• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'The First World War arose primarily as a result of German aggression.' How far do you agree with this opinion? Use Sources 1, 2 and 3 and your own knowledge related to this controversy

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Lara June 2013 ?The First World war arose primarily as a result of German aggression.? How far do you agree with this opinion? Although the war guilt clause in the 1919 Treaty of Versailles burdened Germany with the complete responsibility for starting WWI, German aggression cannot be held solely accountable for the outbreak of WWI, as implied by Sources 1, 2 and 3. In fact, as a result of the alliance systems and recent troubles in the Balkans; tensions across Europe had been simmering for quite some time prior to WWI. What is more, the increasing competition between Britain and Germany to drastically develop their navies indisputably made these countries more open to the prospect of war due to having such an advanced naval force. Indeed, the German War Council in 1912 and the annexation of Belgium in summer 1914 emphasises how Germany was acting aggressively; yet this alone cannot be considered the only reason why war transpired in July/August 1914. Firstly, Sources 1 and 2 acknowledge the existence of German aggression in the run-up to war. Predominantly, Taylor in Source 1?s assertion that the German people had, ?Trained themselves psychologically for aggression? represents underlying aggressive behaviour from Germany. ...read more.

Middle

However, Howard in Source 3 alludes to the other dominant European alliance: the Triple Alliance of Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy, ?Austria-Hungary needed German support to confront Russia?. The connotations of ?needed? portray a complete dependence on the 1879 German-Austria alliance to act aggressively towards Russia and the Balkans. Therefore, the German ?Blank Cheque?, promising unconditional support, offered to Austria in July 1914 was arguably due to the necessity of Germany having to support her ally, Austria rather than German aggression. Consequently, the implications of the various alliances making declarations of war more likely were inevitably fundamental in triggering war in 1914. Furthermore, the elevating tensions caused by the crisis in the Balkans undeniably provided the resentment necessary for war by 1914, as noted by Sources 1 and 3. Notably, Source 3?s assertion that war, ?Arose from rivalry between the Habsburg Monarchy and Russia?over the disintegrating empire?in the Balkan peninsula? conveys that the conflict in the Balkans gave Austria and Russia the means to declare war on each other. In fact, following the Austrian annexation of Bosnia in 1908; the desire for Balkan independence grew drastically, especially in Serbia. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore, despite the Naval Race only taking place between Germany and Britain, the strength of their respective navies by 1914 inevitably encouraged the countries to become entangled in war due to the possibility of demonstrating their naval dominance to other European Powers. In conclusion, although Germany was indeed acting aggressively prior to WW1; this behaviour from Germany cannot be seen as the only means of provoking WW1. Rather the hostility of the European alliances and the elevating tensions originating from the Balkan crisis were fundamental in causing a general war in 1914. The growing resentment between Austria and Russia over the ambiguous state of the Balkans inevitably caused these Powers to call upon their respective allies for support, especially Germany and France, once the Serbian ultimatum was rejected in July 1914. Although the Naval race between Britain and Germany provided them with a navy strong enough to withstand war, the mounting conflict amongst their allies undeniably led them into declarations of war. Therefore, despite the guilt placed on Germany by the Treaty of Versailles and historians like Fritz Fischer; German aggression was a minor contributor to starting war compared with the animosity created by the European alliances and the Balkan crisis. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The impact of the First World War merely heightened existing social and political tensions ...

    4 star(s)

    were far too timid as it took a week for a politician to demand a resignation from the Chancellor, which could be shown as another way in which WWI didn't just "merely increase" the tensions in Germany.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Decisions made in Berlin from 1900 determined the outbreak of war in Europe in ...

    3 star(s)

    The fact it's also a book also disputes this aspect as it was obviously made to make money and so certain interpretations such as this one which could be something of that intent. Sources 1 and 3 also mention the aggressive nature of Germany which is a decision in itself to cause the outbreak of war.

  1. The outbreak of war in Europe in 1914 was due to an aggressive German ...

    his argument, this was supposedly a meeting called by the Kaiser involving his closest generals to agree upon plans for war with France and Germany. This seems to be rather damning evidence and could be argued to prove that Germany had for some years planned war and is therefore to blame.

  2. Versailles Treaty- evaluation of sources

    Most importantly, Brest-Litovsk is a typical example of the nature of most treaties including Versailles. It underlines the advantage that the winning party possesses. The implication that if Germans can exercise such treatments to other countries then it is right for them to be treated the same when they happen to be on the receiving end is created.

  1. The Holocaust was the result of Hitlers long held grand design to pursue a ...

    sinfulness- all could be explained by the presence of that single factor in the universe, a miscreation that disturbed the world?s steady accent towards well-being, affluence, success, victory?In Hitler?s obsessed mind, as in the delusive imaginings of the medieval millenarian sectaries, the Jews were the demonic hosts whom he had

  2. Nazi consolidation of power in 1933 was primarily due to their use of violence ...

    The ?excuse? for the passing of this decree was simply as a result of the threat posed by the communists, thus justifying the Nazis? behaviour. However the Nazi consolidation of power was once again maintained using violence within this situation, as after the final week of the election campaign, hundreds of anti-Nazis were arrested and the violence continued.

  1. Albert Speers Role as German Armaments Minister during the War

    When the war started Speer gradually assumed a greater role within Hitler?s inner circle and with it more power. Speer was appointed Department Chief of Public Works and was responsible for 26 000 workers as well as directing building construction work for the army and air force, such as three

  2. Causes of WWI and the roles of Women before WW1

    Their employment was predominantly textiles, domestic services as well as coalmines. With independent wages, women experienced a better sense of living. The fact that women gained employment is a rejection of the notion that women were safer within the confines of the home.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work