• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of problems faced by U.S soldiers in Vietnam? Use the source and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Jack Eyres History coursework Question 2 History coursework: Study source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of problems faced by U.S soldiers in Vietnam? Use the source and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer. Introduction In this question I will be trying to answer possibilities and analyse them about source A. I will decide whether or not I agree with the interpretation of the situation faced by American soldiers in Vietnam. The soldiers faced many problems and I will be trying to analyse them to see if they are true or not. Also I will be trying to find out were the facts came from and if they provide enough evidence, and are reliable enough to work from. In the source it says that an increasing number of new recruits scored so low on their intelligence tests that if they were to apply to join the peacetime army they wouldn't have got in. ...read more.

Middle

The source says that the majority of the deaths took place in the first six months. This is understandable; the soldiers eager to fight would get a bit too over enthusiastic. They would be naive and think that they could handle it, and they would of all felt very patriotic and proud that they were fighting for their country but in fact they were just putting themselves up to be killed. After a new set of recruits would have came in, the older recruits; growing in experience, would have let them do it all, just to try and save themselves. 'Just as a soldier began gaining experience he was sent home'. This is true and this could have been one of the factors that led to the defeat of the U.S army. How could the Americans hope to win the war if they knew that they were constantly throwing inexperienced men against highly skilled, trained guerrillas on their home ground? ...read more.

Conclusion

Conclusion In the source it shows many aspects and areas of problems that the soldiers could have come across. It mentions about cold hard facts that I know are true, but there are also some other facts and points that I cannot prove and there is no evidence to support that they were true. The source was written by Michael Bilton and was published in 1992. I did some background research and it illustrates that Michael Bilton used primary sources of evidence and used accounts from eye witnesses. This make the source more reliable to a wider extent, He is a well known writer of fact books which make it easier for us to believe that the book is true. The source we do have does have some parts that aren't recorded in the text. So if we had a more complete source and more facts then, I would have a better understanding and interpretation of the source. The source is good because it mentions some good facts, but the source is also equally weak when it comes to the amount of evidence. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. What can you learn from Source A about the reasons for US involvement in ...

    was successful as it reached a wider audience than soldiers' letters home did. Source L demonstrates that the USA was becoming arrogant and that the USA was trying to force its ideas and products on other countries, in particular Vietnam.

  2. American History.

    laid out a semi-feudal hierarchical society [it really was Locke, not kidding here]. Still, Carolina ended up splitting into two separate centers, which split into separate colonies in 1729. Virginia planters settled North Carolina, establishing a society very similar to their own; wealthy planters from Barbados settled South Carolina, and,

  1. Hiroshima Coursework This piece of coursework will concentrate on three questions, all source based.

    This is not at all surprising that Truman does not state it was wrong for the bomb to be dropped. This source contradicts with source E. Source G is from an interview made in 1963 with Saburo Hayashi, secretary to the Japanese War Minister in 1945.

  2. Does Source C show that the anti-war protests described in Source A had an ...

    Napalm burst into flames on impact. The bombs covered everything they hit with burning jelly, causing people's flesh to blister and melt. Agent orange would be dropped on huge areas of jungle, stripping the area to the bare soil. Large areas of land would be left cratered, scorched and desert. Crops were lost and families starved.

  1. History Coursework on Hammersmith and Fulham

    In source M he states that some children had been evacuated without their mothers, which would lead to a very great strain on the women of the welcoming household and as a result of this the children would end up running wild.

  2. The Home Front - source related study

    war and that women volunteering to work in industry was a necessity. The source is a form of propaganda as it shows the governments attitude not reality. The source is also useful as it shows a link between men and women as behind the women in the picture there is a soldier waving goodbye and going to war.

  1. A study of Bobby Fischer, Boris Spassky, the 1972 FIDE Chess Title Match, and ...

    The difference between Bobby and other players was obvious: Boris Spassky once said that "chess is like life."(8) Fischer, however, put it more bluntly: "Chess is life."(9) NOT QUITE RUSSIA'S CROWN JEWEL OF CHESS The Soviet Union was a chess-mad nation.

  2. what the Americans did in My Lai source work

    It also complies with my knowledge of the tactics used in the war; this also shows how hard it was to fight the Guerrilla warfare tactics. Furthermore, I know that the soldiers were not as intelligent as was expected, and they didn't have as much military experience as was previously required.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work