• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Cuban Missile Crisis

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Remembered as perhaps the most intense episode of the Cold War due to its nuclear threat, the Cuban Missile Crisis has been analyzed extensively by historians hoping to construct an accurate picture of its cause and development. The tight control exercised by both Soviet and American government agencies, however, has limited access to relevant documents, and thus inhibited any objective study of the crisis. Until only a few years ago, most of the world would have agreed with Arthur Schlesinger Jr.s' description of the event as a "brilliantly controlled"1 American victory- a paragon of US dedication, morale, and diplomatic skill. But as the National Security Archive has gradually opened access to key accounts, it has become apparent that what seemed so finely orchestrated was in fact wrought with "misinformation, miscalculation, and misjudgment."2 At the time, tensions were already running high due to the fierce military and psychological rivalry between superpowers, and problems within the Eastern and Western blocs themselves made it even easier to misinterpret political signals. Failures in intelligence and a general lack of central control further complicated the situation, fuelling the fires of mistrust that were already burning with the increased urgency that accompanies the prospect of nuclear war. From these revelations, we can conclude that initial assessments of the episode as a thirteen day affair are incorrect, that it was rather the result of long-term misunderstanding. And while deliberate deception did play a significant role in the development of the crisis, we must acknowledge that it was, for the most part, perpetuated by a combination of basic mistrust and political and military mishaps. ...read more.

Middle

By the end of 1959, Cuba had become a Russian client state, and a useful foothold for the Soviets in the western hemisphere. Despite the intense antagonism that existed between the Russians and the Americans, the US administration did not view the close relationship between Castro and Khrushchev with any real alarm. This was because they felt that while the Soviets wanted to undermine the American public image, they were not willing to take action that could precipitate nuclear war. Thus, Kennedy was reasonably sure that his warning to the Soviets not to deploy missiles in Cuba would be obeyed in the interests of the common goal of nuclear non-proliferation. It came as a shock, then, when U2 planes flying over Cuban territory showed that several missile sites were under construction. This greatly increased the American mistrust of the Soviets, and, as correspondence began to flow between Moscow and Washington, it became apparent that there was an inherent difference in the way that the two superpowers defined the Cuban problem. For instance, the Americans felt that they had a right to know what was happening in their part of the world, complaining that the Kremlin had given "repeated assurances of what (you were) not doing"7- in effect, that it had lied to them. The Soviets, on the other hand, asserted that they were "under no obligation to inform the U.S of any activities (they were) carrying on in a third country."8 This statement was probably only made to promote a sense of strength and independence, but it was, to the Americans, a sign that even the prospect of nuclear war could not deter the Soviets from their campaign of domination and expansion. ...read more.

Conclusion

protect their public image at home, and yet, at the same time, undermine the enemy's position; how to keep up in the arms race while avoiding nuclear war. These things, and may others ensured that any resolution of the crisis would have to offer a military quid pro quo which would diffuse the nuclear conflict without causing either superpower to lose face. The fact that Soviet and American officials still disagree about the details of the eventual agreement, however, shows that it was more the "(nuclear) restraint that was practiced and expected"17 that prevented the outbreak of war than any diplomatic feat. 1 Jonathan K. Reece "Revising the History of the Missile Crisis," pg. 34. 2 Robert McNamara as quoted in Jonathan K. Reece's "Revising the History of the Missile Crisis, pg. 34. 3 William R. Keych "The 20th Century World" pg. 304 4 William R. Keych "The 20th Century World" pg. 304 5 William R. Keych, op cit., pg. 316 6 William R. Keych, op cit. pg. 297 7 Letter from John F. Kennedy to N.S. Khrushchev of Nov. 6, 1962. 8 Soviet Ambassador Kusnetsov as quoted in letter from John F. Kennedy to N.S. Khrushchev of Nov. 6, 1962. 9 The President's Address, October 22,nd, 1962. 10 "Top Secret" document released to the US National Security Archives in January 1989. 11 Ibid. 12 Letter from John F. Kennedy to N.S. Khrushchev of Nov. 6, 1962 13 http://www.wilsoncenter.org/subsites/ccpdc/pubs/zart/Ch11.html 14 Eisenhower as quoted by Jonathan K. Reece, op cit. page 46. 15 http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/nsa/cuba_mis_cri/moment.html 16 Letter from John F. Kennedy, op cit. 17 http://wwww.wilsoncenter.org/subsites/ccpdc/pubs/zart/Ch.11.html ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Were contemporaries correct in regarding President Kennedy as the Saviour of The Western World ...

    This information provided is written by one of the only people who were constantly alongside Kennedy throughout the predicament and could see the pressures he was having to contend with. This is also primary evidence and is accurate as this was one of the closest men to the president.

  2. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    Not only did the Cold War define America's stance in the world, dictating foreign policy choices from Southeast Asia to Latin-America; it defined the contours of domestic politics as well. No group could secure legitimacy for its political ideas if they were critical of American foreign policy, sympathetic in any

  1. why did a crisis develop over cuba in 1962

    After the allies won world war two they met at Yalta and agreed to let the people of Europe be allowed free elections to decide their own governments (democracy). They also agreed that Germany would be split into 4 zones run by Britain, USA, France and Soviet Union.

  2. History of the United States

    In 1895 the United States intervened bluntly in the VENEZUELA BOUNDARY DISPUTE between Venezuela and imperial Britain, warning that, under the Monroe Doctrine, American force might be used if Venezuela were not treated equitably. A Cuban revolution against Spain, begun in 1895, finally led to the SPANISH-AMERICAN WAR (1898), undertaken to free Cuba.

  1. The Cuban Missile Crisis was the most serious U.S.-Soviet confrontation of the Cold War

    Days before the President addressed the nation all military forces were upgraded to the highest alert. For the first time in history, all American military aircraft was armed with nuclear weapons. U.S. military forces worldwide were placed on DEFCON 3, a high-alert status.

  2. How far was the Cuban missile crisis the most significant event in the ...

    According to historian Patricia Weitsman ?the treaty was providing a modicum of safety?[2]. This statement by Weitsman reinforced the idea that the treaty was a key turning point in international relations because Russia?s fears of isolation were reduced and relations between Germany and Russia were strengthened.

  1. In the context of the period 1905-2005, how far do you agree that Khrushchev ...

    Such tactics are similar to that of Witte and Stolypin; who both saw economic growth accompanied by social reform. We see here Khrushchev being the first (within communism), to create the basis for civil reformation; in order for it to accompany other reforms, which go hand-in-hand with overall prosperity.

  2. Free essay

    The Cold War did not become fully global until after the Cuban Missile Crisis ...

    Though we see near brink of war in 1954 However before 1962, events such as showed aspects of the cold war going global, with the US granting independence to the Philippines In Africa and the Soviet Union giving money and weapons to opposing sides in many civil wars (Angola, Somalia, Ethiopia)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work