• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The economic problems in Ireland were the same after the Great Famine as before In light of this comment, evaluate and assess the Irish economic situation prior to and after the Famine.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

?The economic problems in Ireland were the same after the Great Famine as before? [60] (1798-1882) The coming of the Great Famine irrevocably changed the majority of the aspects of the Irish economy. ?Economics? is however a broad term for developments in society encompassing political relations, finance and society as a whole, and it is important to distinguish and properly evaluate these differing transformations. Certain features of the Irish economy found themselves to improve after the Famine, and some deteriorated; change had certainly been predominant. Though one aspect of the Irish economy, that to some was the most fundamental component, and essentially determiner, of Irish economics and arguably an underlying ?evil? that all Ireland?s economic hardships swivelled around, failed to change. The continuation of the dominant landlord-tenant relationship in Ireland meant that, although the majority of economic issues in Ireland changed in some way, the major, inherent problem of the Irish economy remained. Many features of Irish politics and society can be evaluated in order to properly judge any change, or continuation, in economic problems. As alluded to in the introduction, the Irish land system played a big part in determining, and feeling the effects of, the economy. ...read more.

Middle

The Irish Land Acts of 1870 and 1881 brought about several changes: tenants were required to be evicted on a ?just? cause, compensation was made mandatory, and made it easier for a tenant to sell and buy land. This did help change the economy: trade was stimulated and over the years a 20% reduction in rent would be achieved. It is however key to put these changes into context- although the tenants had been put in a stronger position in their relationship with the landlords; it served as no real cure for the economic ills of Ireland. It did not impact at all on Irish economic growth due to the fact that, the source of the problem hadn?t been the tenant-landlord relationship, but the shortage of cultivable land. Perhaps what best epitomises the lack of significant change and continuation of the domination of the landlord post-Famine is the fact that in 1879 1000 families were turned off their land. It is, after all, unlikely that the clamour of the tenant right movement, and then the land league would have arisen had the landlord-tenant relationship changed in any way. ...read more.

Conclusion

All points taken into account, it is undeniable that the Irish economy had changed in some degree after the Great Famine (some aspects for better and some for worse), the real question is to what extent this change was significant. The individual fortune of Irish farmers, and Ireland on the whole, did increase owing to the fall in population- the incomes of farmers increased and industrial development in Ireland allowed for improvements in education and trade. However there are certain restraints to these ?changes?- for instance, agriculture continued to preside over industry, and a serious shortage of cultivable land remained. However the fundamental cause of economic problems in Ireland- land tenure and the relationship between landlords and tenants- failed to see any real transformation. This can best be epitomised by the occurrence of the agricultural depression of the 1870?s, and exploring its causes. It is perhaps the report of the Royal Devon Commission that best summates the Irish situation in the nineteenth century- ?the source of all Ireland?s misfortunes and poverty was the fatal system of land tenure existing in the country?. Ireland?s failure to prevent the continuation of the landlords? dominance over the tenants meant that the inherent component of Irish economic problems, or crucially causer of these Irish misfortunes, would remain. Thomas Smith ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent was Hitlers rise to power due to Economic Problems?

    It is very likely that Hitler's condemnation of the communists meant that many Nazi voters were middle-class people who had more to lose from communism. Hitler's path to absolute power involved totalitarian capture of democratic institutions from within, explicitly with the assistance of the power of the state.

  2. Impact of The Great Famine on Irelands Society, Economy and Politics

    People were reluctant to have large families and in some areas a culture emerged that refrained from having sex as a means of controlling the size of their family- this was because of poverty - the famine proved that a big family was a burden at a time when resources were stretched.

  1. How effectively did Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years ...

    O'Connell's attempts to gain Catholic Emancipation with the Catholic Association was successful, however this was short lived as the franchise was raised from a 40 shilling freehold to a �10 household suffrage. O'Connell accepted this and began trying to gain Irish Reforms.

  2. HOW DID WORLD WAR ONE CONTRIBUTE TO THE TRANSFORMATION OF IRISH POLITICS 1914-1918?

    The formation and growth of both organisations would deeply influence the future of Irish and British politics. The prospect of Civil War in Ireland was a real possibility; Michael Laffan notes that "Carson was fortunate that the European crisis distracted attention from Ulster."5 Another way in which the war impacted

  1. How Effectively Did Irish Catholic and Nationalist Leaders Advance Their Cause 1801-1921 ?

    This led to a decline in Redmond's influence which Sinn Fein later benefited from. Furthermore Lloyd George's political skill was an unfavourable factor for the Irish nationalist leaders. For instance Lloyd George successfully managed to get both the Irish nationalists and unionists to agree his proposed Anglo- Irish Treaty by

  2. How effectively did Irish Catholic and Nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years ...

    It is clear that the Fenians had not been effective at this point; their failure with the revolution in Dublin was down to poor organization and British spies infiltrating their ranks. In 1867 the Fenians acted again, attempting to free one of their imprisoned leaders, Captain Kelly.

  1. To what extent were economic considerations the main motive for Portuguese exploration and empire ...

    discovery as a way of getting one-up on all this trade rivals and to become a strong economic power in Europe. The Economic considerations are both a Push and Pull factor because not only did the need for resources like gold, land and a new spice root push them towards

  2. 1798 Irish Rebellion notes

    In some minds, republicanism could easily be combined with the virtues of exclusionist Protestantism, and the French Revolution could itself be celebrated as a victory against the infidel Catholic Church. 1. The subject of the transformation of the United Irishmen from a constitutional to a revolutionary society is a fascinating but complex one.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work