• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalins Rise to Power

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Urvi Mittal History SL How did Stalin emerge As the Sole Leader of Russia? 1. The Main Contenders: * Stalin 1) After the October revolution, Stalin was made Commissar for Nationalities in the new government. 2) He became close to Lenin, and gained his trust as a Bolshevik operator. 3) Luck favoured Stalin more than Trotsky. 4) He was appointed head of the Workers' and Peasants' Union. 5) He was put in charge of the Orgburo by Lenin, which controlled aspects of the party organization. 6) He was also elected to the Politburo, which was the main organ of power, and he was elected General Secretary of the party in 1922. 7) His appointment to these positions shows how his power had grown, and how much Lenin trusted him. * Trotsky 1) He was almost equal to Lenin in intellect and in his writings on Marxist theory. 2) Good orator 3) Popular with younger more radical elements in the party. 4) He was the one who had persuaded Lenin to wait till the end of October to carry out the Revolution. 5) His organization of the Red army had helped win the civil war. 6) His position as Commissar for War gave him a strong base in the army. Factors working against him- 1) ...read more.

Middle

They feared a dictator could emerge to take control of the centralized state which had developed by 1924. They feared Trotsky as he was in a powerful position as commander of the Red Army. After Lenin's death they were concerned about the unity of the party, as unity was needed to turn the population into socialists. They therefore could not afford a leader who might cause splits amongst the party and it was Trotsky who they feared might do this. 2) The NEP and industrialization debate. The issue that was debated was how the economy should be run. They agreed that by industrialization they would create a large class of proletarian workers which would help the road to socialism. The NEP was hindering the progress to socialism as it was intensifying the difference between rich and poor as well as leading to gambling and prostitution. Also after 1925 there were serious problems. They could not agree from where the resources to carry on industry which had reached its pre- 1913 level would come from. There was unemployment amongst workers. Their wages did not keep pace with the rising prices of consumer goods. Food shortages began to reappear. All the party members had only accepted the NEP as a temporary system but the debate was when and how it should be ended. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also, Trotsky did not go out of the way to develop or build up his power base, and therefore Stalin was able to erode the one he had already built up. Like all the other contenders, he too underestimated Stalin, and therefore was easily outsmarted by him, since he was perceived as dull and mediocre, therefore no one saw him as a great threat until it was too late, when he was determined to protect his power base, and make sure he was not ousted. 7. Trotsky's weaknesses and errors of judgment were crucial in his defeat, since he was not witnessed as a loyal member of the party, having joined only in 1917; many thought he may try to become a dictator. Also, he was high minded and arrogant, dismissive of his colleagues. He was respected, but he did not engender affection or personal loyalty. He was perceived as the one most likely to cause splits in the party. Also, he did not like getting involved in the 'drudgery of politics'. He was not good at political intrigue, making alliances and trade-offs. 8. Stalin was vastly underestimated by his opponents, seen as only a 'grey blur', so by the time they realized what a great threat he was, it was too late. He had already established himself as a contender, one of the most dangerous ones as well as most likely to succeed, in the power struggle. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How successful were Stalin's economic policies?

    The Stakhanovite movement, which swept the country in 1935 after a coal worker - Alexei Stakhanov - mined 102 tons of coal in one shift, mined encouraged workers to exceed their targets and provided an accessible image for workers to aspire to.

  2. Can Napoleon's rise to power merely be attributed to his control of the government?'

    It meant the Directors had to give up on legality to keep order and rely more on force and so the people became very used to it. When Napoleon used the army to take over no one really took any notice they were so used to the idea.

  1. Leni Riefenstahl The Propagandist or Artist? A Historiographical Debate.

    Prizes were also awarded by the Greek and Swedish governments. * Riefenstahl's permission to travel abroad to promote Olympia on various propaganda tours, including to the United States, was also, by this time, a rare privilege for members of the Nazi artistic elite.

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    According to Shliapnikov, they had also been on the verge of merging the Bolshevik Petrograd organization with the Mezhraionsty. All this was brought to an abrupt end by the "virtual coup d'etat" (to use Daniels' phrase) occasioned by the return from Siberian exile of such notables as Stalin, Kamenev and M.K.

  1. History - Mussolini's Rise to Power

    It is apparent that although there were clear weaknesses in the oppositions' ranks, these were not pertinent without taking into account Mussolini's opportunist approach towards them. One of the most substantial methods by which they increased their appeal was through their fluctuating message.

  2. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    the fascists, for example Marshall Diaz is reported to have told him "the army will do its duty; however it would be well not to put it to the test"11 The King also feared that his cousin, The Duke of Aosta who was near the Fascist headquarters in Perugia may have been after the crown.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Nikolai Bukharin: Although he supported War Communism, he later supported the NEP. After Lenin?s death, he was the most influential member of the party alongside Stalin, supported Stalin?s Socialism in One Country and opposed Trotsky. Helped Stalin defeat the Left Opposition but was expelled from the party in 1937 and executed in 1938.

  2. How significant were the personalities of the contenders to succeed Lenin in accounting for ...

    Trotksy also had many weaknesses which let him down to succeed Lenin's place as he was sick frequently and was therefore missing committee meetings, which Stalin exploited and made sure that important decisions were made whilst Trotsky was off getting treatment.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work