• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Bolshevik Revolution In October-November 1917

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Bolshevik Revolution In October-November 1917 1. Explain how Lenin's oratory, personality and leadership contributed to the Bolshevik Revolution of November 1917. 1. Lenin's oratory skills, personality and leadership shaped the Bolshevik message to the Russian people. His April Theses' main points formed the basis of the popular slogan 'peace, land, bread' which appealed to key groups e.g. Soldiers and workers. Lenin returned from exile in Switzerland after hearing about the march revolution (the abdication of the Tsar). He thought that the fall of the Tsar was the prelude to the collapse of the Russian armies, the German government arranged for Lenin to return to Russia in a sealed train across occupied Europe in the hope he would spread like a virus so that Russia would withdraw from the war. The Germans reasons were miltary. However, Lenins reasons were political. With Lenins return he changed the whole course of the revolution and on his arrival he made a speech demanding that 'there should be no co-operation with the Provisional government', 'the war (WW1) should be ended immediately', 'the land should be given to the peasants' and 'the Soviets should take power' (handout). The points in Lenin's speech were later written up as the 'April theses', in which Lenin argued that there should be a second revolution in which the Soviets should take power 'a Socialist revolution' (handout), this would involve the workers taking power. Many Bolsheviks leaders were surprised and some did not take him seriously. The Bolshevik party did turn his 'April theses' in to slogans 'Bread, Peace, Land' and 'All power to the Soviets' (handout). This was what the people wanted to hear. These slogans boosted popularity of the Bolshevik party. ...read more.

Middle

After the Tsar's abdication the Provisional Government came to power, inherited the long term unpopularity and problems from the Tsar. This Included the war which was their main source of unpopularity. Kerensky and other middle class people wanted to carry on the war which did not make the Provisional government popular. They believed Russia could win the war and that it was important to stand by its democratic allies, Britain and France. In July, Kerensky launched a major attack on the Germans to support his democratic allies, but this led to a terrible defeat. It sparked an enormous demonstration in Petrograd, which became known as the 'July days'. Soldiers and sailors poured in to the city as they decided to vote with their feet and workers poured onto the streets of Petrograd to complain about the long term shortages of food etc. They naturally turned to the Bolsheviks but at this time they were not ready to seize power. In the end the demonstrating turned into riots and troops were sent into break up the mobs. This was always a problem for the Provisional Government as the war always created difficulties for the Provisional Government. Therefore, it is a long term cause of the November revolution. The Provisional Government also granted political freedoms to Russian people (including allowing Lenin to return from exile). They believed freedoms would make them popular and freedoms were central to what the Provisional Liberals believed in. However people could now protest against the Provisional Government. Also, there was an appeal of Marxism which was at the Heart of Lenin's philosophies. This made it more difficult for the Provisional Government to get the ideas across for the future. ...read more.

Conclusion

"He is not one of the gentle folk, he is one of us, they would say"' (The times) increasing the Bolsheviks popularity. Lenin saw good talent in people and one of them was Trotsky. Even though Bolsheviks did not trust him as he used to be a Menshevik he played a major part in organising the Bolshevik take-over in October-November 1917. So with out Lenin the Bolsheviks would of never of come to power as Trotsky would of been discarded. The Bolsheviks would not of had the popularity he brought them or his determination to push though the take-over of the Provisional Government. Even tough it was luck that Lenin's Red Guard got rifles when Kronilov decided to challenge Kerensky and the war which was going bad for Kerensky. This primed Russia for the Bolshevik Revolution. Also with out the unpopularity of the Provisional Government the Bolsheviks would not of had the support of the key groups e.g. The workers and mainly the armed forces which meant Kerensky could not have an armed resistance against Lenin. It was Lenin though who got the support of the army with the policy of stopping the war with Germany 'Peace' (April Theses). All these things brought about Lenin's Bolshevik revolution. Which makes him the main reason for the Bolshevik Revolution. Lenin's main difference was that he pushed his party to apposed the support of the Provisional Government and with out Lenin the Bolshevik most probably would have adopted the Menshevik position in support of the Provisional Government. It would also be wrong to say that Lenin conducted in 1917 the takeover as a flawless exhibition of political manoeuvring. He miscalculated badly during the 'July days' so it was more luck, determination and the help of Trotsky which brought Lenin in to power in November 1917. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. The Russian Revolution of October 1917 was potentially the most politically formative event of ...

    Austria-Hungary and remained on good terms with Russia through the Reinsurance Treaty. When the new Kaiser came to power, he sacked the Chancellor, and with it, he threw away the legacy and the peace that was attached to him. For example, Kaiser Wilhelm II, in 1896, proclaimed "Nothing must henceforth

  2. why did revolution in russia break out in 1917

    The duma demanded its own recalled and Nicholas bowed under the pressure and allowed the duma to reassemble.

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    So too, it will be maintained, was the support of many of the individuals who joined forces with the Bolsheviks in 1917. The answer to the first question consists of an examination of each of the three broad groups of society (the soldiers and sailors, the urban working class and the peasantry)

  2. Russia 1905-1941 'Explain how the unpopularity of the Provisional Government contributed to the Bolshevik ...

    The First World War provided a foremost problem for the Provisional Government. It had little choice but to continue the war. The differing attitudes to the war became the first major disagreement between the Petrograd Soviet and the Provisional Government.

  1. After the second Revolution of October/November 1917, the Civil War took place (1918)-1921). Explain ...

    Soon three separate White armies were marching towards the Bolshevik controlled region. Generals Yudenich and Denikin marched to Petrograd and Moscow, while Admiral Kolchak marched on Moscow from central Southern Russia. The Whites were also supported for part of the war from foreign troops from the USA, Japan, France and Britain.

  2. How is the Bolshevik Revolution best explained: Lenin's success or Kerensky's failure?

    This shows that they were unable to cope under pressure and needed time to sort out these things. The Provisional Government didn't want to pull out of the war because they had taken lots of war loans from the Allies so if they pulled out of the war, they would

  1. Why did the Tsar lose power in 1917?

    This could be considered as being detrimental to his loss of power in 1917 because by putting himself in charge it made him responsible for all of Russia?s defeats, this meant that people could blame him directly for the disastrous results in war.

  2. The Bolsheviks were able to seize power in October 1917 mainly because of the ...

    Kerensky?s role in this affair damaged his standing with both the right and left. The army was left demoralised and confused with little sense of direction. On the left the Bolsheviks gained an upsurge in support, who had taken a lead in organising the workers against Kornilov, whilst support for

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work