• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The First World War Sources Questions

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Jonathan Clay History Coursework First topic The First World War Why did the Germans fail to achieve victory in the west in 1914? 1. Look at sources A and B. Explain how Moltke modified the Schlieffen Plan. Use the maps your knowledge and any other sources that may be relevant. Moltke made some very significant changes to the original Schlieffen Plan. The original Schlieffen Plan wanted the German infantry be concentrated in one force as it shows in source A. Alfred von Schlieffen wanted the German infantry to be concentrated in a single sweep so that all the forces would go through Belgium and down to Paris (France). However, Moltke wanted to spread out the forces instead of concentrating them in one place as it shows in both source A and source B. Moltke proposed to position the forces down the western border shared with France. He also wanted to withdraw forces away from the western frontier and put them on the Russian border as a precaution in case of a Russian attack. This meant that forces in the western frontier would not be as strong as they could have been. Source A shows that General Moltke did not put any forces where General Schlieffen wanted them. Moltke spread his forces out too much so that each force would be too weak. ...read more.

Middle

Source F will also be quite useful to a historian because it shows cavalry retreating from possibly the battle Ypres, it is not mentioned in the source. However, cavalry did retreat from the battle of Ypres so that photograph is historically accurate and useful to a historian. However, Source F could be useful to a historian as it shows that the British soldiers using Lee Enfield rifles, which is accurate, and it would be useful to a historian. Furthermore, source F shows that the infantry fought alongside the cavalry, which was correct in 1914. This would also be useful to a historian. This shows that both sources could be useful to a historian studying the First World War. 4. Read sources H and I. Which of the two German comments on the failure of the Schlieffen plan is likely to be more reliable? Give reasons for your answer. Both comments are relatively reliable as they are both written at appropriate times (both sources are written around the time of the First World War). Furthermore, both sources are written by highly respected German generals. Source I seems to be more reliable because General Ludendorff was explaining the reason for the failure of the German offensive. This means that he would be willing to be truthful about the blame. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source G shows the first Battle of Ypres and shows the British holding their positions and stopping most of the Germans from breaking through. This source disagrees with the statement because it is saying that the British stopped the German offensive in 1914. Source H says that the German army is very tired and that is why it is ineffective. This shows that this source disagrees with the statement because it does not say that the German offensive of 1914 failed. Source I shows that General Ludendorff believed that the weakness of the German right wing contributed to the failure of the German offensive. This source then agrees with the statement as it is against the Schlieffen Plan because it is saying that some parts of the German offensive were too weak as a result of the Schlieffen plan. Overall, it seems that the opinions of the sources are very close to being neutral. Many sources agree that the Schlieffen plan was the only reason for the Failure of the 1914 German offensive. These sources agree with the statement. However, there are also a high number of sources that agree that the British Expeditionary Force defence ("the old contemptibles") was the dominant reason for the failure of the 1914 German offensive. There is also a minority of sources that believe that the German Offensive did not fail. These two opinions both disagree with the statement. The sources are balanced the opinions are split three ways. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. American History.

    SC was satisfied and repealed its nullification law [but nullified the Force Act, which Jackson ignored]. - Although the crisis was over, neither side really had won a decisive victory. It took another crisis, this time over a nat'l bank, to make the thing clear...

  2. Armed forces.

    But with the removal of the Spanish, the English were free to develop an unprecedentedly successful economic venture. There were two main commercial activities that allowed the English to maximise there maritime advantage: Sugar and Slavery. In fact, these were two complemantary activities that would work very closely together.

  1. Hiroshima Coursework This piece of coursework will concentrate on three questions, all source based.

    In this extract of the text, it states that, 'killing hundreds of thousands of civilians' which suggests to the reader that a lot of people died e.g. 600,000. In fact, the death tally was approximately 70,000 in Hiroshima and approximately 36,000 in Nagasaki.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    The fears of the Lebanese Forces were being realized. In Beirut, fostered and stimulated by popular support, and frustrated to be blatantly ignored, the Lebanese forces announced they were unconcerned with the discussions and results of the conference, for it only aimed at consolidating Syrian hegemony over Lebanon.

  1. The Origins of the First World War - Sources Questions

    Both are secret memorandums, but this does not guarantee their accuracy, it simply indicates that the author was making objective judgments. Bertie's and Sanderson's thoughts, like that of Vierordt would not have influenced the nature of Weltpolitik, as they were not in a position to do so.

  2. The First World War - Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work.

    Everyone though that this was the weapon that could achieve a breakthrough. However, these gigantic machines moved at walking pace. They were very unreliable because even one small technical flaw could make the whole tank break down. More than half of them broke down before they got to the German trenches because they could not keep up.

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work.

    Question 2: Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front? There a numerous reasons why a stalemate developed on the Western Front. The main factor that led to the stalemate on the Western Front was the failure of the Schlieffen Plan.

  2. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work.

    The French were expected to concentrate their troops on the eastern frontier along the Alsace-Lorraine border and therefore have insufficient troops defending Paris. The French responded rapidly to the German threat. An additional postulation made in the Schlieffen Plan was that the Russian army would take a long time to mobilise.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work