• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The extent to which Germany was responsible for world war one

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was Germany responsible for the worsening relationship with Britain? Weltpolitik could be responsible for the deterioration of the Anglo-German relationship in the lead up to World War One. This is partly because of the policy of Flottenpolitik and the 'risk theory' focus of the policy. Britain felt their naval supremacy was threatened by the German naval expansion however it was never Germany's intention to have a navy the same size or larger than Britain; they wanted one 2/3rds of the size which shouldn't have threatened Britain or their supremacy. A lot of the threat that Britain saw coming from Flottenpolitik was misconceived and was never really a threat although it is understandable as to why they saw it as a threat because the Navy was Britain's main defence system and they weren't prepared to see it threatened. The decrease in relations caused by Flottenpolitik and the misconceived threat was not fully Germany's fault, nor was it Britain's. ...read more.

Middle

These two alliances combined with the Entente that Britain signed with Russia left Germany feeling encircled and isolated and subsequently threatened. Britain never felt threatened by the triple alliance however by forming their own alliances Germany were left feeling threatened although Britain never intended this. The alliances did lead to an increase in tension but neither side intended this and it wasn't Germany's fault anymore than it was Britain's fault. I don't think the alliance systems were a huge part in the deterioration of relations though and only when combined with other factors such as the Krugar telegram did they become much more relevant and threatening. The Krugar telegram was one incident that was Germany's responsibility and led to deterioration in relations as they were congratulating the Boer people who the British had fought against and therefore seemed to be creating tension between themselves and Britain. To deliberately congratulate Britain's opposition could quite rightly be perceived as being threatening and decrease relations between the pair. ...read more.

Conclusion

Following the rapid deterioration in relations the negotiations held to settle them also failed with Britain refusing to promise neutrality in the event of an attack on France or Russia and Germany refusing to consider limiting the size of the fleet. As neither side were prepared to back down the relations worsened further. The fact that neither side were prepared to back down suggests that it was equally their responsibility, not mainly Germany's. The fail in negotiations highlight how poor relations were and lack of trust between the two countries. By reaching this stalemate in negotiations paired with the mainly misconceived threat both sides saw the relations had deteriorated to a low point and this cannot be solely blamed on Germany, things were likely to go round in circles as neither side wanted to change until they felt the threat weaken but for that to happen one of the sides needed to make the first step. It largely wasn't down to Germany that relations worsened it was a combination of both sides and them both reacting against incidents that weren't even aimed at them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Hitlers Germany

    Through technical devices like the radio and the loud-speaker, eighty million people were deprived of independent thought. It was thereby possible to subject them to the will of one man.... Earlier dictators needed highly qualified assistants, even at the lowest level, men who could think and act independently.

  2. HOW DID WORLD WAR ONE CONTRIBUTE TO THE TRANSFORMATION OF IRISH POLITICS 1914-1918?

    the Southerners flank with Redmond in the hope of preserving a better deal for themselves with the inevitability of Home Rule. J J Lee notes "the main contribution of the convention was to show that Southern Unionists were now seeking to accommodate themselves to the likelihood of a Southern State"22

  1. To What Extent did Commandos contribute to final victory in World War Two

    However even though Commandos were utilised (successfully carrying out their missions), the bulk of the assault was led by Canadian forces. The aim of this operation was, however, different in that it was not a raid but more a reconnaissance in force; a way of trying out large scale amphibious assault to capture a defended European port intact.

  2. How did the Holocaust happen, and who is responsible?

    Positions of influence such as lawyers, teachers and civil servants were no longer available to Jews, and they were sacked. During 1934 there was an increase in anti-Jewish propaganda as local councils banned Jews from parks, swimming pools and playing fields; removing the Jewish people's rights to enjoy themselves in public.

  1. The origins of the first world war

    nations to avoid trade with France, which lead to further threats of peace. This unmissable mistrust in Europe soon lead to build up of armies, which further threatened stability. The excuse of ensuring peace was to create an army forceful enough to defend the homeland.

  2. Why did Germany lose the second world war?

    This declaration not only made America form the Grand Alliance with Britain, France and Russia, it gave the allies thousands more fresh troops, vehicles and equipment. Italy was not much help either. Hitler's involvement in the Spanish Civil War of 1936 - 1939, (he used his new weapons to support the fascist Franco)

  1. To what extent was Germany responsible for World War 1

    This means to say that the war was planned as a way to remove domestic pressures inside of Germany and was not really a true foreign policy plan. The destructive impact of industrialisation caused tensions in Germany?s social and economic structure, including the tension for constitutional change and social change.

  2. Germany was more responsible than Britain for the naval race before the First World ...

    Source C was written by Admiral Scheer of the German Navy after the world war. The source points out that Germany's cause for her naval increment was to protect their colonies, political and economic expansions. Germany also felt that they had little freedom as Britain was always in competition and never granted the freedom of the seas.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work