• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The First World War - questions and answers on the Schlieffen plan, and the Western Front and its stalemate.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The First World War Lucy Bawn Explain How the Schlieffen plan was meant to work. In 1894, France had made a treaty with Russia, meaning that if France or Russia ever declared war or became under attack they would fight for each other. When Germany declared war on France in 1914, they soon realised they would have to fight a war on two fronts; Russia and France. The German Chief Of Staff, Count Alfred Von Schlieffen, designed the Schlieffen Plan, thought up in 1905, to defeat France and their allies Russia. The plan intended that1.5million of Germany's men would win the war in just six weeks. They aimed to invade France through Belgium, en-circle Paris and therefore becoming behind the French army to the lack of their knowledge, and attack France form the rear, making them surrender. By doing this they would have captured Paris, thus being the capital, making Germany in control of France. Unfortunately for them they were not able to do this. As this would be an extremely rapid victory, Germany would then be able to concentrate on attacking Russia as by this time they would have only just mobilised. This was to be if Russia mobilised in six weeks. Regrettably, this plan failed as Belgium refused to let the German army through to attack France. This caused the Germans to lose time, as they had to attack Belgium. ...read more.

Middle

These battles all made stalemate even longer, as the Germans had not planned for this to happen in the Schlieffen Plan. In all of these battles neither allies were strong enough to break all stalemate. In some places stalemate was broken but easily taken back as they couldn't keep up the defence. The following were equally important reasons why the stalemate on the western front was broken: New technology like the tank The American entry into the war The blockading of German ports The German offensive in March 1918 Explain how far you agree with this statement. The new technology invented in the duration of World War One made a dramatic impact to the events which occurred. The impact was usually immediate, such as when the German U-boat was introduced it sank three British Cruisers in the North Sea. Though the technology was not always successful or efficient. The Tanks were first introduced on the 15th September 1916 in the Battle of The Somme, Lead by Sir Douglas Haig. This had very little impact on as they were used in too small of a number, only 49 to reinforce infantry attacks, and 18 of those broke down all too easily. The intension was to scare German infantry, though all they saw was shambles. The first positive use of tanks was at the Battle of Cambrai, where there were 380 tanks present and they broke the stalemate but were unable to hold the land they gained. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Germans eventually ground to a halt, allowing the British to regroup. All of the above were very important in breaking the stalemate on the western, though you should not be mislead that any of them broke stalemate single handed. The new weapons that were introduced were an important stage of winning the war, as well as a huge advance in technology. The weapons were not all that great, as when Britain invented a new machine gun or ship, Germany soon copied and Visa Versa. As time went on and the German men became tired, Britain decided to block the German ports. The blockade of German ports meant that no supplies could get through and the German females and children began to starve. The soldiers became concerned for their families, and lost moral to continue with the war, resulting in them becoming weaker. Germany's final attempt to win the war, 'Operation Michael' was destroyed when America entered the war in April 1917. The fresh new soldiers and supplies made British stronger and Germany was becoming considerably weak. Eventually, the British along with the Americans pushed Germany back into her own country, but before this could happen they asked for an armistice and it was signed on 11 November 1918. This peace treaty was signed at Versailles in January 1919: it told the Germans they had to return land, African colonies were to be shared, they had to accept blame and to pay war reparations of �6600 million. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Schlieffen Plan and the Reality

    This would consequently weaken the German army and unbalance it. Having helped the Belgians hold the Germans up at Mons, the BEF then moved to support the French on the River Marne and prevent the Germans from reaching Paris. Losses were heavy and by December 1914 more than half of the BEF were dead.

  2. To what extent did the failure of the Schlieffen Plan cause Germany's defeat on ...

    The results were immediate and supplies began to reach Britain. Prior to this, at one point there had been just six weeks of supplies left. Meanwhile American shipyards replaced any sunken vessels. From June 1917 to November 1918 just 154 ships were torpedoed out of 16,539.

  1. The failure of the Schlieffen Plan - Stalemate.

    This was supplied in the battle of the Marne. * 3 September: Opening on Kluck's right flank perceived by Galieni, military governor of Paris * 5 September: Manoury VI Army fell on Kluck; 6 September order for general Allied offensive given. * British headed for gap between I & II Armies as Kluck removed forward & left flank guards

  2. How important was Haig's tactics on the Western Front in bringing an end to ...

    over whether he was really a hero, or a butcher of men. Haig was a friend of the King due to his wealthy and upperclass background, he had great respect amongst the ranks. Haig's ideas formed while he was in a cavalry office in Africa, a long time before the War.

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    With this, the causualty toll in fighting in the year 2000 stood at eight Israeli soldiers dead and 25 wounded, 24 SLA members killed and 37 injured, 10 guerrillas dead and eight hurt, five Lebanese civilians dead and 61 wounded, one Lebanese soldier injured and two U.N.

  2. Analyse the impact of the USA's entry into WWI both in influencing the eventual ...

    One of these historians, A. J. P. Taylorvi, has suggested that other forces played a more momentous contribution in influencing the eventual Allied victory. The first of these noteworthy, contributing factors can be attributed to the failure of the 1918 German offensives.

  1. The Marshall Plan.

    Raw materials and fuel are in short supply. Machinery is lacking or word out. The farmer of the peasant cannot find the goods for sale which he desires to purchase. So the sale of his farm produce for money which he cannot use seems to him an unprofitable transaction.

  2. The Origins of the First World War - Sources Questions

    1914 rather than the product of long standing rivalries between the great powers". Assess the truth of this opinion on the causes of the outbreak of World War One. The conclusive nature of the opinion in question, undermines the part accuracy of it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work