• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Cold War [1945-1991]

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Cold War [1945-1991] Europe has had its fair share with wars and battles. However most of them were of two peculiar and stand out types of war. They were either Wars of Ideology: what other men and women were allowed to believe, or Wars of Succession, and the balance of power. The cold war for the first time combined both of these characteristics of the European modes of wars. The cold war was fought to determine the fate of Europe which was divided between two great superpowers of the European tradition, the market economy driven United States of America, and the Old Russian autocracy reborn as the Soviet Union through the ideology of communism. "The history of the cold war has been the history of the world since 1945"1. It wasn't a confrontation between two empires, it was, "a total war between economic and social systems, an industrial test to destruction"2. Nevertheless it was also a fight between two conflicting values. The West believes in the ideas of a market economy, free enterprise and a multi party democracy. These qualities were cherished as a necessity. The scenario in the East was quiet contrasting. While the west believed in free enterprise, market economy and democracy the East was driven, by a command economy and single part statism, a.k.a, Dictatorship. The obvious conflict in beliefs, ideas and values, and the stubborn nature of those who defended these ideas vehemently were the driving force behind the cold war. This paper will examine the events of the Cold War period [1945-1991], and attempt to prove, how the technology and the identity of the United States and the USSR were altered during a period of fear and distrust. ...read more.

Middle

Divisions grew between the nations from here on. The Soviet counterpart, The Warsaw pact, followed the formation of NATO. However the Warsaw pact was less significant due to the member nations were already part of Russia. The Korean was, was the second conflict. Mao Tse Dung came to power as the communist leader of China in 1949. He wanted to push the ideology of communism southward. Stalin agreed to support Mao. North Korea allied itself with China and in turn was supported by China and Russia, in its war against South Korea. America foreseeing the spread of communism supported the democratic South Korea. The war ended without any real victor. North Korea eventually withdrew from the South and the Americans returned home. The war was a fight for containment. The Americans didn't want to invade a communist country for fear of retaliation by the Soviets or the Chinese. The Americans want to show the defeat of communism wasn't portrayed with the Korean War. The third conflict came in Vietnam. The Vietnam War was an extension of the cold war. North Vietnam invaded the south and it remained a relatively small conflict. The United States involvement was due to its fight for containment of communism. It had grave implications for future American politicians, and had a vast political importance in the US when it broke out. For America this was a war that it could not give up, but the nation did not want to pursue it either. This conflict of interest made this war a failure. Communist North eventually conquered the democratic south putting an end to the war. ...read more.

Conclusion

Numerous conflicts, ideas and emotions were involved. It also became a global insurance against a catastrophe. The defeated Soviet Union crumbled into the component parts that the tsarists had assembled it from. The one question that remains till this day is whether the cold war could have been prevented. May believe that if Roosevelt had used his negotiating position at Yalta wisely, Russia would have been unable to form those puppet states and gain access to Europe. Had Russia not been a part of Europe's political struggle, its power, and interest in the rest of the world would have diminished after WWII. It was the iron curtain that brought Russia into the limelight. The proxy wars (Korea and Vietnam), the Cuban missile crisis and the satellites bought world wide acclaim and fear. The identities switched numerous times, some times for the best and sometimes for the worse. However, staying true to the saying "to the Victor go the spoils" the Americans won the cold war and their identity has been solidified as the Heroes. Russia at once regarded as the villains have the reputation as the losers and their identity is one of a country that was outclassed and became weak. The technological advancement that the countries went through is one that will hardly be rivaled. With the technological advancement came the identity of intelligence bestowed upon both nations, regardless of how they were seen during the proxy wars, the building of the iron wall or the arms race. The familiar dangers of the cold war have ended, however the unknown perils of its aftermath lie in wait. 1 Page # 1; The Cold War: A History 2 Page # 1; The Cold War: A History 3 Page # 16; The Cold War: A History. 4 Page # 162; The Cold War: A History 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    It was an "orgy of terror," one historian said. Diplomats saw high officials tapped on the shoulder in public places, removed from circulation, and then executed. Foreigners were subject to constant surveillance. It was as if, George Kennan noted, outsiders were representatives of "the devil, evil and dangerous, and to be shunned."

  2. The Cuban Missile Crisis and the blockade

    This was because it still involved action, in this case a blockade, unlike the diplomatic solution, which was all talk.xxi Some critics felt that it was too passive, and that Khrushchev could act at anytime during the blockade. This was countered by Kennedy however, as he believed that Russia would

  1. What part did Ronald Reagan play in bringing the Cold War to an end?

    successful policy of arms reduction until there was a like-minded leader in the Kremlin. However, once Gorbachev was in office Reagan wasted no time in establishing personal links with him and, 'just four days after Gorbachev came to power Reagan was making positive overtures.'17 Both leaders were also aware that,

  2. Why Was Germany At The Centre of Cold War Tensions 1945 - 1961

    This was important to Germany and in particular Berlin as they demonstrated to both them and the East that the US were not going to give up on Germany and that they would not let it fall to Communism.

  1. The Cold War was a big rivalry that developed after World War II.

    containment while the Russian objective was to expand their sphere of influence. Russia wanted to spread communism to other countries while the United States fought to prevent its spread. Each country believed they were right. Separation of Berlin, Germany The first real conflict of the Cold War started in the divided Berlin.

  2. How True is it to say that the period 1953-1962 saw a relaxation of ...

    meeting with Eisenhower and other Western leaders signalled a sharp reversal of Stalinist foreign policy, and it is important not to underestimate the value of communication, even if little is actually agreed. The conference also did much to boost Soviet conference, as Khrushchev considered Eisenhower a 'mediocre military leader and

  1. When and Why Did the Cold War Start? Was any Individual or Power the ...

    [Parrish, Scott & Narinsky, Mikhail. 'New Evidence on the Soviet Rejection of the Marshall Plan 1947: Two Reports' 1994] Whereas American Ambassador Walter Smith regarded the Soviet rejection of The Marshall Plan as: 'Nothing less than a declaration of war by the USSR on the immediate issue of the control of Europe' [Parrish, Scott & Narinsky, Mikhail.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    At first it encouraged its own Palestinian clients to compete in the process, facilitating the entrance of Sa'iqa, PFLP-GC, and Abu Musa's Fateh-Provisional Command into these areas. In camps under direct Syrian control, Nahr al-Barid and Baddawi in the north, and Wavell in the Bekaa, these groups quickly gained the upper hand.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work