• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Bolshevik Consolidation of power 1917-21.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Bolshevik Consolidation of power 1917-21 The dissolution of the constituent assembly * Lenin had never thought about winning support from the masses, so he concentrated on creating a party that could seize power when the time was right. This was why he didn't join the opposition movements or support the provisional government. * Lenin had originally supported the Constituent Assembly but when the election happened and his party won less than a quarter of the seats, dissolved the assembly after just one session as he thought it would have been impossible for his party to govern along side an assembly that was non-Bolshevik. * Lenin's move prompted criticism from within his party and from foreign communists both arguing that he had destroyed democracy and the idea that the people should have say in the running of the country. The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, 1918. * The Bolsheviks had been against the war and had promised immediate peace if they came into power. They couldn't go back on this promise. * This is where the differences between Lenin and Trotsky become clear. Lenin wanted peace immediately while Trotsky wanted to wait. * Lenin realised that with the amount of desertions at the front, Russia wouldn't mount a serious challenge to Germany for much longer so a treaty would be a minor set back if Germany lost the war to Britain and France. ...read more.

Middle

* But it wasn't just that the Bolsheviks were communist. They had declared that they had no intention of paying back the debt owed by the old Tsarist regime. * But the truth was, the interventionists couldn't handle another war yet not just after the 4 year struggle with Germany. * However the foreign inventions were never a serious threat to the Bolsheviks, there attempted to cooperate with the Whites were half-hearted and had no effect anyway. * So the Bolsheviks used their withdrawal as propaganda, portraying themselves as the saviour of the nation from foreign conquest. The Effects of the Civil War * The Bolshevik victory in the civil war encouraged them to try and spread the revolution to Poland by marching the Red Army in hoping that Polish workers would rise up. * However it was seen as an invasion and the Bolsheviks were forced back. * This showed Lenin that the world wasn't ready for a world revolution. So he softened his foreign policy with the aim to avoid conflict with Europe but comintern would continue to call for the international revolution. * The civil war also shaped how the communist party would rule in years to come. As the communist party had learned how to rule during a war, it had made them more willing to use force to impose themselves. ...read more.

Conclusion

3. Freedom of assembly 4. Rights for trade unions and release of imprisoned trade unionists. 5. Ending of the right of Communists to be the only permitted socialist political party. 6. The release of left wing political prisoners 7. Ending of special food rations for Communist party members. 8. Freedom for individual to bring food from the country in the towns without confiscation 9. Withdrawal of political commissars from factories. 10. Ending of the Communist party monopoly of the Press. * The government's chief concern was the source of the demands as the workers and sailors of Kronstadt had supported the Bolsheviks. * The Bolshevik press tried to make the Kronstadt protestors seem like white agents but really they were loyal socialists who felt betrayed by Lenin's government. * Scared by their increasing demands and numbers, Trotsky ordered the red army to crush them. * When the last ultimatum was rejects by the protestors, 60,000 Red troops stormed Kronstadt. The workers/Sailor fought back savagely before they were overcome. * Leaders who escaped were hunted down and executed. Lenin justified this by saying the rising was the work of the bourgeois enemies of the October Revolution. * Lenin had learned something however when decided to lessen the rigours of War Communism in order to avoid another rising. * This was the prelude to the introduction of the NEP, designed to reduce famine and opposition to the party. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how the effects of the First World War caused the collapse of the ...

    4 star(s)

    He would not have left Russia to go to the war front and the problems would have been controlled. The Tsar would have stayed in power and, therefore, there would not have been a revolution to get the Bolsheviks power, as the Tsar would still rule and still have some support.

  2. How important was Lenin in the consolidation of Bolshevik rule by 1924?

    Protesters were fired upon by soldiers. With a Socialist coalition, the Bolsheviks wouldn't have had as much freedom and wouldn't have been able to consolidate their power, but it may have prevented the Civil War. As a result of the Civil War and War Communism, Russia was faced with economic collapse and widespread rebellion.

  1. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    Before he was appointed Commissar for War, the Russian Army was in disarray, little discipline was being implemented, capital punishment had been banned and the soldiers were choosing their own officers. As soon as he took control he issued strict orders to the army.

  2. How did the Bolsheviks retain power in the crisis years from October 1917 to ...

    The Tsar, the Mensheviks; who was going to lead Russia after the Bolsheviks? Who would decide? This meant that they didn't really want to win as much as the Bolsheviks did. During this Civil War, Lenin adopted a new economic policy, called War Communism.

  1. The Bolshevik Revolution In October-November 1917

    However the Red Guard now had rifles. This meant that Lenin could now seize control he persuaded the other Bolshevik leaders to make their bid for power in November 1917. Some Bolshevik leaders felt they were not ready like Zinviex and Kamenev which wanted it delayed.

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    In early 1918 they strongly opposed the treaty of Brest-Litovsk because they feared that its disarmament provisions might include the shutting of their plants, and might thereby cost them their jobs. These factories thus became a receptive target for Menshevik agitation, and remained strongly anti-Bolshevik.

  1. The Bolsheviks came to power in October 1917 mainly because of the effects of ...

    Less than 2 years after the war began the Russian railway system had virtually collapsed. The war played a major role in the radicalisation of the industrial workers and the peasants. The war had dangerous consequences for the government, severely pressurising their regime and greatly weakening their resilience.

  2. How significant was Lenin between the years 1902-1918 to the formation of the Bolshevik ...

    One can argue that the role of Trotsky was of greater significance to the formation to the BG. Despite Lenin being convinced since the beginning of September 1917 that the time was right for the Bolsheviks to seize power by force?25 the twelve member Bolshevik Central Committee thought his policy

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work