• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The achievement of the new deal is a myth. The USA's economic recovery came with the outbreak of the Second World War." How far do these sources support this view?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The achievement of the new deal is a myth. The USA's economic recovery came with the outbreak of the Second World War." How far do these sources support this view? It is arguable how far the sources help to answer the question as some answer some parts and other sources answer other parts. The New Deal could be called a myth as far as helping the economic recovery is concerned. Evidence of this is given in source I as the information shows that the economy recovers the most when the USA enters the war the economy goes back, near enough, to what it was before the war and one year into the war the economy is actually better than it was before the crash and depression! The New deal also never helped to solve the underlying American economic problems. Sources A, C, & G, are the ones which mostly oppose the New Deal. Confidence remained low through the 1930's when the New Deal was in operation; American's spent and invested about 75 per-cent of what they had done before 1929. ...read more.

Middle

This leads me to a theory that the country perhaps became slightly too dependent on the New Deal and in fact that the New Deal was not a myth at all in the long run. The war may not have helped as much as the general public and American figurehead's made out. Economy had started improving before the world war anyway, at a steady rate. This therefore means that it wasn't purely because of the world war that the economy recovered, as it was already showing signs of improvement before America entered the war. Unemployment was falling greatly until Roosevelt cut the budget on the New Deal, after which it started to rise again slightly. Therefore, this does give proof that the New Deal did help the economy recover again because a year after the budget was cut, unemployment figures went up again. The war did help a great deal on improving the economy a great deal and this is shown mostly in source I as when America enters the war the unemployment decreased a lot, this is probably because of ...read more.

Conclusion

I conclude that it is for the above reasons that I believe that the statement, "The achievement of the new deal is a myth. The USA's economic recovery came with the outbreak of the Second World War," is not very true and is bias. The sources are useful in helping interpret this, especially source I although some sources are not as helpful as others. If I had to place their support on the view in a scale of one to ten I would place it around 4 because they do not actually support the view in general, although they do help to put forward the opposite argument. The figures and data given before the America entered war give evidence which proves that the New Deal did reduce the unemployment rate, and entering the war just sped up the process and created many more jobs therefore chopping unemployment. Although the war may have helped to speed up the economic recovery, it is unfair to state that the New Deal was entirely a 'myth' as it clearly did help America and the unemployment problems created within the country as a whole. Joe Turner 11T ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Discuss Trotsky's View that War was the Locomotive of History (1855-1914)

    By the spring of 1906, revolution had again been narrowly avoided by a combination of appeasement and force. The revolution as a direct result of War, managed to unite all classes and yet still not be able to end Tsarism.

  2. In what ways did the Second World War affect the lives of ordinary people ...

    Most were normal children, others from schools and hospitals etc. This huge amount of people who were confused and uneducated about the situation inevitably posed many problems to the process. For a start most people had no idea of where they were heading, for they were not told before hand

  1. Total War, Britain during the Second World War

    In fact the real number was fifty-nine. But even this was a great victory. The losses were too high for the Germans to accept over a long period and there were no more daylight attacks. The Blitz After the failure of the Luftwaffe to defeat Fighter Command, the Germans began to bomb London and other British cities by night.

  2. The Economic "Miracle".

    People of Plenty A. The Consumer Culture Middle class during 1950's became more aware of consumer goods. This was due to consumer credit increasing 800%, because of credit cards, and easy payment plans. Products like TVS, dishwashers, garbage disposals, and dishwashers became more common. Automobiles were becoming more stylish.

  1. Use the sources and your knowledge of American history to explain why there has ...

    FDR was thought of as being a very interventionist, and very public President, because of the degree of control he had in the lives of the American people, and because of the 'Fireside chats' that he had on the radio talking to the public.

  2. After the collapse of the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, the world ...

    are not symptoms that are only prevalent in Africa, but are also found throughout the entire world, therefore, becoming factors that will shape the nature of the future world order and according to Kaplan drive it into anarchy. Kaplan explains that environmental problems such as scarcity of natural resources are a threat to the stability of nations.

  1. To What extent was Germany Responsible for the outbreak of World War One?

    Their need to repress voices of dissent at home and to finally achieve their long desired "place in the sun5" meant they saw war as a solution to their problems. By pledging their support to Austria they set in motion a chain of events that led to war and without the blank cheque, may not have happened.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Bashir Gemayel then announced that all of the individual militias of the various parties of the Lebanese Front would disband and their troops combine as one fighting force under his command in the Lebanese Forces. Gemayel persevered in his plot to embroil Israel in a full scale war with Syria.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work