• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin's Rise To Power

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Essay - Stalin A.C. 2.1, 3.1, 5.1 02/03/10 Critically evaluate Stalin's rise to power. Josef Stalin was a much feared and reviled dictator who was responsible for the deaths of millions of Soviet citizens. It has been noted that "he is the man who turned the Soviet Union from a backward country into a world superpower at unimaginable human cost." (pbs.org/redfiles) [30 Jan 2010]. Born 1879 in Georgia to a poor, dysfunctional family, Stalin was regularly beaten by his violent father and developed a bad relationship with his religious mother, who sent him to a religious school to study to become a priest. Stalin did not complete his studies but instead was drawn towards the cities active revolutionary scene. It has been suggested that the violence he suffered at the hands of his father played a major role in developing his strength and determination (pbs.org/redfiles) [30 Jan 2010]. However, there are many other contributory factors that should be taken into consideration when evaluating Stalin's rise to power, including the various posts he held, his willingness to maintain Lenin's legacy and the weakness of his main rival, Leon Trotsky. Historical interpretation is an effective way for historians to translate the past into a meaningful sequence of events; however, the interpretation will vary depending on which historical schools viewpoint is being portrayed. ...read more.

Middle

Leading communists decided not to publish Lenin's testament as it contained criticisms of them as well as Stalin and Lenin died before any action could be taken. Even before Lenin's death, Stalin and Trotsky, along with Zinoviev, Kamenev and Bukharin were emerging as contenders to take his place, which meant Trotsky's brilliance was about to go head to head with Stalin's cunning. Trotsky seemed unprepared to fight for leadership and was easily out manoeuvred by Stalin, in fact his reason for not attending Lenin's funeral was that he had been given the wrong date by Stalin. Trotsky was originally thought of as the most obvious choice with his great mind and intelligent speeches. Trotsky had played a lead role in the October Revolution (Phillips 2000) and he had gained a lot of support during the Civil War. Stalin, on the other hand was seen as an insignificant administrator at that time; however, he had made many wise moves in his various roles and many underestimated him. When the Social Democrats split in 1903, Trotsky became a member of the Menshevik faction and developed his 'Permanent Revolution' theory, a belief that communism should spread beyond Russia. This theory had less support than Stalin's belief of 'Socialism in one Country.' Trotsky had spent many years away from Russia after escaping from exile in Siberia but returned after the 1917 February Revolution. ...read more.

Conclusion

Lenin memorabilia was produced from posters to matchboxes, statues were erected and Petrograd was renamed Leningrad. It has been said that Stalin constructed the 'Cult of Lenin' (Davis 2008) as a means to assist him in the leadership struggle. It cannot be said for sure whether Stalin had his sights on the leadership role in the early 1920's but his ruthless, calculating personality enabled him to manipulate situations and used every opportunity to his advantage (Davis 2008). The poor judgements and weaknesses of his opponents such as Trotsky helped Stalin to gain the support of the Communist Party. Having the power within his various job roles to find out information and ensure he had people in place who would support him was another important factor in his success. Stalin took every opportunity to take advantage of his opponents, their faults being that they trusted him too much or were not managing their own campaigns efficiently (Davis 2008). Despite not being the strongest contender as leader after Lenin's death, his actions at this time gained him popularity. Stalin's speech at Lenin's funeral portraying himself as Lenin's disciple and his vow to continue with Lenin's legacy gained him further popularity. It would be fair to say that a mixture of clever political moves, opportunity and luck assisted Stalin's rise to power, along with a wiliness to carry out the smallest of tasks to give himself more control, taking every chance possible to become more powerful. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How did Joseph Stalin rise to power?

    Also, many of the politicians underestimated Stalin due to the fact that he was very quiet and never participated that much, this led to him being described as a 'grey blur' by his political colleagues. As a consequence he was able to do many things, such as form a triumvirate with Kamenev and Zinoviev, and not get noticed.

  2. Why did Stalin win the struggle for power in 1923 – 9?

    Stalin cleverly built up tremendous support throughout the ranks of the CPSU and especially the Politburo. They were to elect one of the two, and Bukharin really had no chance at all. Nikolai Ivanovich Bukharin was obviously also considered a threat as he was executed by Stalin in 1938 on suspicion of treason.

  1. Why did Stalin win the struggle to power?

    When Trotsky published the "Lessons of October", he attacked Zinoviev and Kameniev, two strong members of the Communist Party. This, once again, allowed Stalin to attack Trotsky making claims of Trotsky being a factionalist and breaking up the party. Such traits were loathed by Party members due to the 1921

  2. Why did Stalin Rise to Power?

    Lenin's testament was damning of Stalin, describing him as "too rude" and urging other communists to see he never came to power. This testament would have ended Stalin's political career due to Lenin's deified status in the USSR. However, there was a great error made by Stalin's political enemies.

  1. History - Mussolini's Rise to Power

    They probably had their own views that there was no need in attempting to nullify a substantial Blackshirt presence because, as is hinted later by the ultimately 'staged' March on Rome (as opposed to a coup), it was improbable, or maybe even unfeasible that there would be a violent seizure of power.

  2. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    War The Nationalists had expected the war to "make Italians" and in reality some progress had been made. The shared hardships, urbanisation and the army's use of the Italian language helped; I believe that the war further divided Italy more than it united her.

  1. Who gained the most from the Lichfield House Compact

    Rent was increasing in the countryside and unemployment growing in towns. By 1835 it was estimated that over 2million people were unemployed for 30 weeks of the year. In 1836 the Whigs sent George Nicholls to suggest a solution. After a brief investigation, he recommended that Ireland be given a

  2. Can Napoleon's rise to power merely be attributed to his control of the government?'

    It is widely believed that it was due to his father Carlo's efforts to make it clear that his family was loyal to the French and of noble rank that Napoleon was able to be educated in France. The circumstances of Napoleon's upbringing is a factor which contributed to his

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work