• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The foreign policy of the United States in the Middle East.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The foreign policy of the United States in the Middle East This presentation will be about Arab nationalism, the emergence and policies of the Baath Party and how the foreign policy of the United States helped to bring about a climate of fear and mutual suspicion in the region, which ultimately helped the establishment of a totalitarian regime in Iraq. Michel Aflaq and Salah Bitar originally founded the Baath Party in the early 1940's on the basis of German nationalism. Although Arab countries were nominally independent during that time, they saw these states as merely a creation of British imperialism, and thus longed for "One Arab nation with an eternal mission" (Avi, S, War and Peace In The Middle East). These two founders compared the status of the Arab states to the status of the German states before 1871 to empathise their quest for Arab nationalism and unity, which are the core of Baathist ideology. The Baath Party further saw imperialism as a force that prevented Arab "awakening or renaissance" and unity (Jasim, 1984, p31). Aflaq described pan-Arabism as "the awakening of the Arab spirit, which is a decisive stage in human history" (Jasim, 1984, p31); while Nationalism was described as "the very same feeling that binds the individual to his family, because the fatherland is only a base household" (ibid, p31). ...read more.

Middle

ourselves the question why the United States specifically supported a regime, whose goals were totally opposed to the last two American principles. The Soviet Union saw America's influence in the region as a serious liability to its own national interests. Moscow's Minister of Foreign Affairs justified the Soviet Union's concern by stating "the United States was not even in close proximity to the region, yet it influenced the balance of power within that region". (Virth, p15, 1984) Ultimately America's association with Saddam Hussein and the Baath regime can best be traced back to its obsession with the containment of Communism by urging coups against pro-Soviet governments and offering military aid to the countries opposing Communism, although these arms eventually would be turned against the US. The House Select Committee on Intelligence Activities gives a wonderful example of US twists in foreign policy and relations in its report. Even during the Baath Parties rule, the US encouraged Kurds in the north to rise up against the Baath Party, because it had severed its relationship with the shah of Iran, another US key ally for a certain period of time. What later happened is best described by quoting from the report of the Committee. "Documents in the committee's possession clearly show that the president, Dr Kissinger, and the shah hoped that the Kurds would not prevail. ...read more.

Conclusion

It is estimated that more than $10 billion worth of weapons were sold to Iran between 1972 and 1976. US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger saw Iran as "a pillar of stability in a turbulent and vital region. We now provide bank loans to assist Iran in purchasing both military equipment and services in the US". (Jasim, 1984, p56) In addition Iran cooperated with other American allied countries in the region, including Israel and Turkey, under the shah. This ultimately added to the already deep resentment in the Arab world of both the Iranian Shah and the United States for its policies. This deep suspicion would ultimately lead to the First Gulf War, which not only reshaped the whole Middle East Region, but also had tremendous consequences for the rest of the world. To thus revisit why the majority of people, including many in the Western world, supported Saddam Hussein and its party, it is important to look at the resurrection of Arab nationalistic feelings particularly after the Six Day War in 1967, which led to a humiliating defeat of the Arab world. This as well as American foreign policy of unconditional support for Israel and the creation and abandonment of allies, when they go past their use by date, helped bring about a totalitarian regime in Iraq. This regime, which was supported by Arabs and the West alike, eventually brought great misery and suffering to its people and others in the region. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why was the Six-day War of 1967 a Significant Turning Point in the History ...

    This land had previously given the Syrians the chance to bombard Israel from safety. But now Israel had control and now security.

  2. The role of foreign policy on democratic transitions in Armenia and Azerbaijan

    an ethnic war with each other, it is not surprise that the actual process of democratization in these countries is tentative and at times very slow. The years of conflict have left the local economies of each state weak, with widespread infrastructural damage and large refugee problems.

  1. The United Nations and the Iraq Conflict

    Boulder: Westview Press. 1994. pg. 3 3 United Nations. New York: United Nations. 2004. February 26, 2004. url: http://www.un.org/ 4 "Charter of the United Nations." United Nations. New York: United Nations. 2004. February 27, 2004. url: http://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/index.html 5 United Nations. New York: United Nations. 2004. February 27, 2004. url: http://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/index.html 6 United Nations.

  2. American economic foreign policy and the origins of the cold war

    As argued by Secretary of State Cordell Hull in 1944, "A world in economic chaos would be forever a breeding ground for trouble and war."10 A disciple of Woodrow Wilson, Hull articulated most effectively among American leaders the relationship between economics and war and the commitment to multilateralism.

  1. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    Commonwealth, and the Protectorate, ended with the restoration of the Stuarts in the person of Charles II. An amazing period ensued, during which colonies were founded and other acquisitions were made. In 1663, Carolina was chartered; settlement began in 1670, and from the start the colony flourished.

  2. History of the United States

    The territory later came under royal control as South Carolina (1721) and North Carolina (1729). In 1664 an English fleet arrived to claim by right of prior discovery the land along the Hudson and Delaware rivers that had been settled and occupied by the Dutch since 1624.

  1. The evidence of the deplorable behavior of the United States and its practices and ...

    directly violated fundamental human rights" (257) of not only the Chileans, but of the American citizens as well. Effectively, the text asserts, "The Chilean case shows that the most highly respected U.S. officials of both political parties consistently deceived their constituents about their own human rights policies" (261).

  2. How significant was the presence of foreign powers as an influence on the nature ...

    feelings heard labeling them the ??forces of evil??[7] The Arab Israeli conflict reached boiling point in 1967 resulting in the outbreak of the Six-Day War after border clashes between Israeli and Syrian forces.[8] The influence of Britain and France was substantial as they clearly sympathized with Israel.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work