• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The factors that led to the downfall of Apartheid in South Africa

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Brian Lockyer History essay - fall of Apartheid 34/04/08 "By 1989, South Africa was descending into chaos. The African National Congress had given the order, make South Africa ungovernable. Assess the role played by the different protest groups in the country during the 1980's as well as international pressure and discuss which played the biggest role in bringing apartheid to the end" There were many factors that led to the downfall of apartheid; I believe that it was a combination of aspects and not just a certain aspect that led to the eventual demise of the Apartheid government. These factors can be broken down into domestic factors such as riots, protest groups, sabotage etc and international factors that include economic sanctions, the banning of South African sport teams as well as the total expulsion of South Africa from international relations as well as the fall of the Soviet Union and the end of the cold war. ...read more.

Middle

The majority of South Africans were unhappy and voiced their concerns by protest, reasons for anger included political deprivation, economic deprivation, ANC exiled and other apartheid laws. Heavily armed riot police tried to break up the rioters but to no avail. The people were tired of prejudice, they did not want a reformed apartheid, they wanted no apartheid. The violence was at an all time high by the year 1985 with mass demonstrations and riots erupting everywhere, this forced the NP government to declare a state of emergency. The growth of violence was one factor that led to the end of Apartheid because the South African government received a lot of pressure from other countries and world leaders. It was also the increased media coverage from hostile countries which showed the world how widespread and devastating Apartheid had become, but it wasn't just one event that caused the end of Apartheid it was all of them put together which finally ended Apartheid in 1990. ...read more.

Conclusion

The US wanted South Africa on her side and wanted to keep her happy as South Africa was viewed as a pillar of capitalistic strength in Africa. The US also wanted control of the trade and shipping routes that go past South Africa and did not want them to fall in the hands of the soviets. It was only once communism had ended that the US put pressure on South African to end apartheid. All of these consequences of Apartheid finally came about to bring it to an end with a man called De Klerk, who was an instrumental figure in bringing about the end of the Apartheid regime. De Klerk replaced P.W Botha in 1989, De Klerk was a man who went against his family's history and legacy and ultimately saved South Africa from a bloody civil war. He was the man who started the negotiations for the release of Nelson Mandela and the unbanning of the ANC and PAC all which ended the brutal regime of Apartheid and saved South Africa from more years of bloodshed and suffering. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Tsar downfall

    If the army had been successful in the war this would have been a triumph for the Tsar, as he would have been seen as a hero who won the war.

  2. Free essay

    Do you consider military intervention in Africa as successful? Focus on the policies in ...

    successful in achieving its mandate, both as a peacekeeping force and as an agent of political change, (Macqueen, 2002, p258 and Doyle & Otunnu, 1998, p221). Twelve years after the UN's peace implementation efforts, Namibia is still largely at peace.

  1. Nicholas’ downfall

    They feared the worse for their country and did not want to come under German rule. Nicholas' main reason for not wanting to go to war was because he would be fighting family. His family took the shape of the German emperor Kaiser Wilhelm.

  2. Lion Led By Donkeys

    John D Clare produces textbooks for schools and would aim to produce a balanced argument. I believe that the source would not be bias as it is focus on facts. The author also has the benefit of hindsight and is able to produce an accurate and reliable source.

  1. American History.

    Fr�mont], General Zachary Taylor secured northeastern Mexico and General Winfield Scott went all the way to Mexico City and captured it. - The result was the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo (signed in February 1848) which got the US California, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, Arizona and the RG Texas border and got Mexico a very pathetic reparations payment of $15 million.

  2. Dismantling Violence in Mozambique.

    This paper will explore Nordstrom's notion of understanding war and creatively overcoming violence through shared stories. Nordstrom argues that violence is a learned cultural product. She disagrees with the Hobbesian notion that "the natural state of humans is a violent one" and that only the elite or the institutions can achieve order in a state (12).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work