• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Debate over African American troops in the Civil War.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Philip Roedig Dr. Powell US History 22 November 2011 African American Troops As war became inevitable in the United States during the mid-nineteenth century, much attention was drawn to the debate on whether or not African Americans were allowed to take up arms and help protect their country. The idea of blacks being used as troops was an idea that many had not thought about until the outbreak of war at Fort Sumter. This triggered many northern African Americans to want to volunteer for service in the Union Army. African Americans are humans under the constitution and should have every equality and right to fight in a war as any other human. They would be fighting for their own freedom which would make for a very strong army. African Americans saw this as their chance to become free men, whites thought this could have an extreme impact on society and the United States itself. Many Americans argued against the use of African American troops in the United States. In the North, some argued that Black troops would negatively affect the army. ...read more.

Middle

Northern freed slaves were persistent on trying to earn the right to fight that some even wrote letters to the president trying to change his mind. ?Men! Men! Send us Men! They scream, or the cause of the Union is gone; and yet these very officers, representing the people and the government, steadily and persistently refuse to receive the very class of men which have a deeper interest in the defeat and humiliation of the rebels, then all others.?(Fredrick Douglas, W&B, 252) These men would then be fighting to win their freedom which would make an extremely patriotic army, and also a good motivator to win the war. Americans in the South began to worry that if they did not let African Americans pick up arms and fight for their country, then United States enemies would use them against themselves. ?We must either employ the Negroes ourselves, or the enemy will employ them against us.?(Montgomery, W&B, 266) This was a huge concern to all. It started to become extremely obvious that if not armed for the United States defense, the African Americans would definitely be made to fight against them. ...read more.

Conclusion

the Confederate States, secure their independence, and preserve their institutions, the President be, and he is hereby, authorized to ask for and accept from the owners of slaves, the services of such number of able-bodied negro men as he may deem expedient, for and during the war, to perform military service in whatever capacity he may direct.?(Confederate Congress, W&B, 275) Though those in the North and the South agreed and disagreed on many topics regarding the use of African American troops, most agreed that using blacks in war would increase their army size by a good hundred thousand. Due to the Emancipation Proclamation slaves in states that the union had no control over were given the right to fight in war. It was not until the 13th Amendment that slavery was totally abolished. African Americans finally were given full citizenship with the pass of the 14th amendment. Freed slaves persevered in trying to persuade the President to pass the Proclamation which then caused a domino effect, which eventually led to all slaves? freedom. African Americans are humans and are now protected by these Amendments, which started with their determination to be able to fight for there freedom. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Political Causes of the Civil War

    'You' have no oath registered in heaven to destroy the Government, while I shall have the most solemn one to 'preserve, protect, and defend it.'" Lincoln was trying to convey to his Southern constituents that he had no intentions of provoking a war and that any such actions would have to be initiated by the Southern states themselves.

  2. History Notes on the American Civil War

    seized by the Union forces, cut the South in half * The Union victory at Vicksburg came the day AFTER the Union victory at Gettysburg * Political significance of the back-to-back military successes HUGE: Union control of the Mississippi quelled the "Butternut" region because now the Mississippi was open again

  1. History Notes on the aftermath of the American Civil War

    to give up this political advantage especially since, * Now slaves counted as a whole person vote and would make the South more politically powerful which worried the North b/c now the South could pass laws that favored them and once again the North cried, Who won the war?

  2. Causes of the American Civil War

    It was the general assumption that, due to the slavery standing of the surrounding states, that Kansas and Nebraska would become a slave state and a free state, respectively. This "Kansas-Nebraska scheme'; would be a downright revocation of the Missouri Compromise of 1820.

  1. What is the short term significance of the Emancipation Proclamation?

    It was a limited form of freedom for black American soldiers that the emancipation proclamation brought to them, a gradual progress of change. In the short term significance their experience can be arguably looked as a success as many black soldiers established freedom in knowledge showing them the real world

  2. What was the most important cause of the American war of independence?

    This was a tax levied on the paper required for legal transactions and on newspapers, it created a lot of problems, Firstly, the policy of limiting westward expansion that it was intended to help fund was not popular in the colonies.

  1. To what extent did the American Civil War succeed in removing the two main ...

    Nonetheless, revisionist historians have argued that slavery was not the main cause of the Civil War. This could possibly have been due to a new influx of evidence, or a particular historical debate. However, recently, historians have criticised these accounts for failing to appreciate the moral urgency of the slavery

  2. Research on the major Civil rights events between 1963 to 1968

    Changed people?s ideas Regardless of these protests from both sides of society, many historians now believe that the 1964 Act was of major importance to America?s political and social development. The act has been called Johnson?s greatest achievement. He constantly referred to the morality of what he was doing and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work