• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The following were equally important reasons why the stalemate on the western front was finally broken; New technology. The American entry into the war. The blockading of German ports. The German offensive in March 1918. Explain how far you agree.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question: The following were equally important reasons why the stalemate on the western front was finally broken; New technology. The American entry into the war. The blockading of German ports. The German offensive in March 1918. Explain how far you agree with this statement. NEW TECHNOLOGY: At the start of the war artillery was heavily used, its accuracy wand effectiveness were poor. There were no radios at the start, so they had to operate to a pre arranged plan. In early years of the war shortages of shells was a problem. But by the end of the war things had been improved; the shell shortage had been solved by the ministry of munitions b- also the accuracy was increased - the development of the 'Creeping Barrage'. And radios were now in use - although primitive But this alone was not the single factor that broke the Germans. The biggest problems with artillery remained, the mobility of the guns. ...read more.

Middle

Also the high commander in chief, General Pershing, was very in experienced - his last major assignment was the hunting down of a Mexican bandit leader. Similarly he was too excessive with his men, be liked using large amounts of man power. He also refused to allow his troops to fight under French or British control. However the overall impact of the US army entering the war was very significant indeed. For example the economic impact; in the 1st years of the war the allies and the Germans produced roughly equal amounts of coal - 350million tonnes, steel - 58million tonnes, iron 50million tonnes. Once the Americans came in, the allies then had 841million tonnes of coal, and massively increased amounts of steel and iron. Also the US had a very big psychological impact as they now had a far larger military man power. The Germans were expecting American entry into the war. And Germany then realised that they could no longer have won the war by attrition. ...read more.

Conclusion

But the Germans never actually achieved a t full breakout and by march 31st their attack had been contained. In May there was another German attack, which again nearly succeeded. The road to Paris was open briefly, but was halted by the US troops shortly. By august 8th, the allies ordered a counter attack at Amiens, which broke the Germans, and they then fell. It wasn't a question of if the lose, but when. In the summer and autumn, Germany was pushed back, and by September the allies had reached Germanys own front line, the Hindenburg Line. By now technology had had an effect; radios and artillery were made much more effective, and aided the destruction of the Hindenburg line, also tanks were greatly improved. And by now the allied blockade was causing major shortages of food, and fuel etc. which lead to declining morale at the Front. The Germans lost 400,000 men as a result of the Spring Offensive. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    All of these factors helped to break stalemate: New Technology, The American entry into ...

    3 star(s)

    However tanks sank into mud holes when it rained and they could not be pulled back out once they started to sink they were lost forever. Here is a quote from a British rifleman; he is talking of his sightings of the tanks in the first usage: "There before our

  2. How important was the war at sea

    The battle is also notable as the first in which tanks were used. At the outbreak of the war, there had been much sympathy for Germany in the USA, compounded by the British maritime policy, which interfered with US shipping.

  1. The Long March is embedded deep in the psychology of the Chinese communist party. ...

    China has 20 percent of the world's population but only seven percent of its agrarian areas. China's official goal with the one-child family is to keep the total population down to 1.2 billion by the year 2050. But many think they stand no chance, despite the draconian measures that have sometimes been taken to enforce the policy.

  2. Vietnam - reasons the US lost the war.

    People would go against Diem by supporting Ho Chi Minh and some examples are the way they responded to his government, setting up trails to get from the north to the south. Many saw Ho Chi Minh as a God figure in Vietnam.

  1. There are four main factors which affected the final outcome of the war: the ...

    There after U-boats destroyed a great number of boats heading for Britain. It was a new weapon called the torpeado that made submarine warfare so effective. Even the mightiest battleship was vulnerable to a torpedo from the smallest submarine. The mine also came into its own as a devastatingly affective weapon in the war at sea.

  2. Select and explain the most important turning points in WW1 between March 1918 and ...

    open revolt leading to the collapse of the country and end of the war. 2) Explain the part played by internal pressures (e.g. economic shortages and political upheaval) in the defeat of Germany. I believe there are three internal pressures that Germany had, which contributed to the defeat of Germany.

  1. Analyse the impact of the USA's entry into WWI both in influencing the eventual ...

    because of their implementation of this new tactic which managed to break through the Hindenburg Line and thus guarantee allied victory. Thereafter, Germany insisted on an immediate armistice, acknowledging that they have been defeated. New allied tactics therefore contributed greatly to the Allied victory, even more so than US involvement,

  2. Both sources A and B are interpretations by historians attempting to explain the Long ...

    In this source the Red Army are much more vulnerable than Source A. The Red Army 'flee' whereas in Source A they 'defeated' by the Kuomintang. This source indicates to the reader that the Red Army was unsuccessful in the Long March.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work