• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The economic consequences of the First World War on Italy were the most significant(TM). To what extent would you agree with this assessment of the effects of the First World War on Italy?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'The economic consequences of the First World War on Italy were the most significant'. To what extent would you agree with this assessment of the effects of the First World War on Italy? (22) There were many significant effects that the First World War had on Italy, which crippled her socially, politically and economically. Not only did the war bring a huge economic burden, but it stretched the political system to its limit and divided the nation. I am going to discuss these effects and come to a conclusion on which one was indeed the most significant consequence of the First World War. Economically the First World War was disastrous for Italy. The financial cost of keeping the soldiers armed and fed had placed a heavy burden on the Italian treasury. The war effort had consumed huge amounts of industrial goods, but no peace time economy could match this. Italy lacked raw materials, a large domestic market and an established trading system, all leading to post war recessions. As a result huge sums had been borrowed from Britain and the USA - the national debt had increased radically from sixteen billion lira in 1914 to eighty-five billion lira in 1919. However, these borrowings had proved inadequate to pay for the war and the government had resorted to printing money. ...read more.

Middle

During 1919 over a million workers took part in strikes and the membership of Socialist trade unions shot up from a quarter of a million in 1918 to two million in 1920. Finally, soldiers returning from the war were plunged into this deteriorating economic situation. The hoped-for prosperity was nowhere to be found. Industries whose profits were falling did not take on new workers. Unemployment was rising and broke the two million mark during 1919. To the soldiers this seemed a very poor reward for their sacrifices. As the economy worsened political divisions widened. The industrial workers flocked to the Socialist Party, whose membership rose from about 50,00 in 1914 to about 200,000 by 1919. The party had long abandoned the commitment to gradual reform that Giolitti had tried to encourage during the pre-war years. It now advocated revolution. Inspired by the Russian Revolution of 1917, socialists called for the overthrow of the liberal state. Many middle classes were terrified. In this state of fear, many conservative Italians were disgusted that the government appeared to be doing nothing to meet the threat. Instead of using the power of the state to crush strikes and to harass Socialists, the Liberal government of Francesco Nitti was urging industrialist to make concessions to workers. Shopkeepers had been alienated in June 1919, by what they sa3w as a government surrender to rioters who were protesting against the spiralling price of food. ...read more.

Conclusion

For such men, Liberalism and the parliamentary system had proved abject failures. A powerful, dynamic Italy would have to be achieved by other methods... In conclusion, at a first glance there is some strong evidence that would suggest that the economic crisis was not in fact the worst consequence of WWI. The war certainly divided the war politically and led to the Biennio Rosso. But, I feel these other consequences of the war were greatly magnified if not caused indirectly by the economic crisis itself. It was in fact the workers resentment towards longer hours, a fall in wages (due to inflation) and the ban on industrial action which brewed hatred towards the political system and led to the growth of Socialism. One may argue that if the economic situation had not been so bad that support for Socialism may not have grown so rapidly and in turn the Bienno Rosso may not have happened. The socialists would not have had enough support to prove a real threat and so their strikes (if there were any) would have been insignificant and their ideal of revolution may not have spread fear amongst the middle class and the rights anger towards the government's inability to control the perceived Socialist threat. Therefore, in conclusion, I do believe that the economic consequences of the First World War on Italy were the most significant. ?? ?? ?? ?? Tom Saunderson 13S AS History ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how the effects of the First World War caused the collapse of the ...

    4 star(s)

    the wartime government in the hands of the Tsarina, Alexandra, and Rasputin. This was a mistake, as the Russian population disliked both Alexandra and Rasputin. They didn't like the Tsarina because she was German and they thought she was a spy for the war.

  2. How far was the First World War responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs ...

    of the Romanov dynasty because it could be argues Rasputin only magnified the issues Russia was facing and could have not played a significant role in the downfall because his murder did not save the Romanov's. Short term casual issues drove people onto the streets in January and February 1917

  1. How far was the First World War the main cause of the fall of ...

    Firstly, there was the fact that Nicholas' personality restricted his outlook and his confidence, limiting his trust to only a few individuals, leaving Alexandria in charge while he felt it was imperious that he should go to the front line.

  2. The origins of the first world war

    He knew that to bring all the different societies to work as one German nation he needed a foreign triumph to unite the people into the second Reich.2 'The Prussian state under the support of the other main German states attacked a province of France called Alsace and Lorraine.

  1. Vietnam war

    of the North. * Backed by the United States, Diem's government refused to open consultation with the North Vietnamese concerning general elections. The South contended it did not have to honor the agreement as it was not a signatory, and the U.S. feared that the communists would win the election.

  2. The weakness of the liberal state in Italy in 1919 was mainly caused ...

    Inflation also destroyed any savings the poor had. While certain war-related industries experienced massive expansion during the war like Fiat and Pirelli, many industries collapsed after the war. This was due to the sudden drop in demand for products like weapons and machinery.

  1. The most important effects of the First World War on Italy between 1915 and ...

    Even the Pope criticised what he saw as ?useless slaughter? in the Italian war effort. The government?s incompetent conduct of the war reinforced the disillusionment many Italians felt towards the political system. Any semblance of credibility the liberal government had was ruined and this would lead to the eventual rise of fascism.

  2. "The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust" How valid is this assessment ...

    Anti-Semitism within Germany built up in stages; however it is doubtful that the stages were planned from the entrance of National Socialism. Although there is some sort of pragmatic footpath which leads up to the Holocaust.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work