• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'The development of the international economy in the period 1945-91 favoured rich countries at the expense of the poor.' How far do you agree?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

2. 'The development of the international economy in the period 1945-91 favoured rich countries at the expense of the poor. How far do you agree? The international economy started developing rapidly after the period 1945-91 as part of the United States policy to gain a foothold against the Soviet, especially in the light of the cold war situation. Rich countries would refer to the developed nations while poor countries would refer to the less developed nations. In the question, however, it can be said that a third group, the communist bloc have been left out as they had little, if any, participation in the development of the international economy. The development of the international economy would then refer to the setting up of certain organizations as part of the Bretton Woods system. These include GATT, world bank and IMF. However, for simplicity sake, we shall look at specifically GATT and its workings to determine whether it favoured rich nations over the poor ones. The General Agreements on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) was founded in 1947 as a predecessor to the aborted International Trade Organisation (ITO) ...read more.

Middle

Yet developed countries reduced trade barriers with other developed countries but not with less developed countries. This was definitely a case of the rich being favoured through GATT polices at the expense of the poor. With reduced trade barriers, the developed countries could export more; increase economic growth while the poorer states plunged deeper in debt. The way GATT worked no doubt benefited the developed and richer countries. However to say that it was at the expense of the poor would be a bit too bias. In an open world economy, when one party gains, another loses. Often, the less benefits of a freer world trade received by the poorer countries were due not to the principles of GATT but the circumstances they were in, as they were undergoing the decolonisation process and were unable to ride on the success of other capitalist nations. GATT was seen as a rich man's club consisting of mostly developed countries, influential and powerful to protect their own interest. However, GATT did not really favour the rich at the expense of the poor. In fact, the less developed countries' points of view were taken into consideration in many instances epically seen through the negotiation rounds that GATT initiated. ...read more.

Conclusion

Naturally, GATT's actions were focused on helping the Western countries, which happened to the more developed and thus wealthier countries compared to the 2nd and 3rd world countries, recover economically so that they could withstand the communist threat posed by the Soviet Union. Despite GATT's commitment to free world trade, the interests of the USA, characterised by its policy of Containment especially after World War Two were the dominant factor behind the GATT's policies. This was evident in the way the USA sponsored free trade and gave aid through the Marshall Plan in 1947. In conclusion, GATT favoured the rich at the expense of the poor can only be agreed to a small extent. Indeed, the rich benefited from while GATT was in place than the poor but to say it was at the expense of the poor would be too extreme. With GATT inherently bias towards the US, it was the inability of the less developed countries to integrate into the world economic order that caused them to suffer. But, it is difficult to say that the poor lost out at the expense of the rich with developing countries experiencing 5 to 6% of economic growth at least in the first 25 years after World War Two. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Free essay

    The development of the international economy in the period 1945-2000 favoured rich countries at ...

    4 star(s)

    20 years of GATT indifference to special problems of the LDCs can be represented by the results of the Dillon and Tokyo rounds of 1960-63 and 1973-79 respectively. By the Dillon round, a mere 160 out of 4400 tariff concessions were export items of LDCs.

  2. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    The US embassy was attacked and hostages seized. In Nicaragua Communist guerrillas seized power. Cuba sent armed forces to Africa to help rebels in Angola. * On Christmas Day 1979, Soviet forces entered Afghanistan, arrested and executed the Prime Minister, and set up a pro-communist government.

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    It was time, Stalin said, to stop viewing Russia as "a passive third observer. ... It is impossible to tolerate such a situation any longer." In the end, Britain and the United States offered the token concession of giving the Soviets an innocuous role on the advisory commission dealing with

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    The bomb consisted of 300 kilograms of Hexogen reinforced by PETN this is equivalent to abourt 12,000 pounds of TNT. The explosives were mixed into a complex of gas and other substances. The difficult and delicate task of gas-enhancement requires the sort of specialized skills and wealth of experience possessed by a state, not an outlaw organization.

  1. American Society today is a rich, powerful and highly populated

    However from the end of the 1890's onwards the number of immigrants was increasing from southern and eastern Europe. John Higham argues that the hostility was increasing because the Americans were scared of these immigrants because "By Western European standards the masses of southern and eastern Europe were educationally deficient, socially backwards and bizarre in appearance."

  2. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    or non-English peoples with ancient reasons for hating the English (the Scots-Irish); or outsiders in a British-dominated society (Germans and Dutch); or slaveowners sharply conscious of the distaste with which they were regarded by the British at home. A divisive controversy racked the colonies in the mid-18th century concerning the privileges of the Church of England.

  1. History of the United States

    Secession Southern leaders had threatened to leave the Union if Lincoln won the election of 1860. Many South Carolinians, in particular, were convinced that Republican-sponsored emancipation would lead to bloody massacres as blacks sought vengeance against whites. In order to prevent this horror South Carolina seceded in December 1860, soon

  2. In the context of the period 1905-2005, how far do you agree that Khrushchev ...

    aspects of Russia are not reformed equally, disdain for a condition which is improved, is displaced onto another condition that is less developed: consequently leading to possible anarchy. These persistent long-term problems had to be assessed equally with other pivotal reforms, in order for the state to progress; this is apparent in the rule of Nicholas II.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work