• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Bombing of Hiroshima

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Bombing of Hiroshima To what extent do the sources support the interpretation that suggests that the use of nuclear weapons against Japan was wrong? Use the sources and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer. In the summer of 1945, the people of Japan were struck by a new horror. On 6th August 1945, an American fighter plane flew over the Japanese territory holding a devastating new weapon. Atomic bombs were dropped on to the city of Hiroshima. It exploded with a gigantic flash, 570 meters above the city. The heat was so intense that the people nearest to the explosion evaporated. Approximately 70,000 people were killed instantly. As always, there are two sides to every story. Many people argued that the actions of America was wrong, however the Americans believed what they did was right. There is a lot of evidence that can be used to support or disagree with America's action. The Americans believed that the Japanese would never surrender. If the atomic bombs weren't used, hundreds of thousands of American soldiers would die. ...read more.

Middle

Also, according to a campaign for Nuclear disarmament, the bomb cost $2000 million and it would have been difficult to justify not using it after such a vast financial investment. Most of the general public believed that the dropping of the bomb was wrong. According to Source C, the Americans basically used the A-Bomb due to the vast financial investment and to test it worked. Sources F and G also imply that the action was wrong, Britain who is Americas ally even thought that what they did was wrong and they used it just to test if it worked. Source G written by the Japanese felt that they would have surrendered and the use of the atomic bomb wasn't necessary. The use of atomic bombs was thought of as revenge for the way that the Japanese treated the prisoners of war. Some Americans believed that they deserved to be taught a lesson. The use of the bomb caused so much devastation leaving people homeless and alone. This shows us how devastating such weapons are. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Japanese surrendered on August 10th when their army was near a revolt. Many civilians would have revolted because they felt it was better to continue fighting than give up. In my opinion, I felt that the actions the Americans took were morally wrong. I don't think that the killing of thousands of innocent people could be justified, people were killed unlawfully. Nuclear weapons weren't needed because it caused even more death and destruction after it was dropped because of the radiation. I feel that the bomb was dropped mainly to convey America's power to the world and to attempt to deter Russia from taking advantage. Also, many of the Japanese people said that they were going to surrender before the Atom bomb was even dropped. I think the bomb was dropped in order to test if it worked and to use it in any way possible because it did cost a lot of money, and for the President of the United States to say that the bombing was 'the best day in history' makes me feel that he was just testing out the bombs and not using it to force the Japanese to surrender. ?? ?? ?? ?? Page 1 of 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Was The Dropping Of The Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified?

    The survivors of the bomb had to deal with radiation sickness, which was explained above. This is a Japanese eyewitness account of radiation sickness ' survivors began to notice in themselves a strange form of illness. It consisted of vomiting, loss of appetite, diarrhea with large amounts of blood, purple

  2. Why did President Truman Decide to Drop the Two Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima and ...

    Its status had been tarnished after the attack on Pearle Harbour and so dropping the bomb would show the world that they have the greatest military capabilities out of the world powers. They wanted to increase their world status to what it had been before the Japanese attack.

  1. An evaluation of the United States decision to use atomic bombs against Hiroshima and ...

    (as quoted in Alperovitz 1) One of the leading alternatives to the use of the bomb was an invasion of the Japanese homeland. The attack would be on Kyushu in November of 1945 and then if required an attack on the industrial centre of Japan, Honshu in March of 1946.

  2. American History.

    Oh no... *The Adams Administration* - Adams was still in the early Washington phase [i.e. Presidents should be above politics and not support any factions] and, as a result, he let others take the lead too often, which gave his administration a reputation for inconsistency.

  1. The Emergence of the A-Bomb

    This project foresaw the production of a viable A-bomb. During its production, the most complicated problem was extracting such enriched uranium, which was needed to maintain such a powerful chain reaction. Thus a huge laboratory was built in Oak Ridge, Tennessee that could produce the amounts of enriched uranium needed for the project.

  2. Was the Hiroshima Bomb Necessary?

    It all starts from the alliance system during the Second World War, it was a great factor of why United States dropped the bomb because if they were on the other side maybe they would have dropped it in Europe rather than Asia or maybe not dropped at all.

  1. In August 1945,atomic bombs were dropped on two Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Why ...

    damage to the Japanese, this was what Professor Fussell thought when he heard that the bomb was being dropped on the Japanese: "Immense delight in revenge ............ very excited" This was also thought to be what most of the other soldiers were feeling when they heard of the news.

  2. Evidence and Source Questions on Atomic raids on Hiroshima and Nagasaki 1945

    The leaflet, however, is very one sided and one must remember this when analysing it. It fails to mention some key aspects of the situation. For example, it fails to explain the other options America had before dropping the second bomb, such as a penetration of the country with troops, or even conventional bombing which had been effective in Tokyo.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work