• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The First World War - questions and answers on the Schlieffen plan, and the Western Front and its stalemate.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The First World War Lucy Bawn Explain How the Schlieffen plan was meant to work. In 1894, France had made a treaty with Russia, meaning that if France or Russia ever declared war or became under attack they would fight for each other. When Germany declared war on France in 1914, they soon realised they would have to fight a war on two fronts; Russia and France. The German Chief Of Staff, Count Alfred Von Schlieffen, designed the Schlieffen Plan, thought up in 1905, to defeat France and their allies Russia. The plan intended that1.5million of Germany's men would win the war in just six weeks. They aimed to invade France through Belgium, en-circle Paris and therefore becoming behind the French army to the lack of their knowledge, and attack France form the rear, making them surrender. By doing this they would have captured Paris, thus being the capital, making Germany in control of France. Unfortunately for them they were not able to do this. As this would be an extremely rapid victory, Germany would then be able to concentrate on attacking Russia as by this time they would have only just mobilised. This was to be if Russia mobilised in six weeks. Regrettably, this plan failed as Belgium refused to let the German army through to attack France. This caused the Germans to lose time, as they had to attack Belgium. ...read more.

Middle

These battles all made stalemate even longer, as the Germans had not planned for this to happen in the Schlieffen Plan. In all of these battles neither allies were strong enough to break all stalemate. In some places stalemate was broken but easily taken back as they couldn't keep up the defence. The following were equally important reasons why the stalemate on the western front was broken: New technology like the tank The American entry into the war The blockading of German ports The German offensive in March 1918 Explain how far you agree with this statement. The new technology invented in the duration of World War One made a dramatic impact to the events which occurred. The impact was usually immediate, such as when the German U-boat was introduced it sank three British Cruisers in the North Sea. Though the technology was not always successful or efficient. The Tanks were first introduced on the 15th September 1916 in the Battle of The Somme, Lead by Sir Douglas Haig. This had very little impact on as they were used in too small of a number, only 49 to reinforce infantry attacks, and 18 of those broke down all too easily. The intension was to scare German infantry, though all they saw was shambles. The first positive use of tanks was at the Battle of Cambrai, where there were 380 tanks present and they broke the stalemate but were unable to hold the land they gained. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Germans eventually ground to a halt, allowing the British to regroup. All of the above were very important in breaking the stalemate on the western, though you should not be mislead that any of them broke stalemate single handed. The new weapons that were introduced were an important stage of winning the war, as well as a huge advance in technology. The weapons were not all that great, as when Britain invented a new machine gun or ship, Germany soon copied and Visa Versa. As time went on and the German men became tired, Britain decided to block the German ports. The blockade of German ports meant that no supplies could get through and the German females and children began to starve. The soldiers became concerned for their families, and lost moral to continue with the war, resulting in them becoming weaker. Germany's final attempt to win the war, 'Operation Michael' was destroyed when America entered the war in April 1917. The fresh new soldiers and supplies made British stronger and Germany was becoming considerably weak. Eventually, the British along with the Americans pushed Germany back into her own country, but before this could happen they asked for an armistice and it was signed on 11 November 1918. This peace treaty was signed at Versailles in January 1919: it told the Germans they had to return land, African colonies were to be shared, they had to accept blame and to pay war reparations of �6600 million. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did a stalemate occur on the Western Front?

    The allies now took the offensive role, and attacked the German's up the river Aisne. With no apparent gains appearing, both sides began to 'dig in' and establish their trenches on 14th September. The Battle of River Aisne marked the beginning of stabilised trench warfare.

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    He knew that one way of reducing taxes was cutting expenditure and defence was an obvious target. In 1983 the USA spent $300,000,000,000 on defence. More than the entire British budget. Why did Communism and Eastern Europe collapse, and with what consequences?

  1. Account for the development of stalemate on the Western Front by the end of ...

    invading Belgium, assumed that Russia would not mobilise for at least six weeks, inadequately protected the Eastern Front and did not take in to account human misfortunes which would alter the strict timetable structure of the Plan. These faults meant that the plan was extremely inflexible and left Moltke with

  2. Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front

    this was a key battle as whoever got control of the ports would have an upper hand receiving re-enforcements and equipment. The Germans (now facing a two-front war) noticed they could not get through enemy lines but if they managed to get control of the ports they would not be

  1. What Broke the Stalemate Stalemate is the word used to describe the situation on ...

    On the eighteenth of July Foch gathered all his forces for a great counter-attack. After a fortnight of heavy fighting they drove the Germans back from the Marne. Foch kept up the pressure. On 8 August he sent British forces into the attack.

  2. Sclieffen Plan &There were 4 main reasons 'why the stalemate on the Western front ...

    If they took any longer, there would be a war on two fronts which they had been trying to avoid.

  1. Analyse the impact of the USA's entry into WWI both in influencing the eventual ...

    In particular, the attacking German forces, under Ludendorff's orders, contributed heavily to German failure by attacking in a manner that almost guaranteed their defeat. Upon encountering strong Allied resistance, German forces "went on attacking even when they met obstinate resistance"vii.

  2. Explain how the schlieffen plan was meant to work The schlieffen plan was concocted ...

    On the other hand it did play a tiny part in invading trenches and gaining land. So to summerise I disagree, the new technology's are not that important to breaking the stalemate. America entering the war was a great advantage for Britain.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work