• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study all the sources. Using all these sources and your own knowledge, assess the view that the rise of the Labour party was the greatest political challenge to the Liberal party in the period of 1906-1914

Extracts from this document...


Study all the sources. Using all these sources and your own knowledge, assess the view that the rise of the Labour party was the greatest political challenge to the Liberal party in the period of 1906-1914 All four sources I will use to answer the question are from different perspectives at different periods of time and all have a different level of relevance. For instance, the source dated 1906 has more relevance to the view than the source from 1981. Also, with the varied levels of favouritism towards each party, the opinions and views towards the statement that the rise of Labour was the greatest challenge for the Liberals. Source A is the only source with a Liberal view whilst Source B is the only of the sources with a Labour perspective; Source C is from a Tory viewpoint and Source D is the only of the four to have a neutral opinion. Source A is from October 1906 and is by David Lloyd George at a time he was the President of the Board of Trade. Due to his role in the Liberal government, who had just been put into power, he is heavily narrow-minded towards the Liberal preferences. However, as the speech was made just after the 1906 general election, the speech is not a persuasive vote-seeker, but rather a warning to his party about the Labour uprising. The Liberals had just been voted into power which left them vulnerable and needed to answer questions on their policies with relevant action. ?I can tell the Liberals now what will make this Independent Labour party into a powerful force that is capable of sweeping away Liberalism? ? this quote has a tone of desperation for Lloyd George who seemingly respects the Labour party and believes they have the potential to ruin the Liberals and their policies. However, the Liberal minister offers a solution to this problem: ?But if the Liberals tackle these great problems of extreme poverty now, then the Labour party will call in vain for the workers to desert Liberalism and join with a rival political group?. ...read more.


who could not break the deadlock with the Conservatives seen in the January 1910 election - did not get a majority vote and went on to form a coalition with the Irish Nationalists in return for their policy of the ?home rule?. The fact that the Liberals were unable to get a majority of seats in the House of Common proved to be worry for Lloyd George. Between 1906 ? the date source A was produced - and the time of this source - 1911, the Liberals produced several reforms that targeted large sections of the public ? i.e. the Old Age Pensions Act and People?s Budget amongst others. The choice of mode for the text ? a diary ? meant that Webb?s views were not able to be spread nationwide and makes it seem more personal, whilst Lloyd George?s speech was exposed nationally and was intended to do so. For this reason, Source A seems to be more effective than B in showing how the Liberals planned to deal with the problems they faced rather than Beatrice Webb?s personal document. This Source was produced at a similar time to Source C ? a satirical piece of propaganda from weekly magazine Punch in 1912 so therefore this was also after the two General Elections of 1910. The 1910 election saw the number of Conservative MPs voted in rise from 156 to 271, whilst Liberals decreased from 397 to 272 ? therefore a coalition was created between the Liberals and Irish Nationalists. The message of the source is that the Conservatives gained from the conflict between the Liberal and Labour parties in reference to the General Election that had just previously occurred. The caption is ?The Triangular Test? referring to the ongoing battle between the three parties, and creates the idea that the Labour party did not only ruin Liberals amount of votes, but its own through its disputes with the Liberals. ...read more.


The general overview of the Source is that the Labour party had the opportunity to gain from the declining Liberal party, who were losing many working-class voters and becoming increasingly unpopular. This therefore connotes that the Conservatives gained voters that their policies were not aimed at in the slightest, which shows a real disturbance to the equilibrium of the government. Not only did the Liberal party decline, but the alleged uprising of the Labour party wasn?t effective and did not gain voters in the areas it should have. With the working-class favouring the upper-class approaches, this shows that the country was in a real state and the calling for a new government was certainly valid. Although Lloyd George predicted a Labour uprising, and changed his approach to abolish this, the Labour party still had a negative impact on the Liberal party?s electoral campaigns. However, these conflicts between the Labour and Liberal parties were in-fact beneficial for the Conservative party who gained votes and MPs. They took a professional approach whilst the Labour and Liberal parties conflicted with one another, and this created a sense of reassurance and security for their supporters. Nevertheless, this decline was created by the threat of the Labour party, and although they did not capitalise from the downfall, they did have a negative impact on the Liberal?s chances. I believe that the greatest challenge for the Liberals was the Labour uprising as it forced them into changing their approach, pushing through policies/reforms and consequently lost them votes and was forced into forming a coalition in the December 1910 General Election. The Liberal party went from a strong force to a vulnerable government in a matter of a few years, and this was because of the Labour impact and a decrease in votes. In summary, the Conservatives may have benefited from the Labour impact on the Liberal downfall, but the Labour party were the cause of this. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Liberal Reforms (1906-1914)

    4 star(s)

    The government was not enthusiastic about this proposal, as it knew that inspection would inevitably reveal chronic health problems and would be costly. Morant smuggled the school medical inspection provisions into the innocuous Bill, which was seen as a formality therefore was not thoroughly read through by the government.

  2. Why did the Liberals win and the Conservatives lose the 1906 Election?

    They would have therefore voted for the liberals, so that they could express to the conservatives they did not approve of the 1902 education act. Above, I have outlined the main strengths that the liberal party had, which may have attracted votes away from the conservatives thus winning the 1906 election.

  1. To what extent could the Liberal reforms of 1906-1914 be described as a radical ...

    Murray illustrates this view in his work: 'The social reforms of the pre-war Liberal government had no opportunity to make a major dent in the extent of poverty before the Great War, but there is some evidence to suggest that they began to make a difference in the long term.'

  2. Use your own knowledge to assess how far the Sources support the interpretation that ...

    Also noticing that source B was reported in September 1912 when the bill was actually introduced, while as Source C was recorded in January 1913, the year between them would have increased the political arguments and most likely the situation would get much more extreme and difficult the further we get into the years.

  1. The Successes of Labour from 1945

    As a result, many voters were still influenced by the 1949 devaluation, which was seen at the time as a national humiliation. If Attlee had waited a few more months longer, public perceptions of the economy might have been different.

  2. Assess the claim that the House of Lords provided the most serious opposition tothe ...

    Many saw this level of government intervention as preventing self-help, decreasing incentive, and encouraging dependency on the state. This animosity against the reform from traditional Liberals was shown for example by the Liberal journalist and editor of the Economist, F.

  1. How liberal were the Tories from 1821 to 1827?

    to reduce crime, despite that fact that at first they were seen as an attack on English liberties. It helped to liberalise society by introducing a less extreme way to persecute people, and after a number of years the policemen became accepted and respected in society.

  2. Study all the sources. Use your own knowledge to assess how unlikely a permanent ...

    Source D also comes from Connolly during the Easter Rising, and is the proclamation of Irish independence. He was one of seven signatories to this proclamation of this rebellion period, and he was in charge of the General Post Office at this time.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work