• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The achievement of the new deal is a myth. The USA's economic recovery came with the outbreak of the Second World War." How far do these sources support this view?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The achievement of the new deal is a myth. The USA's economic recovery came with the outbreak of the Second World War." How far do these sources support this view? It is arguable how far the sources help to answer the question as some answer some parts and other sources answer other parts. The New Deal could be called a myth as far as helping the economic recovery is concerned. Evidence of this is given in source I as the information shows that the economy recovers the most when the USA enters the war the economy goes back, near enough, to what it was before the war and one year into the war the economy is actually better than it was before the crash and depression! The New deal also never helped to solve the underlying American economic problems. Sources A, C, & G, are the ones which mostly oppose the New Deal. Confidence remained low through the 1930's when the New Deal was in operation; American's spent and invested about 75 per-cent of what they had done before 1929. ...read more.

Middle

This leads me to a theory that the country perhaps became slightly too dependent on the New Deal and in fact that the New Deal was not a myth at all in the long run. The war may not have helped as much as the general public and American figurehead's made out. Economy had started improving before the world war anyway, at a steady rate. This therefore means that it wasn't purely because of the world war that the economy recovered, as it was already showing signs of improvement before America entered the war. Unemployment was falling greatly until Roosevelt cut the budget on the New Deal, after which it started to rise again slightly. Therefore, this does give proof that the New Deal did help the economy recover again because a year after the budget was cut, unemployment figures went up again. The war did help a great deal on improving the economy a great deal and this is shown mostly in source I as when America enters the war the unemployment decreased a lot, this is probably because of ...read more.

Conclusion

I conclude that it is for the above reasons that I believe that the statement, "The achievement of the new deal is a myth. The USA's economic recovery came with the outbreak of the Second World War," is not very true and is bias. The sources are useful in helping interpret this, especially source I although some sources are not as helpful as others. If I had to place their support on the view in a scale of one to ten I would place it around 4 because they do not actually support the view in general, although they do help to put forward the opposite argument. The figures and data given before the America entered war give evidence which proves that the New Deal did reduce the unemployment rate, and entering the war just sped up the process and created many more jobs therefore chopping unemployment. Although the war may have helped to speed up the economic recovery, it is unfair to state that the New Deal was entirely a 'myth' as it clearly did help America and the unemployment problems created within the country as a whole. Joe Turner 11T ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. In what ways did the Second World War affect the lives of ordinary people ...

    The stations were dense with people saying their good byes or finding luggage or lost siblings, this caused great confusion and the distress of moving to an unknown location built up tensions of fear resulting in anger. Smaller children who didn't understand the situation must have felt distraught at leaving

  2. To What extent was Germany Responsible for the outbreak of World War One?

    prime strategic position and the growth of nationalism which led to a desire for self determination and so conflict. Schmitt argued that "more than any other circumstances this conflict between existing governments and their unhappy minorities was responsible for the catastrophe of 1914"12.

  1. Discuss Trotsky's View that War was the Locomotive of History (1855-1914)

    of Europe should not obscure the very real and dramatic impact it had on contemporary Russia. No such attempt at change, can transform a large society at a stroke. Despite the many shortcomings of the emancipation decree the war contributed to the realisation that such change needed to be dealt

  2. The great war plan, preparations, collapse, and recovery - a revised view

    * On June 22, 1941, Germany, together with its allies (Finland, Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria, Italy), invaded Russia in a gigantic surprise attack. * The mighty German military, the most efficient in the world then, applied its successful Blitzkrieg tactic, and the terrible unpreparedness and deployment in concentrations close to the

  1. Total War, Britain during the Second World War

    But not everybody received the same rations. A committee was set up to decide how much nutrition people in different jobs required. Workers in heavy industry received more, as did pregnant women. Workers in office jobs received less. Special supplements were made available for young children; orange juice and cod liver oil became common and lasted long after the war.

  2. How did USA Change during the Second World War?

    Despite spending a high amount of the nation's money, Americans were told this was essential to create full employment and a higher standard of living. There was a general agreement that such a role should continue after the war. With the Government of USA spending millions of dollars on funding the war, the future of their economy was looking bleak.

  1. Keith Sinclair has labelled New Zealanders the

    the case in August 1915, one of the conditions for militarism is achieved: politics have been dominated by military imperatives. In World War Two, Savage, the Labour Prime Minister, and his party accustomed themselves to the fact that war was inevitable, while infringing the principles they had always stuck to- peace and anti-militarism2.

  2. After the collapse of the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, the world ...

    However, he answered this by pointing out, in reaction to September 11 that we are still in the "End of History", as history for him is "the progress over the centuries towards modernity, characterized by institutions like democracy and capitalism."4 He supports this by arguing that terrorism would not stop

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work