• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The achievement of the new deal is a myth. The USA's economic recovery came with the outbreak of the Second World War." How far do these sources support this view?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The achievement of the new deal is a myth. The USA's economic recovery came with the outbreak of the Second World War." How far do these sources support this view? It is arguable how far the sources help to answer the question as some answer some parts and other sources answer other parts. The New Deal could be called a myth as far as helping the economic recovery is concerned. Evidence of this is given in source I as the information shows that the economy recovers the most when the USA enters the war the economy goes back, near enough, to what it was before the war and one year into the war the economy is actually better than it was before the crash and depression! The New deal also never helped to solve the underlying American economic problems. Sources A, C, & G, are the ones which mostly oppose the New Deal. Confidence remained low through the 1930's when the New Deal was in operation; American's spent and invested about 75 per-cent of what they had done before 1929. ...read more.

Middle

This leads me to a theory that the country perhaps became slightly too dependent on the New Deal and in fact that the New Deal was not a myth at all in the long run. The war may not have helped as much as the general public and American figurehead's made out. Economy had started improving before the world war anyway, at a steady rate. This therefore means that it wasn't purely because of the world war that the economy recovered, as it was already showing signs of improvement before America entered the war. Unemployment was falling greatly until Roosevelt cut the budget on the New Deal, after which it started to rise again slightly. Therefore, this does give proof that the New Deal did help the economy recover again because a year after the budget was cut, unemployment figures went up again. The war did help a great deal on improving the economy a great deal and this is shown mostly in source I as when America enters the war the unemployment decreased a lot, this is probably because of ...read more.

Conclusion

I conclude that it is for the above reasons that I believe that the statement, "The achievement of the new deal is a myth. The USA's economic recovery came with the outbreak of the Second World War," is not very true and is bias. The sources are useful in helping interpret this, especially source I although some sources are not as helpful as others. If I had to place their support on the view in a scale of one to ten I would place it around 4 because they do not actually support the view in general, although they do help to put forward the opposite argument. The figures and data given before the America entered war give evidence which proves that the New Deal did reduce the unemployment rate, and entering the war just sped up the process and created many more jobs therefore chopping unemployment. Although the war may have helped to speed up the economic recovery, it is unfair to state that the New Deal was entirely a 'myth' as it clearly did help America and the unemployment problems created within the country as a whole. Joe Turner 11T ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. To What extent was Germany Responsible for the outbreak of World War One?

    They also increased feelings of solidarity between Russia and Serbia, the Tsar declaring in February 1914, "For Serbia, we shall do everything"14. The importance of the growth of nationalism and the denial of self determination cannot be ignored in the debate on the origins of WW1 as they greatly added

  2. Discuss Trotsky's View that War was the Locomotive of History (1855-1914)

    The corruption and the inefficiency of the government were exposed in the conduct of the war. Transportation broke down and bread prices soared up. The Tsarist government was totally discredited in the eyes of the Russian people. In July 1904, shortly after the Russian defeat at the Yalu, the unpopular

  1. In what ways did the Second World War affect the lives of ordinary people ...

    aware of the imminent threat posed by bombing thus persuading them to leave their children in the houses of strangers. In 1939 there was the largest mass evacuation of people in Britain's history, from major cities and 3.5 million people were arranged to be evacuated to reception areas.

  2. Use the sources and your knowledge of American history to explain why there has ...

    FDR was thought of as being a very interventionist, and very public President, because of the degree of control he had in the lives of the American people, and because of the 'Fireside chats' that he had on the radio talking to the public.

  1. Total War, Britain during the Second World War

    The Battle of Britain In July the Germans began to attack British targets. At first they bombed shipping in the English Channel and then attacked ports on the south coast and radar stations, but from the middle of August they attacked the Royal Air Force (RAF).

  2. After the collapse of the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, the world ...

    Kaplan gives an example mentioning a foreseen conflict between Egypt and Ethiopia over water.8 Kaplan also mentions that over population will cause a lot of refugee migration and thus dissolve the borders between nations, as migrants take along with them their culture making the borders illustrated in maps useless.9 According

  1. How did USA Change during the Second World War?

    Despite spending a high amount of the nation's money, Americans were told this was essential to create full employment and a higher standard of living. There was a general agreement that such a role should continue after the war. With the Government of USA spending millions of dollars on funding the war, the future of their economy was looking bleak.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    South Lebanon's Shias had long suffered under Palestinian domination, and Shia villagers welcomed the advancing Israelis by showering them with rice and flowers. This traditional form of homage, later repeated by the Druze and Christian populations, lent credence to the Israeli claim that it was "liberating" Lebanon.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work