• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The conclusion of the missile crisis was absolute proof that the USAs strategy of containment had failed. How valid is this assessment?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

“The conclusion of the missile crisis was absolute proof that the USA’s strategy of containment had failed.” How valid is this assessment? USA’s strategy of containment was put forward by President Truman in April 1947 as the Truman Doctrine and had the aim of limiting the spread of world communism. The military confrontation between the USA and the Soviet Union over nuclear missiles in Cuba, in October of 1962, is often cited as the closest the two rival powers came to all-out nuclear war although both sides drew back from a nuclear conflict. Both sides came out of the crisis as both winners and losers although I ultimately believe USA’s strategy of containment had failed to a large extent following the end of the Cuban Missile Crisis. The consequences of the Cuban missile crisis signaled the beginning of a period known as ‘détente’ as both nations considered the possibility of the dual existence of two opposing ideologies through peaceful means. ...read more.

Middle

Furthermore, in 1968, the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which was designed to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons to other countries, was also signed by USA and USSR, which, emphasizes the willingness of both nations to peacefully resolve their differences. These agreements were encouraged by the changes that occurred in public opinion as seen from the growth in support for groups campaigning for peace and nuclear disarmament in countries such as USA and West Germany. All these evidence shows that the containment policy was a failure as it highlights the efforts both nations put into maintaining a peaceful dual existence instead of containing communism like USA previously did. The failure of the containment policy is further exemplified through USA?s failure of abiding to the Monroe Doctrine of 1823, stating, ?Further efforts by European nations to colonize land or interfere with states in North or South America would be viewed as acts of aggression requiring U.S. ...read more.

Conclusion

Despite USA’s strategy of containment evidently failing, the immense pressure USA put on USSR could also be seen as a positive outcome as it shited and moved the bipolar world closer towards greater cooperation prior to the era of détente which was to follow. One can argue that this was containment in a way as it stalled soviet aggression through peaceful means. USA also led to a souring Sino-soviet relationship due to Khruschev’s failure of keeping the missiles in Cuba, which could have positively hindered the growth of communism. In conclusion, I believe following the Cuban Missile Crisis, both superpowers and the world saw a greater need for peaceful coexistence as they were on the brink of a very destructive nuclear war. Although it is dubious that they genuinely wanted it, attempts for a dual existence of opposing ideologies is evident and both superpowers felt that peaceful coexistence was necessary at that point of time, therefore, rendering the policy of containment an ultimate failure. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Assess the strategic strengths and weaknesses of America's 'containment of communism' policy since 1945.

    to be used for military purposes. At the same time Stewart Alsop, a journalist, reconfirmed the 'general mood' of the time when he declared how "we (USA) are losing Asia fast."11 The following passage is the symbolism he uses to represent his fear of communism in Asia: "...The head pin was China.

  2. The Sino-Soviet Split

    The CCP leader's approach at this time was perhaps best expressed in his statement at the 8th National Congress of the CCP, where he said, "The Soviet way can build socialism, but we can also have another way to do this."18 Initially very successful, the Great Leap Forward posed a significant threat to Soviet dominance in Eastern Europe.

  1. The Cuban Missile Crisis

    in the iron curtain,"5 and, at the same time, to break down the relationship between the United States and West Germany. The Soviets felt that if the Americans failed to intervene despite the West Berliners' cries for help, this would weaken Germany's confidence in their US allies, and make a

  2. The Cuban Missile Crisis was a turning point in USA and USSR relations. Assess.

    To Khrushchev, the easily intimidated and manipulated Kennedy was now to him a strong leader that would not back down to his 'tough talk' that so many failed to overcome. Kennedy now realised that the general conception of Khrushchev was false, and that really he was a great political player

  1. The Cuban Missile Crisis and the blockade

    My second section will address the air strike alternative in three paragraphs similar in fashion to my first section on the diplomatic option. In my third section I will deal with the blockade option in the same way I dealt with the other two alternatives.

  2. why did a crisis develop over cuba in 1962

    been a disagreement as they ran there countries in completely different ways. This could have been a reason why the crisis developed. This is because the superpowers would be in constant disagreement of ideas and rules. However other people say that the cold war started in 1945.

  1. Examine the main premises behind Eisenhower's concept of containment

    It was indeed a victory for not only Ike, Dulles and their administration7 but also for the concept of "brinksmanship" that would carry favour with Ike and his concept of containment for some years to come.8 In a recent interview with John Lewis Gaddis however he argues that Ike and

  2. Were People at the time (1962) correct in regarding President Kennedy as the person ...

    The threat he and his Communist party presented to his American neighbours would change the way the Americans dealt with their Cold War enemies. In the same way, Castro's Communists also gave Nikita Khrushchev and the Soviets an entrance into North and Central American affairs.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work