• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The events in India in 1856/7 were caused by the issue of the new cartridges to the Sepoys in the Bengal army How far do you agree with this interpretation of the Indian mutiny?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

?The events in India in 1856/7 were caused by the issue of the new cartridges to the Sepoys in the Bengal army? How far do you agree with this interpretation of the Indian mutiny? The Indian mutiny of 1857 was a watershed event in the history of British India, during the period of the 100 year rule it was the largest and most substantial threat to the British rule and was the ultimately the end for the rule of the East India Company in India. After which the British Raj were to take over as the ruling body in India with the Queen as their sovereign. The treatment of the Sepoys in the Bengal army, the arrogance shown by the British towards the Indian culture and practises, the proposed idea of forced westernisation and the liberal reforms which the East India Company introduced on the Indian people were all major factors as to why on the 10th May 1857 Sepoys disobeyed orders from their British superiors in Meerut and then turned on their superiors and murdered all of the British soldiers who surrounded. These reasons alone were building huge amounts of tension between the Indian people and the British rule however the spark with ignited the mutiny was the issue over the new cartridges for the rifles used by the Sepoys in the Bengal army, it was rumoured that the casing for the cartridges was sealed with cow and pig fat which would go against beliefs in Muslim and Hindu ideologies. ...read more.

Middle

argue was the main factor as to why the mutiny occurred as it was such an insult to the way the Indian people run their society. ?Dalhousie?s unbridled policy of territorial annexations was bound to alienate local rulers and their followers. As a climax to a series of annexations Dalhousie brought the ancient province of Avadh under the company rule in 1856? Judd: The Great Indian uprising of 1857-8. This alongside with other annexations was one of the final straws in the aggravation of the Indian people. It allowed any princely state whom did not have a male heir to be taken over control by the East India Company. ?A formula which allowed the East India Company to extend its control into Indian territory when a native ruler died without what the Company considered a legitimate heir. Indian tradition held that adopted children had the same inheritance rights as birth children. But the company did not recognize their heirs. In Oudh, the application of the Doctrine was considered a final outrage of British conquest.? Joseph Coohill: History Today, the Indian rebellion. Due to the historical and cultural importance of Oudh in Indian society it was considered a huge cultural insult and one which the Indians would not stand for, all of these factors were huge contributors to why the Indian mutiny occurred in 1857. ...read more.

Conclusion

To conclude it was not the cartridge issue which was the main factor as to why the Indian mutiny occurred in 1857, it was a catalyst, an issue which was the final straw to a lot of inconsiderate cultural and political changes to the Indian society which the British rule believed they could get away with and it caught up with them in 1857 when did rose up and fought back against their imperialist rulers. Bandyopadhyay does make the argument that the cartridges were a vital issue as to why the mutiny occurred however Judd, Coohill and Brendon all see similar views in that it was the liberal reforms within both personal life and the changes to the way the Sepoys were treated was the main cause for the mutiny, in particular the Doctrine of Lapse as it interfered with all parts of the Indian way of life and gave the impression that they wanted dominated of the country and full control of the states within. It could be argued that if the cartridge issue had not had happened then the mutiny would have happened later on or not even happened at all, it was the final straw for the people in India, alongside their view of a change every 100 years they knew something had to be done, and in a lot of people?s minds this was it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. What was the impact of the Norman Conquest

    The amount would depend on the victim's social status, so a nobleman would receive more than a mere labourer. In the case of murder, it was also called the 'murdrum fine' and this was created by the Anglo-Saxons and still used by the Normans.

  2. Strategy in Cortes' conquest of Mexico

    which slowed their escape and increased the likelihood that they would drown if they fell or the Aztecs forced them into the water.25 The losses on the Night of Sorrows only served to reify Cort�s' resolve to re-take Tenochtitlan. He wrote his emperor that "it was my firm resolution to return and avenge ourselves on the inhabitants of the capital."

  1. The Indian Mutiny

    Prior to the EIC, in India The Mogul Empire was the dominant political organisation and has been maintaining its stability and strength. However, as a result of the British presence in India, the Mughal empire had disintegrated and was being replaced by a variety of regional states.

  2. Cities were the main driving force of the Reformation in Germany(TM) " explain whether ...

    Yet Luther revoked this offer in 1521, as he sustained a strictly pacifist approach to reform at this time. Luther felt that there was little to be gained by violent methods at this stage of the Reformation and already had the influential support of Frederick the Wise.

  1. Gandhi was instrumental in India achieving its independence. Gandhi was able to procure Indias ...

    Often the poor were not utilized, they were thought to be insignificant. By developing a connection with the poor Gandhi had 80% more people on his side to help him fight the British. Upon returning to India from South Africa Gandhi traveled all over India for two years in order to connect with the people of India.

  2. The cult of Stalin and the purges of the 1930(TM)s were two aspects of ...

    As a result it is likely that a large number of accusations had been invented by the NKVD to fulfil the quota and that many of those arrested had not actually committed any crimes against the State. Among those arrested, 28% were to be shot and the remainder would be forced into Gulags.

  1. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    the Indians, as ?many were gleefully or casually tortured and defiled with pork and beef.?[6] Thousands of civilians were killed, inciting a bitter resentment in the Indian people which fuelled their desire for independence, existing long before Gandhi emerged. The sepoy uprising of 1857 was confined to Northern India, but paralleled with civilian unrest on a wider scale.

  2. Stresemann controlling inflation was the main reason behind success of the Weimar Republic in ...

    This was very good for the Weimar Republic as people would have been much more supportive towards them as more people were able to get jobs and the economy was on the rise. As the country had just suffered hyperinflation they would have been very appreciative of these positive changes.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work