• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Bolsheviks were able to seize power in October 1917 mainly because of the weakness of the Provisional Government. How far do you agree with this view?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Oliver Perretta The Bolsheviks were able to seize power in October 1917 mainly because of the weakness of the Provisional Government. How far do you agree with this view? In the long term, it can be said that the weakness of the Provisional government was one of the main reasons that allowed the Bolsheviks to seize power in October 1917, the fact that they were weak and unpopular meant that nobody was prepared to defend it when it was attacked. They gave no hope of change and had unpopular policies towards war; it can also be argued that the failure of Kerensky’s offensive, dealing with the land question and Kornilov’s attempted coup was crucial to its fate. However, as well as the weak government, the strengths of the Bolsheviks also contributed to their rise to power. The Bolsheviks were brilliantly organised, they had masterly executed the coup d’état and had skilfully aligned itself with the demands of the workers and peasants. The Bolsheviks also had good slogans such as ‘Peace, Bread, Land’ and ‘All Power to the Soviets’. Other parties claimed that they would never carry out their promises, but their arguments were too complicated for people to understand, so this gained support for the Bolsheviks. ...read more.

Middle

They also believed that by following the alliance with France and Britain would get them important financial support. The major problem that was crucial to the government?s fate was the failure of Kerensky?s offensive. In June, as War Minister, Kerensky launched a major offensive against Germans however it was unpopular and morale began to collapse. The Provisional Government set up ?death squads? to execute deserters. This made things worse, by October 1917; 2 million soldiers were deserting, going home, killing the landlords, and taking land. This decision to continue the war weakened the capacity of the Provisional government to consolidate its position and deal with other problems that it faced. It also showed the lack of concern that the Provisional government had for those suffering in hardship of war, rank and file soldiers, the industrial workers and the peasantry which helped the Bolsheviks gain support. As well as this Kerensky delayed the summoning of the Constituent assemble which lost them valuable support from the peasantry. It was clear that the provisional government were in no position to implement many of the reforms that the industrial workers and peasantry wanted such as the Land question, and as a result of this, it was seen that direct action was the only way forward. ...read more.

Conclusion

They only lasted for 8 months, and from the start the Provisional Government had lacked both support and authority and its attempts to pursue a moderate line were perhaps undermined by the lack of middle class in Russia, but it could have done more to gain support from the conservatives or even the moderate left. Instead it alienated both groups and as a result was left isolated. A crucial factor was perhaps the decision to continue the war as it stretched the strength of the government which were not in a strong position in the first place. This allowed the Bolsheviks to use their strengths and take advantage of the situation; they were well organised and had a strong leader who was financed by German money to pay for their campaigns. They had their own private army which gave them military power and with this they had built up an efficient party organisation with an effective propaganda machine which allowed them to gain support. Although there was a setback in support due to the failure of the ?July Days?, In August the Kornilov coup revived Bolshevik fortunes, whilst at the same time undermining the position of the other socialist groups. In result, due to the weakness of the Provisional government and strengths of the Bolsheviks, when Lenin moved to take over, the government could do nothing to stop him allowing the Bolsheviks to seize power. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Weakness of the Directory was the main reasons for Napoleons rise to Power. ...

    5 star(s)

    He was probably not first choice as Siey�s did not trust him, as he saw him, like Benjamin Constant did, as too self-centred, and after all, it was Siey�s and Ducos' coup, not Napoleons so he wouldn't have got credit for it, however Ducos did as his military record did not appear to suggest political ambition.

  2. How important was Lenin to the success of the October 1917 Revolution?

    Another example is Stalin's five-year plans where he was seen to be continuing with Lenin's plans for the industrialisation of Russia. Lenin had tried ideas such as the New Economic Policy and setting up the State Planning Commission (GOSPLAN) to guide economic development but it had not worked fast enough.

  1. Why did the Bolsheviks seize power in 1917?

    By the end of February the troops had joined the rioters and the Tsar had no choice but to abdicate. The Tsars regime was then replaced by a provisional government. In the period of February-October the provisional government had many complications that lowered their status among the Russian people, and

  2. Russia, 1905 - 1917, The Causes of Revolutionary Change. Using your knowledge of the ...

    This showed that Lenin was very astute, as he had had chances to try and win power before, but he did not opt for that option, but waited until circumstances to his liking, and took advantages of them, resulting in the Bolshevik party ruling Russian headed by himself.

  1. "Why were the Bolsheviks able to seize power in Oct/Nov of 1917

    More importantly, was the significance of the April Theses. The Provisional Government had failed to gain the support of the peasants - the 84% majority of Russia. To gain power, the Bolsheviks needed their support, and they got it by putting together this thesis.

  2. Lenin's leadership was the main reason why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power ...

    This left the Bolsheviks as the only party against the war which vastly boosted their popularity. The Bolsheviks made it appear that they would take power in the name of the Soviet, which fitted perfectly with the soldiers and workers demands allowing the Bolsheviks to infiltrate the army; which could have easily halted Trotsky?s plans in October.

  1. Why did the Tsar lose power in 1917?

    up a little bit of his power may have been what cost him his title. By 1916 the Tsar had lost many of his supporters, even the Duma had turned against him ?we have lost faith in the abilities of this government to achieve victory.

  2. How far was the Provisional Government of Russia doomed from the start?

    Liberals dominated the Provisional government but in the government there were two groups the Octobrists who were slightly right wing and the Kadets who were lead by Milyukov who were leaning right, then there was a break off from the kadets, the left-leaning Kadets.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work