• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The First World War Sources Questions

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Jonathan Clay History Coursework First topic The First World War Why did the Germans fail to achieve victory in the west in 1914? 1. Look at sources A and B. Explain how Moltke modified the Schlieffen Plan. Use the maps your knowledge and any other sources that may be relevant. Moltke made some very significant changes to the original Schlieffen Plan. The original Schlieffen Plan wanted the German infantry be concentrated in one force as it shows in source A. Alfred von Schlieffen wanted the German infantry to be concentrated in a single sweep so that all the forces would go through Belgium and down to Paris (France). However, Moltke wanted to spread out the forces instead of concentrating them in one place as it shows in both source A and source B. Moltke proposed to position the forces down the western border shared with France. He also wanted to withdraw forces away from the western frontier and put them on the Russian border as a precaution in case of a Russian attack. This meant that forces in the western frontier would not be as strong as they could have been. Source A shows that General Moltke did not put any forces where General Schlieffen wanted them. Moltke spread his forces out too much so that each force would be too weak. ...read more.

Middle

Source F will also be quite useful to a historian because it shows cavalry retreating from possibly the battle Ypres, it is not mentioned in the source. However, cavalry did retreat from the battle of Ypres so that photograph is historically accurate and useful to a historian. However, Source F could be useful to a historian as it shows that the British soldiers using Lee Enfield rifles, which is accurate, and it would be useful to a historian. Furthermore, source F shows that the infantry fought alongside the cavalry, which was correct in 1914. This would also be useful to a historian. This shows that both sources could be useful to a historian studying the First World War. 4. Read sources H and I. Which of the two German comments on the failure of the Schlieffen plan is likely to be more reliable? Give reasons for your answer. Both comments are relatively reliable as they are both written at appropriate times (both sources are written around the time of the First World War). Furthermore, both sources are written by highly respected German generals. Source I seems to be more reliable because General Ludendorff was explaining the reason for the failure of the German offensive. This means that he would be willing to be truthful about the blame. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source G shows the first Battle of Ypres and shows the British holding their positions and stopping most of the Germans from breaking through. This source disagrees with the statement because it is saying that the British stopped the German offensive in 1914. Source H says that the German army is very tired and that is why it is ineffective. This shows that this source disagrees with the statement because it does not say that the German offensive of 1914 failed. Source I shows that General Ludendorff believed that the weakness of the German right wing contributed to the failure of the German offensive. This source then agrees with the statement as it is against the Schlieffen Plan because it is saying that some parts of the German offensive were too weak as a result of the Schlieffen plan. Overall, it seems that the opinions of the sources are very close to being neutral. Many sources agree that the Schlieffen plan was the only reason for the Failure of the 1914 German offensive. These sources agree with the statement. However, there are also a high number of sources that agree that the British Expeditionary Force defence ("the old contemptibles") was the dominant reason for the failure of the 1914 German offensive. There is also a minority of sources that believe that the German Offensive did not fail. These two opinions both disagree with the statement. The sources are balanced the opinions are split three ways. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The failure of the Schlieffen Plan - Stalemate.

    Ranged against: 'rump' of Labor Party, majority of trade union movement and Catholic Church. * Dr Daniel Mannix 'leader' of anti-conscriptionists; Amongst Irish, British suppression of 'Easter Uprising' of 1916 was seen as savage and extreme. ? Results close.

  2. Vietnam Coursework Sources Questions

    This war they were now fighting was very different to the expectation and formerly normal "set-piece" battles were very rare. This source was written by a volunteer who fought in Vietnam so his feelings were very likely to be the same as many young Americans at the time.

  1. World War One Sources Questions

    Overall, I would say the source A is the more reliable source. Although source A doesn't give us all the information we need about artillery bombardment in world war 1, source A gives us more information about the period around 1916 and the Battle of the Somme.

  2. The Origins of the First World War - Sources Questions

    The fact that they are both British weakens their significance further. Their views could easily have been influenced by the European rivalries, which were developing at this time. Germany's expenditure of armaments rose in the years 1880 - 1914 as shown in source six.

  1. American History.

    - Strategically, the deal was a major dream, but there was the ever-annoying question: was it Constitutional for Jefferson to buy the land [didn't say in Constitution that Presidents could buy land]? Jefferson considered amending the Constitution for it, but decided the President's implied powers were enough.

  2. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work.

    It was a shock weapon that most certainly had the element of surprise. At first, the tanks seemed to be slow and would only travel at about 2-3 miles per hour. However, they were rapidly improving. The other problems with the tank were the fumes, the noise, and the leaking carbon monoxide.

  1. Armed forces.

    The Mary Rose is testimony to the size and power that the King sought to develop. He wanted a navy to project his power and influence onto the European political scene. Unfortunately, his plans and schemes were not fully realized during his reign.

  2. Britain and the First World War

    However because of Lloyd George's ambience of being Prime Minister he did not want to become a much hated man in the country. So to hide this dislike he had two diaries one public and one personal which shows perhaps his true views.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work