• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The foreign policy of the Whitlam government.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The foreign policy of the Whitlam government This presentation will be about the foreign policy of the Whitlam government, why it was implemented and how it helped create a more independent Australian nation with better relations towards its neighbours. Australia's foreign policy until 1972 was primarily determined by the evolution of the Cold War and the ANZUS alliance. Australia committed itself to the anti-communist power bloc of the US, because it feared that most importantly its northern neighbour Indonesia, but also other surrounding Asian nations might fall to Communism. For its security alliance however, Australia had to pay a huge price, which was the involvement in the Korean and Vietnam War. The policies of the Liberal party, 23 years in office, became a matter of excessive domestic discord, as its foreign policy was careful not to offend the US/Britain. As Whitlam summed Australian foreign policy until 1972 its "foundation was fear of foreigners; its focus was fear of communism and because the fears in turn focused so sharply on China and the Chinese version of communism, they were rooted in racism". (Whitlam, G. The Whitlam Government) Australian prime minister Bob Hawke delivered the following speech on 24th May 1991, which summed up the foreign policy up to 72. ...read more.

Middle

However when the president of the US, Richard Nixon visited China in 1972, the world was in shock and the rightness of Whitlam's beliefs and in Australia's change of foreign policy was confirmed. Despite making very important strategic changes to Australia's foreign policy not all agreed in the rightness of Whitlam's foreign policy. This is the view of Grant Evans, a famous historian and expert on South East Asia: "The Whitlam government dramatically revitalized the Australian political landscape. It was a meteorite, short and dramatic, rather than a star, stable and lasting. In particular it had not tackled the essential task of self-reliance in defense. Until Australia grasped the nettle, the alliance with the US would always offer itself to Australia's governments as a simple and cheap way of apparently securing Australia." (Ibid, p47) In this statement Mr. Grant empathizes that Australia should become independent of the US, but he fails to look at Whitlam's achievements in foreign policy in South East Asia, which set a stone in order for Australia to "grasp the nettle", as he ironically implies. Whitlam's foreign policies did help create a more independent Australian nation. ...read more.

Conclusion

One regrets that at the present time it does not seem always to show much sympathy in every part of the world". (Whitlam, G The Whitlam Government) The US mistake in foreign policy, foreseen by the Labor leader in the 1950's, was sadly realized too late, as another speech 20 years later depicts: "We now enter a new and more hopeful era in our region. The settlement agreed upon by Washington and Hanoi is the settlement easily obtainable in 1954. The settlement now in reach - the settlement that 30 000 Australian troops were sent to prevent, the settlement which Mr. McMahon described in November 1967 as treachery - was obtainable on a dozen of occasions since 1954. " From the evidence it can be said that Australian foreign policy was changed because of Whitlam's wisdom, pre-knowledge and vision of a peaceful South East Asia and not one absorbed in fears, suspicion and war. The Whitlam government implemented its policies, because it recognized the mistake in following the US policy and because it made changes to its foreign policy that were achievable within Australia's constitution and that didn't sacrifice Australia's relationship with the US. Australia from 1972-75 thus became a more independent and secure nation by the belief of the Whitlam government for peace and closer relations towards its South East Asian neighbours. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    * Public transport was very cheap and very reliable. Such benefits counted for little compared to the loss of individual rights and freedoms, or the higher earnings and a much higher standard of living enjoyed in the West. What happened in Poland? * After Khrushchev's anti-Stalin speech, rioting broke out in June 1956.

  2. To what extend do you consider Mao's domestic policies more successful than his foreign ...

    This was a result of the following. Mao realized that not enough food was being produced and brought to the cities, because of the migration that took place in the Five Year Plan. Too much of the population was now working in the factories and the economic planner concluded that this was the fault of the peasants.

  1. US Policy towards Vietnam 1960-73

    He then was surrounded by a group of Buddhist monks and nuns who poured petrol over his head and then set fire to him. While this elderly monk was burning to death, the monks and nuns gave out leaflets calling for Diem's government to show "charity and compassion " to all religions.

  2. Introduction - US policy to Southeast Asia in general

    'Between 1945 and 1948, the American position oscillated between these two poles.'10 According to Rotter, 'Roosevelt gradually softened his anti-colonial position', held during the War11 and there was a shift in US policy away from the Trusteeship principle. In late 1944, the British, French and Dutch were told by the

  1. The role of foreign policy on democratic transitions in Armenia and Azerbaijan

    acknowledge the extent of the catastrophe, at which point he did not give any details on the effects of the explosion on agriculture, industry and the consequences on human lives. In essence, glasnost had failed because the government itself was not completely commited to it.

  2. The Foreign Policy of the Lone Superpower

    the affairs of the world as they joined the Allied powers against Hitler's forces after they were bombed by the Japanese on Pearl Harbor on 7 December 19415. Evidently, after the Second World War, the United States could no longer keep its hands to itself if it wanted to keep

  1. What is the relative importance of the foreign and external context of foreign policy ...

    and Austria all felt vulnerable to invasion in the years leading up to that invasion. And, though they appealed for League of Nations aid all were invaded in the lead up to the Second World war as a result of the policy of Appeasement which allowed Germany to rectify the wrongs it had been dealt at Versailles.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Indeed, Syrian foreign minister Abdal Halim Khaddam reportedly warned Lebanese politicians that the Lebanese Army was capable of uniting its ranks, staging a coup d'�tat, and imposing a military dictatorship. Nevertheless, Lebanon's first and last military government was short lived, resigning two days after its inception.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work