his colleagues was extremely beneficial to him, as he would cunningly float in and out of alliances as a way of gaining popularity. This was the case with Stalin's change of policy on the NEP when he turned and attacked the right wing of the party and adopted the very policies of which he had smashed with the left of the party. Stalin's cunning and intelligent political attributes are key in his rise to power. Furthermore, the source offers the idea that his own personal characteristics, being a disloyal and ruthless, played a dominant part in his climb to supreme power. However, there are a number of arguments that have not been presented in the sources. Stalin's political skills, personal characteristics, policies and his control of the party organs have all been contested in the sources but there are many other factors that must be considered. ...read more.

Conclusion

This was not a good idea as Lenin was a cult figure in Russia and a much respected past leader by the party members. He also came under particular pressure when faced against the Triumvirate (Stalin, Zinoviev and Kamenev). By this time Trotsky's support was absolutely minimal and he made little effort to gain support or even organise the support he had. By 1926 Trotsky's weakness was finally exploited as Stalin was in the position to expel him. By 1929 Trotsky was neither in the party or the country as Stalin had expelled him from the party and country. Finally, there is an element of luck that contributed to Stalin's rise. For example, Lenin's testament was not read out which was lucky for Stalin as he said that Stalin was "too rude" and even went as far as to say that he should be removed from his current post of General Secretary. Moreover, for most of the struggle for power, Trotsky, whom was possibly his closest challenge, was ill. Trotsky's illness was the reason he was not in Russia for Lenin's funeral and relied purely on Stalin for the date of the funeral. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. History - Mussolini's Rise to Power

    A striking weakness here was that the established church was largely out of touch with the devout populace, specifically indicative with the Vatican's opposition to World War I against Catholic Austria, despite many Italian Catholics patriotically supporting Italy's involvement. Another weakness of the Catholic church was in Pope Pius XI's

  2. How did Stalin manage to secure power in Russia by 1929?

    Rather, they should concentrate on strengthening Russian society. These ideas of Stalin made him quite popular; most of Russia appreciated where he was coming from, as they understood the strain on resources and the upheaval it would cause. Having suffered great disruption as a result of the Second World War and the Civil War, they were exhausted economically and revolutionarily.

  1. "Mussolini was an all powerful dictator" - How accurate is this statement?

    4000 suspects, they were used more as a real threat to any possible opponents to keep the peace. However this still meant that Mussolini had this loyal secret police to control local opposition for him, making him even more powerful.

  2. How far do you agree Communist ideology influenced Stalin's decision to implement Collectivisation in ...

    Communal sharing and working together to feed the town or village are factors that Marx believed were involved in collective farming. Again, in evaluation Marx's suggestions on rural implementation of Communism are vague due to his urban orientation, and Marx contradicted himself with the a separate belief in the 'idiocy of rural life'5.

  1. How did Stalin Rise to Power between 1922 – 1929?

    Shukhanov described Stalin on the ExCom as "a grey blur which flickered obscurely and left no trace." 4 Shukhanov, being a member of the ExCom is a primary eyewtiness and knew Stalin very well. Therefore to a certain extent this source holds some truth.

  2. Using all these Sources and your own knowledge, how far do you agree that ...

    Source C supports the fact that Piedmont was politically weak ? I did not disguise from him that our object was to free Italy from foreign rule? this shows that they did not have a strong alliance as Cavour might have thought they had with Britain.

  1. British dominance was unrivalled during the period of 1850-1929. How far do you agree ...

    The Royal Navy did in fact, rule the waves and protect Britain in pride and strength. The Navy preserved the trade routes with the Empire and with other commercial partners, as well as doing the most obvious job; providing Britain with security and stability.

  2. Why was Stalin able to come to power by 1929?

    It developed the idea that the communist revolution was too weak to succeed in Russia due to the under developed economy. Trotsky appealed to the working class in the industrialised areas of Europe as he saw this as a bigger target base.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work