• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The factors that led to the downfall of Apartheid in South Africa

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Brian Lockyer History essay - fall of Apartheid 34/04/08 "By 1989, South Africa was descending into chaos. The African National Congress had given the order, make South Africa ungovernable. Assess the role played by the different protest groups in the country during the 1980's as well as international pressure and discuss which played the biggest role in bringing apartheid to the end" There were many factors that led to the downfall of apartheid; I believe that it was a combination of aspects and not just a certain aspect that led to the eventual demise of the Apartheid government. These factors can be broken down into domestic factors such as riots, protest groups, sabotage etc and international factors that include economic sanctions, the banning of South African sport teams as well as the total expulsion of South Africa from international relations as well as the fall of the Soviet Union and the end of the cold war. ...read more.

Middle

The majority of South Africans were unhappy and voiced their concerns by protest, reasons for anger included political deprivation, economic deprivation, ANC exiled and other apartheid laws. Heavily armed riot police tried to break up the rioters but to no avail. The people were tired of prejudice, they did not want a reformed apartheid, they wanted no apartheid. The violence was at an all time high by the year 1985 with mass demonstrations and riots erupting everywhere, this forced the NP government to declare a state of emergency. The growth of violence was one factor that led to the end of Apartheid because the South African government received a lot of pressure from other countries and world leaders. It was also the increased media coverage from hostile countries which showed the world how widespread and devastating Apartheid had become, but it wasn't just one event that caused the end of Apartheid it was all of them put together which finally ended Apartheid in 1990. ...read more.

Conclusion

The US wanted South Africa on her side and wanted to keep her happy as South Africa was viewed as a pillar of capitalistic strength in Africa. The US also wanted control of the trade and shipping routes that go past South Africa and did not want them to fall in the hands of the soviets. It was only once communism had ended that the US put pressure on South African to end apartheid. All of these consequences of Apartheid finally came about to bring it to an end with a man called De Klerk, who was an instrumental figure in bringing about the end of the Apartheid regime. De Klerk replaced P.W Botha in 1989, De Klerk was a man who went against his family's history and legacy and ultimately saved South Africa from a bloody civil war. He was the man who started the negotiations for the release of Nelson Mandela and the unbanning of the ANC and PAC all which ended the brutal regime of Apartheid and saved South Africa from more years of bloodshed and suffering. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Lion Led By Donkeys

    However, Terraine reminds us that Russia lost 4.5 million, soldiers during the German invasion of 1941 compared to British who only lost 415,000 at the Battle of the Somme, Terraine also said that the Battle of the Somme was not futile, in actually fact the turning point of the war, as the German army had been utterly worn out.

  2. Nicholas’ downfall

    They feared the worse for their country and did not want to come under German rule. Nicholas' main reason for not wanting to go to war was because he would be fighting family. His family took the shape of the German emperor Kaiser Wilhelm.

  1. Tsar downfall

    If the army had been successful in the war this would have been a triumph for the Tsar, as he would have been seen as a hero who won the war.

  2. Free essay

    Do you consider military intervention in Africa as successful? Focus on the policies in ...

    Between 1987 and 1994, military forces deployed in peacekeeping operations increased from fewer than ten thousand to more than seventy thousand. The annual peacekeeping budget accordingly skyrocketed from $230 million to $3.6 billion in the same period (Findlay, 2002, pp3-7 and Doyle & Otunnu, 1998, p6).

  1. American History.

    Catholics as the source of the problem - most Catholics favored self-control over state laws. 28. Reason for Dorothea Dix's fame Penitentiaries and Asylums - state institutions to hold criminals began? w/good intentions [rehabilitate them], but they soon became overcrowded and inhumane.

  2. What factors have prompted democratisation in Argentina?

    Galtieri faced problems right from the moment he took power. The military had been split between 'hard-liners' and 'soft-liners.' Viola, who preceded Galtieri, had put in place a strategy of liberalisation, and wanted to 'open a dialogue with sympathetic civilians and reinforce a veneer of legality and legitimacy upon the military-dominated state.'6.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work