• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The emergence of the Superpowers 1945-1962

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Unit 1: The emergence of the Superpowers 1945-1962 The Beginning of the Cold War: o How and why did the Grand Alliance collapse? The Grand Alliance was established in 1941 when Germany entered Russia and Japan bombed Pearl Harbour. The Grand Alliance collapsed due to many different reasons. The root of the problem was the clash in ideologies of the Superpowers. Communism Vs Democracy! Yalta saw cracks appearing, issues over elections and what to do with/about Poland. Potsdam saw an era of suspicion and mistrust, there was the division of Germany which in affect created the birth of the Cold War. Also in Potsdam there was denavification, democratization, deindustrialisation and demilitarization. Truman delayed conference because he wanted to test the atomic bomb. There were strains within the GA, e.g. they weren't supplying tanks and planes and the timing of the second front was a big strain. Overall there was a clash in ideologies and with Stalin's Russian sphere of communism relationships began to fall apart and along with this went the GA. o What was the German Problem? The German problem was basically the fight over Germany about who was going to take over Germany and how they were going to deal with the damage she had made to the rest of the world. The West took half of Germany and the East took the other half, the capital, Berlin was also divided into two. ...read more.

Middle

Disagreement over Greece - civil war between monarchists and Greek communists. International relations would be founded upon the division of each side being suspicious of the other. Marshall Plan would help the USA's economic problem along with reinforcing Truman's idea of containment. American vision was for there to be a stable European market. The Soviets saw the Marshall Plan as a clear example of American economic imperialism. Soviets also thought that their influence made override into the Soviet sphere of influence. Began an acceleration in the division of Europe. July 1947 the USSR walked out of the Paris Conference and the tripartite and established cominform, this was the Soviet response to the Marshall Plan. o Why did the USSR blockade Berlin (June 48 - May 49)? What were the consequences? An economic issue that was the immediate cause of one of the most dangerous crisis'' in Europe since the war ended. The West had created their own currency in their zone of occupation and on the 23rd June they introduced the Deutschmark into West Berlin, by 24th June 48 all road and rail links from the West zones to West Berlin had been blocked by the Soviet Union. British Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin argued that the Soviet Union's aim was to make Germany all Communist. If the West retreated from Berlin then it would be a success to the Soviets and a step towards communist control over Germany. ...read more.

Conclusion

If they refused to do this then the East would effectively control all access to West Berlin and access would be determined by the DDR. Western powers ignored the Soviet threats, a summit on Berlin was proposed. Khrushchev visited the USA and he and Eisenhower had talks about disarmament and the issue over Berlin. The Berlin wall was built in 1961, with only four main crossing points which were monitored by guards. The wall was a failure by Khrushchev, and a propaganda disaster. Designed to keep East German citizens trapped in a communist state. o How did the atomic bomb affect relations between the superpowers between 1949 and 1962? The USSR was reacting in a predictable fashion; in response to any technological breakthrough by one side there was an urgency to create some degree of balance. If the USA had nuclear weapons then so must the USSR, simple and logical start to nuclear arms race! It was a race to stay on top! August 1949 USSR carried out first tests on its own atomic bomb. Both sides had identical weapons of mass destruction and they both knew the potential scale of destruction that could be caused. NSC-68. The USSR would not hesitate to use nuclear weapons if it was to her advantage. If war between them was deemed to be imminent then the USA was to carry out a pre-emptive strike against USSR. USA must devise anti-nuclear defence systems and nuclear strategic planning would be based on an assessment of the danger. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    Truman sensed that only if the issues were posed as directly related to the nation's fundamental moral concern-not just self-interest- would there be a possibility of winning political support. Hence, as Truman defined the question, the world had to choose "between alternative ways of life."

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    The Soviet Union was not prepared to do this. * In 1979 SALT II was signed by Carter and Brezhnev, but before it could be ratified relations between East and West broke down. The real crisis in Superpower relations, however, came in 1979.

  1. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    Why did the superpowers become involved in Korea? The superpowers couldn't agree on the future of Korea * In 1945 Korea was occupied by Soviet and American troops after the defeat of Japan, rather like Germany: the Soviets held the land north of 38th Parallel; the Americans occupied south Korea

  2. Assess the strategic strengths and weaknesses of America's 'containment of communism' policy since 1945.

    which are to be examined are; the Marshall Plan and the Korean War. The aims of the Marshall Plan were complex and inter- dependent. Europe, by the end of World War II, was economically and politically shattered. As well as the great humanitarian need to aid Europe, the communist parties

  1. The Sino-Soviet Split

    worry for Khrushchev, and caused the competition between the two parties to escalate once more. While now on an equal footing with the Soviets in most facets of communist bloc administration, Mao was surpassed in one arena: Khrushchev clearly took the lead in the question of economic competition with the West.

  2. The Marshall Plan.

    the likely effects that would have on the eastern Mediterranean, and the possibility that the Soviet Union or its surrogates would fill the power vacuum there. Even before the disastrous blizzard of December 1946 to January 1947 had pushed Britain to the edge economically, the U.S.

  1. To what extent was the development of the post-Stalinist thaw in superpower relations between ...

    Beria took the initiative and offered the West a proposal of reunified neutral Germany. This alarmed East Germany as it look as if the USSR was about to abandon the East German government to capitalism. Ulbright (East German President) had already started a programme of Soviet-style industrialization which involved longer working hours and higher prices.

  2. In the context of the period 1905-2005, how far do you agree that Khrushchev ...

    Between 1954-55 approximately 11,000 enterprises moved from central to independent control, May 1955 major planning and financial decisions were removed from state Moscow control, to republican hold: Russia had become decentralised.[14] Proportions of industry were also subject to the effects of decentralisation; with Moscow-based ministries replaced with sovnarkhozy: independent organisations, free to regulate industrial activity within their provenance.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work