• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

The evidence of the deplorable behavior of the United States and its practices and policies of foreign relations exposing the United States executive branch's inherent attitude of disregard toward human rights.

Extracts from this document...


Part I - Introductory Overview The writing presented here is first, a summary, and next an evaluation of a chapter from a scholarly text that assesses the evidence of the deplorable behavior of the United States and its practices and policies of foreign relations exposing the United States executive branch's inherent attitude of disregard toward human rights. As an instrument toward this assessment, the intensely investigated event of Chile's government overthrow on September 11, 1973 is presented as a case study in extensive detail. The author states that, as to clarify the true track record of the United States and its actual concerns regarding human rights abroad, this "chapter will examine [the United State's] respect for procedural and normative restraints against arbitrary governmental interference in people's lives [abroad] and in the exercise of their rightful decision-making authority" (196). Summarily, this writing is a revelation of the genuine "hostility to human rights" of primarily the executive branch of the United States government where its actual concerns, conflicting with "professed values" and with behavior of "staggering immorality," are mainly that of the interests of U.S. lead multinational corporations. Initially, the text addresses recent increasing awareness of a long history of human rights abuses by the United States discrediting a generally perceived idea of "an [unusually high] degree to which human rights are practiced within [American] society and honored in [the United States] external relations with other countries" (196). Additionally, defined are ideal aspects of human rights including its principle dimensions of "self-determination" of a nation and of "nonintervention by one state in another state's domestic affairs" (197). ...read more.


This set the stage for the September 11, 1973, U.S. urged and supported, Chilean military coup d'tate deposing President Allende along with his democratic government. In consideration of the above, the text then addresses blatant U.S. public rhetoric as false "professed values" and refutes each by the examining the explicit behavior of the United States and U.S. lead multinational corporations to reveal actual "implicit values." Paramount is the ironic, conflicting value that the U.S. justified intervention in the Allende government to protect democracy; as per a televised statement by President Gerald Ford asserting that concern "is in the best interest for the people in Chile." This statement is contrary of the actual secretly planned undertakings and overall behavior of the United States executive branch resulting in deposing a democratic leader with a ruthless military dictator. Finally, various, more favorable outcomes of the Chilean case are explored within the Global Humanist approach, which the author acknowledges the futility of such speculation. Ultimately, the realization is that there are stark contrasts that "separate the picture of the world painted by U.S. officials from the picture envisaged by advocates of global humanism" (278). Part III - Contemplative Evaluation In all cases, there are two sides to a story where the truth lies somewhere in the middle. Many times, a concrete conclusion is not per objective review of the evidence presented and, the evidence may be slanted. Additionally, many facts may be obscured forever making an appraisal of one's actions nearly impossible and possibly unfair and unjust altogether. ...read more.


It is mind-boggling and disheartening. With the events of recent regarding the current White House and global capitalistic trends of the corporate world, I find it difficult to find disagreement with the text as presented as I see several parallels with the Chilean case. Namely, this would be the White House and corporate America taking advantage of idealistic values and using them for profit and gain. An example would be the publicly expressed concerns for the Iraqi people living under a repressive regime, a human rights platform, where obviously this is not the actual agenda. In Chile, a publicly expressed concern was that of the national security of the United States as well as that of the Chilean people when actually it was the private financial interests of a couple multinational corporations; there was never any threat to national security under the Allende government. Part IV - Conclusion I feel that it is shameful of the United States White House involvement in Chile. I value the perspective of a well-detailed report such as the one discussed. Further, with its analysis of the collected information, the text here discussed provides for provoking personal appraisal of current events. I recommend that all Americans study and contemplate the Chilean case as it may help provide for a clearer perspective of the present political-economic climate as well as provide for an awareness in recognizing similar conduct in that one may better be inclined toward appropriate action such as constructive discussion with those not so inclined to recognize similar destructive, indifferent behavior by their government. At the very least, a sound and informed dialogue by respect and result of such awareness may possibly increase the numbers of a more emphatic, knowledgeable voter. 1 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain why the United States withdrew its forces from Vietnam in 1973

    and Allied troops fought the North Vietnamese in a war of attrition marked by battles in such places as the Ia Dang Valley, Dak To, Loc Ninh, and Khe Sanh-all victories for the non-Communist forces. During his 1967-68 campaign, the North Vietnamese strategist, General Vo Nguyen Giap, launched the famous

  2. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    America's previous policy of generosity toward the Soviets had been "misinterpreted in Moscow," Harriman believed, leading the Russians to think they had carte blanche to proceed as they wished. In Harriman's view, the Soviets were engaged in a "barbarian invasion of Europe."

  1. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    photo-electric beams, remote-controlled weapons and guard towers, separated the countries of Eastern Europe from the non-Communist West. Yugoslavia was communist, but its leader, Tito, remained independent of Moscow. Stalin argued that he was justified in controlling Eastern Europe, since he needed protection - a buffer zone - against possible German aggression in the future.

  2. The Cuban Missile Crisis and the blockade

    anything, which simply couldn't happen.xliv Another reason the diplomatic solution wasn't chosen, was that at the time, the cold war had been going on for more than 15 years, and the American people were getting tired of nothing happening, they wanted Russian blood, as was evident after the Red scares

  1. The foreign policy of the United States in the Middle East.

    (Source: www.representativepress.org) America thus ultimately supported a regime, which in its own declarations believed that the Arab nation is an indivisible political and economic unit and that no Arab country can live apart from the others. This proved to be totally contradictory to America's own foreign policy and interest in the region.

  2. Free essay

    Do you consider military intervention in Africa as successful? Focus on the policies in ...

    brought one of the most war-shattered countries in Africa peace, is a remarkable success. In that success, equally, the UN, and especially ONUMOZ, has had a central role, (Clapham, 1999, p9). However, strangely, that place did not include any major role in the negotiation of the General Peace Agreement (GPA)

  1. The Cuban Missile Crisis

    When ten years passed with little tangible aid, but plenty of American interference in the political system, the civilians grew dissatisfied, a sentiment which intensified as the US threatened leftist Colonel Arbenz of Guatemala with military opposition if he did not step down as premier.

  2. The Hollywood Ten - House Un-American Activities Committee.

    Video/C 999:765 * Bulldog Drummond's Peril (1938) * Prison Farm (1938) * Emergency Squad (1939) * Golden Gloves (1939) * Television Spy (1939) * Her First Romance (1940) * Mystery Sea Raider (1940) * The Blonde form Singapore (1941) * The Devil Commands (1941)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work