• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The dissemination of democratic ideals, the propulsion of public information and the institution of free speech are in the eye

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Television media, war and truth An informed public is the cornerstone of modern society. An informed public during wartime leads to a healthy democracy. Though the media shares a special connection with wartime reporting, disseminating information of major news value, it often keeps the truth masked and reality covered. The media establishment profited by periods of rapid technological change through the 1970s and 80s, and as television reporting grew sophisticated, concepts of truth and reality were shaped by the immediacy of visual content. This essay, in light of the Vietnam War, the Persian Gulf War, and Iraq War, will outline how the impact of television coverage during wartime, political manoeuvring, and the atrophy of journalistic standards, has shaped our view of reality and truth. Television coverage of the Vietnam War, as the first televised war, reached audiences around the world. Conflicts of interest between journalistic integrity and nationalistic sentiments served to undermine the media's coverage of the war. The Washington Post announced on Aug. 5, 1964 "American Planes Hit North Vietnam After Second Attack on Our Destroyers; Move Taken to Halt New Aggression". Subsequently the New York Times reported "President Johnson has ordered retaliatory action against gunboats and 'certain supporting facilities in North Vietnam' after renewed attacks against American destroyers in the Gulf of Tonkin." Though there was no evidence of a "second attack" by North Vietnam, President Johnson in a speech delivered on Aug. ...read more.

Middle

The American Administration, evidence later indicated, utilized television images and newspaper reports to convince the public that Iraqi troops were threatening to invade oil rich Saudi Arabia. Though satellite images taken of Saudi Arabia's border detailed a small number of Iraqi troops, U.S newspapers, news magazines and television networks drummed up reportage in line with the Administration's political agenda. Independent press and peace activists argued against the deployment of U.S troops to the area campaigning for a UN peace-keeping force to be sent. But such sentiments did not percolate into the U.S media. Although television coverage saturated airwaves to summon public support for a U.S invasion of the Persian Gulf, television feeds of suffering Kurds, and other Iraqis, prompted large segments of the public against military solutions for conflicts in the Middle East. Mark Rozell Professor of public policy at George Mason University punctuated the impact of wartime television coverage by citing a Gallup Poll: A January 1991 Gallup Poll revealed that 89 percent of the American people identified television as their main source of information about the war; only 8 percent of the American people identified radio and 2 percent newspapers. The U.S led invasion of Iraq saw satellite internet and television, and further sophistication in television equipment, help the myriad U.S news agencies who invested their time in covering the war. ...read more.

Conclusion

The notion of absolute truth and reality of television coverage is undermined by the representations of Al Jazeera as both a "mouth piece of the zionists" and a "mouth piece of Osama Bin Laden"11. Al Jazeera cutting to commercials plays a 30-60 second montage of American war planes, American bombs exploding and American army tanks across the desert. These images have come under criticism from U.S Press Officers. Dichotomies of interest will remain affirms U.S military Press Officer Lt. Josh Rushing as long as Al Jazeera & U.S media continue to play to their respective audiences: When I watch Al Jazeera I can tell what they're showing and what they're not by choice. It's the same thing when I watch Fox at the other end of the spectrum. It benefits Al Jazeera to play to Arab nationalism Just like Fox plays to American patriotism. Because that's their demographic12. Incessantly rolling out television images the media oversimplifies the coverage of war. An informed media - covering factual stories free from political slant - is increasingly important in a growing democracy. The media coverage of the Vietnam War led to degradation in journalistic integrity; the Persian Gulf conflict deepened political ties between the American Administration and the media; Iraq War is covered by a multitude of U.S news agencies but also an Arabic television news channel. Though the wars were covered by the media in different lights the widening political influence and diminishment of journalistic cannons have been common threads that have shaped our understanding of truth and reality. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The role of foreign policy on democratic transitions in Armenia and Azerbaijan

    Consequently, the policies practiced by one state will undoubtedly affect another; this is especially true when examining the susceptibility of Armenia and Azerbaijan in comparision to their powerful neighbours. Moreover, this influnce extends beyond the political realm, affecting economic relations as well as social structures.

  2. Britain 1895-1918 June 2004

    Queen Victoria had been crowned Empress of India. Huge amounts of money were made from these colonies and Britain had a powerful military presence in all parts of the world. The Empire was seen as the status symbol of a country that was the most powerful in the world.

  1. Why did Iraq invade Kuwait?

    The allies were well south of the town to remain out of artillery range. Saddam Hussein's forces moved too fast for the allies to make a meaningful counter move. General Schwarzkopf said that the town would be retaken by the Saudi army with the support of the Qatari troops in the area.

  2. Analysis of Vietnam Renunciation Speech - Lyndon B. Johnson General: ...

    Lyndon Johnson refers to peace and states that the Asian are "willing to work...sacrifice...and die by the thousands for it" - the word it referring to peace. The paragraph ends with Lyndon Johnson pointing out that "peace will only come because America sent her sons to help ensure it".

  1. The Not So Free.

    away to watch the general look as if he is going to castrate Major Roberts. Even Major Roberts is beginning to get worried, his faced now as white as a sheet and holding his breath, thinking to himself "Is this the General Williams I know.

  2. 'Analysis of a speech' - Political Communication.

    Every one of the proposals I've talked about tonight he's called a risky scheme over and over again. It is the sum of his message, the politics of the roadblock, the philosophy of the stop sign." He's saying here: we are very brave.

  1. American Public Opinion During Vietnam.

    In the late sixties there was a huge movement among the young generation known as the hippie movement. The youth started to revolt against the ideals set by their parents in favour of a life of peace, love and copious amounts of marijuana, Timothy Leany who was a professor of

  2. American Public Opinion during Vietnam.

    The reality was that it all lasted for far too long. As the body bags mounted up the Americans started to question their involvement. Wounded soldiers and veterans came home with stories of how they were encouraged to kill anything that moved.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work