• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The foreign policy of the United States in the Middle East.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The foreign policy of the United States in the Middle East This presentation will be about Arab nationalism, the emergence and policies of the Baath Party and how the foreign policy of the United States helped to bring about a climate of fear and mutual suspicion in the region, which ultimately helped the establishment of a totalitarian regime in Iraq. Michel Aflaq and Salah Bitar originally founded the Baath Party in the early 1940's on the basis of German nationalism. Although Arab countries were nominally independent during that time, they saw these states as merely a creation of British imperialism, and thus longed for "One Arab nation with an eternal mission" (Avi, S, War and Peace In The Middle East). These two founders compared the status of the Arab states to the status of the German states before 1871 to empathise their quest for Arab nationalism and unity, which are the core of Baathist ideology. The Baath Party further saw imperialism as a force that prevented Arab "awakening or renaissance" and unity (Jasim, 1984, p31). Aflaq described pan-Arabism as "the awakening of the Arab spirit, which is a decisive stage in human history" (Jasim, 1984, p31); while Nationalism was described as "the very same feeling that binds the individual to his family, because the fatherland is only a base household" (ibid, p31). ...read more.

Middle

ourselves the question why the United States specifically supported a regime, whose goals were totally opposed to the last two American principles. The Soviet Union saw America's influence in the region as a serious liability to its own national interests. Moscow's Minister of Foreign Affairs justified the Soviet Union's concern by stating "the United States was not even in close proximity to the region, yet it influenced the balance of power within that region". (Virth, p15, 1984) Ultimately America's association with Saddam Hussein and the Baath regime can best be traced back to its obsession with the containment of Communism by urging coups against pro-Soviet governments and offering military aid to the countries opposing Communism, although these arms eventually would be turned against the US. The House Select Committee on Intelligence Activities gives a wonderful example of US twists in foreign policy and relations in its report. Even during the Baath Parties rule, the US encouraged Kurds in the north to rise up against the Baath Party, because it had severed its relationship with the shah of Iran, another US key ally for a certain period of time. What later happened is best described by quoting from the report of the Committee. "Documents in the committee's possession clearly show that the president, Dr Kissinger, and the shah hoped that the Kurds would not prevail. ...read more.

Conclusion

It is estimated that more than $10 billion worth of weapons were sold to Iran between 1972 and 1976. US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger saw Iran as "a pillar of stability in a turbulent and vital region. We now provide bank loans to assist Iran in purchasing both military equipment and services in the US". (Jasim, 1984, p56) In addition Iran cooperated with other American allied countries in the region, including Israel and Turkey, under the shah. This ultimately added to the already deep resentment in the Arab world of both the Iranian Shah and the United States for its policies. This deep suspicion would ultimately lead to the First Gulf War, which not only reshaped the whole Middle East Region, but also had tremendous consequences for the rest of the world. To thus revisit why the majority of people, including many in the Western world, supported Saddam Hussein and its party, it is important to look at the resurrection of Arab nationalistic feelings particularly after the Six Day War in 1967, which led to a humiliating defeat of the Arab world. This as well as American foreign policy of unconditional support for Israel and the creation and abandonment of allies, when they go past their use by date, helped bring about a totalitarian regime in Iraq. This regime, which was supported by Arabs and the West alike, eventually brought great misery and suffering to its people and others in the region. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why was the Six-day War of 1967 a Significant Turning Point in the History ...

    This land had previously given the Syrians the chance to bombard Israel from safety. But now Israel had control and now security.

  2. American economic foreign policy and the origins of the cold war

    postwar program from Great Britain and other European industrial countries as from the Soviet Union.25 The British were extremely hesitant at first, given that an unconditional commitment to multilateralism would threaten their sheltered export market, thereby exacerbating England's economic weakness.

  1. American History.

    corporations, a nat'l bank, and paper currency. They also supported reform - they were generally more enterprising and optimistic than the Democrats were. Whigs supporters were generally evangelical Protestants, Methodists, or Baptists - and were usually American-born or free black. The Democrats favored limited central gov't and were afraid of concentrated?

  2. To What Extent Have The Attempts For A Palestinian State Been Blocked By The ...

    the Foundation for Middle East peace explains, the settlements are 'aimed at consolidating Israel's ability to secure a permanent hold over these lands'. The effect this has on any attempt at Palestinian statehood is it practically makes it impossible, as the Israeli's grip on the area that would encompass the

  1. The Foreign Policy of the Lone Superpower

    But for Walter R. Roberts, co-founder of the Public Diplomacy Institute of George Washington University, "diplomacy has changed significantly over the past sixty years. Prior to World War II, diplomacy was essentially a government-to-government relationship. Since the war, it has broadened to include a government-to-foreign people connection" which he now

  2. Iraq-Undemocratic and Turbulent Iraq-Undemocratic and Turbulent

    rule in Northern Iraq.6 Then came the First World War and with it the defeat of the German army and their allies, including Turkey. As a result in 1919, Iraq, as well as Palestine, came under the control of Great Britain who proceeded to draw out the borders and establish

  1. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    During the Great Puritan Migration that followed (1629-42), about 16,000 settlers arrived in the Massachusetts Bay Colony. The Puritans set out to build a "city on a hill" intended to provide a model of godly living for the world. Strict Calvinists, strongly communal, and living in closely bound villages, they

  2. How significant was the presence of foreign powers as an influence on the nature ...

    Martin Kramer supports this by highlighting how young colonels, such as Nasser now wanted to ??propel the Arab world to unity, power and prosperity.??[6] The creation of the PLO in 1964 supports this by demonstrating the anti-imperialistic views Nasser wanted to implement, and by doing so, making his anti Zionist

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work