• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The following were equally important reasons why the stalemate on the Western front was finally broken - New Technology, American Entry, Blockades and the March Offensive. How far do you agree?

Extracts from this document...


a) b) The following were equally important reasons why the stalemate on the Western front was finally broken: * new technology, like the tank * the American entry into the war * the blockading of German ports * the offensive in March 1918 Explain how far you agree with this statement. To see whether the above stated reasons were or were not equally important I am first going to look at each reason separately, before comparing their importance and seeing how they are inter-connected. I am also going to see if these four reasons alone are sufficient enough to explain why the stalemate was broken, or whether there are other important reasons which also need to be mentioned. During World War One, many new technological inventions were either used properly in warfare for the first time. One of there was the tank. Tanks are huge machines, which allowed soldiers to cross no man's land by giving them protection from machine-gun fire. The tank was first used during the Battle of the Somme on 15th September 1916. However, mechanically tanks were very unreliable, as the often broke down. They also tended to get stuck in mud and therefore needed the correct terrain in order to function properly. ...read more.


The Americans entered the war at around the same time that Russia withdrew from it. This helped to once again tip the balance of forces towards the Allies. In 1917 the Germans were running out of manpower and had to start recruiting schoolboys to fight in their army. The Americans provided fresh new troops, who were not tired from months, if not years, of fighting like the German, British and French troops were. The Americans had, even before they entered the war, provided a great deal of aid. After April 1917 they still continued to do this. In conclusion, I think that the American entry into the war was a very significant factor when it came to the stalemate being broken. The British Royal Navy used its submarines to stop supplies getting into Germany, just like the German submarines had done to Britain. The British, however, blockaded German ports in order to do this, rather than using unrestricted submarine warfare. Through the blockading of the German ports the Royal navy prevented imports of food, oil, chemicals and weaponry as far as possible. This method was much more successful than the German use of submarines. It caused serious hunger in Germany from 1916 through til 1918 and in the winter of 1918-1919 the Germans suffered from starvation. ...read more.


The causes for the stalemate being broken are interconnected. For example, the submarine was a new invention, and it was used by the British to blockade the German Ports, which was a significant factor towards winning the war. The German U-boats were used in unrestricted submarine warfare, which led to the American entry into the war. The American entry into the war gave the Allies enough manpower for Foch to carry out his counter-attack. I think the reasons for the stalemate being broken are not equally important. The American entry into the war is, I think the most important reason as it had many effects. The boost in morale made the Allied forces happier, and more willing to fight for their country. The extra manpower allowed Foch's counter-attack to take place, as well as tipping the balance of forces towards the Allies. The extra money provided by the Americans helped to buy more weapons and chemicals. It also ensured that the allied supplies were far superior to the German supplies. The American entry into the war was, in my opinion, the final factor, which ensured the allied victory. I think without the American entry into the war the stalemate would not have been broken for a much longer time, if it had been broken at all as the other factors alone were not enough to end the war. ?? ?? ?? ?? Emma Cheeseman, 10M History Summer Term 2002 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    All of these factors helped to break stalemate: New Technology, The American entry into ...

    3 star(s)

    German trade got reduced from $5.9 billion in 1914 down to $0.8 billion in 1917. German civilians were experiencing severe shortages. The German ports were blocked with help from the USA. The Germans responded with submarine warfare. Once America had joined the war they made themselves targets.

  2. How successful was German unrestricted submarine warfare?

    That is one way that in the long term, the German unrestricted submarine warfare failed; it partly brought the Americans into WW1. The allies used this disaster as an excuse to bring out more propaganda. And thus another, minor, short term failure for the Germans; more people enlisted, outraged at what had happened.

  1. Why did a stalemate occur on the Western Front?

    This resulted in confusion and creation of gaps in the German army where the BEF could attack. The German troops retreated back to the River Aisne, and this effectively ended the Schlieffen Plan. For Germany the hope for quick victory was over and the prospect of a 'two-front' war was still lingering.

  2. “Generals Win Battles, Resources Win Wars”. How Far Does Your Study of the Period ...

    only able to overcome due to the combination of adequate supplies and his ability to distribute those supplies prior to his careful direction of battle. Britain's broad industrial production and capable navy were more than sufficient to supply their own, whilst those selfsame fleets and distance from home denied Napoleon the same privilege.

  1. Why did World War 1 end so quickly after the years of stalemate?

    It can be no coincidence that Lundendorff decided that Germany could not keep going on the very day that Bulgaria decided to seek an armistice (25th September). At about the same time General Allenby advanced against the Turks in Palestine.

  2. Why Was Stalemate Broken in 1918?

    This boosted morale amongst the allies after several major setbacks as it provided fresh troops and supplies. The initial impact of America joining the war is not that great, as their standing army was quite small, their troops needed training and it took time to get them to the western front.

  1. Armed forces.

    Independent; Communist insurgency in Malaya; Israel created Berlin airlift LP's invented 1949 Ireland leaves the Commonwealth; Newfoundland and Labrador join Canada Nato created; China becomes Communist Orwell's 1984 1950 Korean war (1950 - 53); Schumann plan First Kidney transplant 1951 Cyprus bids for Independence Churchill PM; Festival of Britain ANZUS

  2. In the context of the period 1905-2005, how far do you agree that Khrushchev ...

    Collectivisation under Stalin, involved the mass consolidation of grain; under state control. In order to hasten the rate of state grain procurement, forceful measures had to be implemented; involving the genocide of Russia?s most prized agricultural labourers: Kulaks. The Virgin Lands Scheme removed the need for state interference in order to raise state grain procurement.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work