• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalins Rise to Power

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Urvi Mittal History SL How did Stalin emerge As the Sole Leader of Russia? 1. The Main Contenders: * Stalin 1) After the October revolution, Stalin was made Commissar for Nationalities in the new government. 2) He became close to Lenin, and gained his trust as a Bolshevik operator. 3) Luck favoured Stalin more than Trotsky. 4) He was appointed head of the Workers' and Peasants' Union. 5) He was put in charge of the Orgburo by Lenin, which controlled aspects of the party organization. 6) He was also elected to the Politburo, which was the main organ of power, and he was elected General Secretary of the party in 1922. 7) His appointment to these positions shows how his power had grown, and how much Lenin trusted him. * Trotsky 1) He was almost equal to Lenin in intellect and in his writings on Marxist theory. 2) Good orator 3) Popular with younger more radical elements in the party. 4) He was the one who had persuaded Lenin to wait till the end of October to carry out the Revolution. 5) His organization of the Red army had helped win the civil war. 6) His position as Commissar for War gave him a strong base in the army. Factors working against him- 1) ...read more.

Middle

They feared a dictator could emerge to take control of the centralized state which had developed by 1924. They feared Trotsky as he was in a powerful position as commander of the Red Army. After Lenin's death they were concerned about the unity of the party, as unity was needed to turn the population into socialists. They therefore could not afford a leader who might cause splits amongst the party and it was Trotsky who they feared might do this. 2) The NEP and industrialization debate. The issue that was debated was how the economy should be run. They agreed that by industrialization they would create a large class of proletarian workers which would help the road to socialism. The NEP was hindering the progress to socialism as it was intensifying the difference between rich and poor as well as leading to gambling and prostitution. Also after 1925 there were serious problems. They could not agree from where the resources to carry on industry which had reached its pre- 1913 level would come from. There was unemployment amongst workers. Their wages did not keep pace with the rising prices of consumer goods. Food shortages began to reappear. All the party members had only accepted the NEP as a temporary system but the debate was when and how it should be ended. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also, Trotsky did not go out of the way to develop or build up his power base, and therefore Stalin was able to erode the one he had already built up. Like all the other contenders, he too underestimated Stalin, and therefore was easily outsmarted by him, since he was perceived as dull and mediocre, therefore no one saw him as a great threat until it was too late, when he was determined to protect his power base, and make sure he was not ousted. 7. Trotsky's weaknesses and errors of judgment were crucial in his defeat, since he was not witnessed as a loyal member of the party, having joined only in 1917; many thought he may try to become a dictator. Also, he was high minded and arrogant, dismissive of his colleagues. He was respected, but he did not engender affection or personal loyalty. He was perceived as the one most likely to cause splits in the party. Also, he did not like getting involved in the 'drudgery of politics'. He was not good at political intrigue, making alliances and trade-offs. 8. Stalin was vastly underestimated by his opponents, seen as only a 'grey blur', so by the time they realized what a great threat he was, it was too late. He had already established himself as a contender, one of the most dangerous ones as well as most likely to succeed, in the power struggle. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How successful were Stalin's economic policies?

    Skilled workers were also given higher wages in order to encourage more workers to acquire the skills needed to improve productivity. However, the workers receiving these benefits were very much in the minority. For the majority, working conditions were incredibly harsh, with the plans requiring workers to devote all their energies to achieving targets.

  2. To What Extent was Stalin's Personal Paranoia the Main Reason for the Purges?

    Had someone capitalised on this vulnerable situation of Stalin's, the Purges may never have occurred as Lenin warned people in his Testament that Stalin may not be able to use the power with 'sufficient caution' and in a postscript

  1. Can Napoleon's rise to power merely be attributed to his control of the government?'

    and a seemingly unshakable reputation which enabled him to come to power, another factor not merely, although contributed to, by his control of the army. In Italy he fought a brilliant campaign with a stunning victory and even established sister republics to the north.

  2. Leni Riefenstahl The Propagandist or Artist? A Historiographical Debate.

    Result * The critical acclaim for Olympia began with the film's premiere on April 20, 1938, in Berlin. It won the Grand Prize at that year's International Film Festival in Venice, where it was cited as "the world's best film of 1938".

  1. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    In order to prevent his rival Giolitti gaining power he advised the King of Mussolini's appointment which took place on the 29th October. If this rivalry between Salandra and Giolitti didn't exist then Mussolini's appointment would have been far less likely.

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    This is, admittedly, an extremely hypothetical proposition. but it is not impossible. More concretely, the same sort of rerouting might well have taken place with such more conventional (and far more important) sources of support as individual donations of money and of labour.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Nikolai Bukharin: Although he supported War Communism, he later supported the NEP. After Lenin?s death, he was the most influential member of the party alongside Stalin, supported Stalin?s Socialism in One Country and opposed Trotsky. Helped Stalin defeat the Left Opposition but was expelled from the party in 1937 and executed in 1938.

  2. How significant were the personalities of the contenders to succeed Lenin in accounting for ...

    In hindsight we now know he allowed Stalin to use his powerbase for his own political marketing. This shows the true naivety of Bukharin and how Stalin?s personality completely overshadowed anybody else?s in the politburo. Moreover this shows how truly significant the personalities of every one of Stalin?s contenders were,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work