• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Arab-Israeli conflict.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Arab-Israeli Conflict "Have powers from outside the Middle East helped or hindered in the search for a resolution to the Arab-Israeli conflict since 1948?" This coursework will focus on the countries outside the Middle East who have helped or hindered and how in the search of a resolution (if a resolution has been achieved or not). The key points which will be purposeful are:- Powers - this refers to the countries outside the Middle East who had power. Helped - this refers to the countries that have helped find a solution. Hindered - this refers to the countries who had led the warring countries astray in finding a resolution. Resolution - This refers to if a solution to the problem of the conflict was found or not. This coursework will start with the history/origins of the conflict. In the First World War when Turkey joined forces with Germany, Britain wrote a letter to Sheriff Hussein of Mecca. Britain persuaded the Arab countries to up rise against their Turkish rulers, promising the Arabs that Great Britain is prepared to recognise and support the independence of all Arab states after the war. One of the key roles was sir McMahon's letter, who was the British High Commissioner in Egypt. A letter was written to McMahon of what was wanted. This letter of Hussein's was responded to by McMahon, but this letter was a problem as one part of the letter was in the interpretation of the alteration proposed by McMahon and the other part was in the phrase 'when the situation allows.' This was the beginning of the problems. The Arabs were not totally convinced of British pledges but this letter was enough for the Arabs to rise in revolt against the Turks. The Arabs accepted Britain's promises and set out an army against the Turks. In 1918, the Turks were defeated. It seemed as though independence would be given. ...read more.

Middle

The USSR also said that it was thinking of 'flattening' Israel. After many threats which included monetary and military threats, Britain, France and Israel were all strained to leave. As a result a UN emergency force was set-up on the border between Egypt and Israel to keep peace. The USA, USSR and the UN played a fundamental role in this war as they were trying to help find a resolution and make peace between the two participants. Britain and France on the other hand, were only using Israel in between to get the Suez Canal back. Israel took the offer up and used it as a chance of invasion. Britain and France had hindered the progress of Israel and the Arab states for their own reasons. The UN had also played a worthy role in demanding the British, French and Israeli troops out of Egypt but could not have done it without the individual's help of USA and USSR. Nasser, as a result, became a leading Arab figure with the help of the USSR and used this position to plan another war in 1967. In 1966, the army took over the government and took a forceful approach towards Israel, in Syria; its troops were concerted on the Golan Heights. On the 16 of May Nasser ordered the UN troops who were situated on the borders of Egypt to have Egyptian territory, Nasser also closed the Gulf of Aqaba to Israeli ships. Syria decreed war against Israel, Jordan and Egypt offered help and began to join forces. Israel however, was not prejudiced by fright, especially due to the assurances from America as to there would be no 'restraint'. On 5 May Israel attacked on the Arab states even before the Arab sates attacked. This was an advanced attack in self-defence which was known as being pre-emptive. The Israelis taking full control of the skies on the first day quickly and promptly defeated the Arab countries, occupied the Sinai penisula, Gaza Strip and the West Bank. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Americans were not consulted and so were very angry. Although the Israeli Army successfully seized the Sinai but the American government insisted that the Israelis should withdraw. In 1967 Israel went to war against Egypt, Syria and Jordan. Having learnt a lesson previously, the Israelis only attacked when some of the Americans. When the Israelis were shocked with a surprise attack by the Egyptians, USA airlifted emergency supplies of arms to Israel. This shows that Israel was given full support to by the USA. On the other hand, the USSR provided support for the Arab States; in return the Soviet used Egyptian ports. However when Sadat come to power he expelled soviet advisor from his county in 1972 and moved closer to the USA. The Americans used their new relationship to bring about a peace deal between Israel and Egypt. Jimmy Carter brought Sadat and Begin together at camp David, where they agreed the details of a peace treaty. As a result American influence in Israel increased. In my opinion, Britain only took part in the conflict when it came to the Suez Canal, as this was the last British intervention in the conflict. Britain and France had obstructed the progress of peace for their own reasons and got Israel involved in the 1956 war. USA, on the other hand, hindered and helped in the search of a resolution, as in the war of 1973, when oil was used as a weapon, USA quickly sided with the Arab countries, thus hindered. However, the closer the events to the present day situation, USA managed for the two states to meet at camp David and came to an agreement, thus helped in the search of a resolution. The Soviet Union, provided help for the Arab countries in return for huge gifts of weaponry soviet naval ships used Egyptian ports, and Soviet exploration planes flew from Cairo airport. Thus the Soviet Union was behind a deal. Also providing either party, Arabs or Israelis with weapons was clearly a push factor of war between the two and creating extreme tense situations. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    Within such a frame of reference, the lessons of history and of ideological incompatibility seemed to permit no possibility of compromise. But Roosevelt clearly felt that there was a third way, a path of mutual accommodation that would sustain and nourish the prospects of postwar partnership without ignoring the realities of geopolitics.

  2. Armed forces.

    - 83); Second Continental congress at Philadelphia Thomas Crapper invents WC 1776 Declaration of Independence; Battle of Bunker Hill; French support for colonies; Cook's third voyage (1776 - 79) Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire; Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations 1777 British take New York and Philadelphia but

  1. The Arab-Israeli conflict 1956, 1967 and 1973.

    The armies of Syria, Egypt and Jordan were also put under joint control. President Nasser also persuaded King Hussein of Jordan to help the Fedayeen by allowing them to go through Jordanian territory, to carry out their attacks. The west were frightened of losing their influence in the Middle East

  2. In what ways was the Pacific war a racist conflict?

    We'll look at the cartoons first; the first of which was published in 1942. It might well be useful to give you the translations for this. It was entitled "purging one's head of Anglo-Americanism". The caption reads "Get rid of that dandruff encrusting your head!"

  1. Europe and the Suez Crisis 1956 - To what extent was the military action ...

    This can to some extent be true, as the Suez Crisis was an event in the Cold War, when the British and French democracies tried to, together with America, contain the expanding Communist bloc. However, other possible interpretations of the Crisis and the British and French intentions contradict this view.

  2. American History.

    [since Congress couldn't decide what to do, Taylor had told CA to apply for admission directly]. - Southerners, however, wouldn't accept CA as a free state b/c it would upset the delicate balance between free and slave states - so they tried to make CA a slave state or at least extend the Missouri line.

  1. How far do you agree that Israeli victories in successive Arab-Israeli conflicts in the ...

    Their people felt bitter about their humiliation, and it showed how weak and divided they were. However, during the Yom Kippur War the Israelis sustained far more losses than they had in previous wars. This was because they acted together, both in their military planning and their use of their weapons.

  2. Vietnam - Why did the USA withdraw it's troops in 1973?

    The war divided not only the American people, but also the European allies, which made the protest movement an important factor in the American decision to leave Vietnam. The first protest took place in New York in 1963. Then in 1964, a peace rally in Washington DC was attended by 25,000 people.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work