The Bolshevik Consolidation of power 1917-21.

Authors Avatar

The Bolshevik Consolidation of power 1917-21

The dissolution of the constituent assembly

  • Lenin had never thought about winning support from the masses, so he concentrated on creating a party that could seize power when the time was right.  This was why he didn’t join the opposition movements or support the provisional government.
  • Lenin had originally supported the Constituent Assembly but when the election happened and his party won less than a quarter of the seats, dissolved the assembly after just one session as he thought it would have been impossible for his party to govern along side an assembly that was non-Bolshevik.
  • Lenin’s move prompted criticism from within his party and from foreign communists both arguing that he had destroyed democracy and the idea that the people should have say in the running of the country.  

The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, 1918.

  • The Bolsheviks had been against the war and had promised immediate peace if they came into power.  They couldn’t go back on this promise.
  • This is where the differences between Lenin and Trotsky become clear.  Lenin wanted peace immediately while Trotsky wanted to wait.
  • Lenin realised that with the amount of desertions at the front, Russia wouldn’t mount a serious challenge to Germany for much longer so a treaty would be a minor set back if Germany lost the war to Britain and France.
  • Trotsky took the middle road between Lenin and some Bolsheviks and Left revolutionaries who wanted to continue the war.  Although he accepted that Russia couldn’t fight on for much longer, in the hope that Germany would collapse against France and Britain he tried to make peace talks last longer.
  • The treaty was signed on the 3rd of March 1918 after the infuriated Germans threatened to re-start hostilities, but Trotsky took this opportunity to make a nationalist propaganda point.  He got a Soviet representative to declare that the treaty was not freely negotiated but a German Diktat imposed on helpless Russia.
  • In this treaty Russia lost a lot of territory, around a million square kilometres containing 45 million Russians.  Also Russia was expected to pay 3 billion roubles in reparations.
  • Lenin, aware that the signing of such a treaty had caused resentment throughout his Bolsheviks, he stressed that his policy had been realistic.  He argued that Russia could not have carried on with the war as her resources were drained and that Russia needed to recuperate.
  • This resentment caused serious opposition to Lenin’s leadership but his gamble that circumstances on the western front would make the treaty meaningless paid off.  In fact his hold on his party grew stronger and he took the opportunity to expel the left SR’s and outlaw them politically.  

The Russian Civil War, 1918-20.

Join now!

  • The dissolution of the constituent assembly and the subsequent banning of all other political parties made it obvious that the Bolsheviks did not want to share power with anyone else.  This situation made civil war inevitable.
  • But the civil war wasn’t as simple as Red’s versus White’s.  There were different factions of the white army and they weren’t united.  
  • The only common belief within the White army was a common hatred of the Bolsheviks.  The white army was made up of lots of different parties and people who each held different beliefs about what should be done ...

This is a preview of the whole essay