• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Future of Iraqi Military Power - Executive Summary

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

LIKE A PHOENIX FROM THE ASHES? The Future of Iraqi Military Power Executive Summary Despite its crushing defeat during the Gulf War, Iraq remains a potential regional power and the foremost long-term threat to U.S. interests in the Middle East. Iraq is still committed to acquiring nuclear weapons -- it will continue to do so as long as President Saddam Hussein and his regime survive -- and probably retains a residual biological and chemical warfare capability. Moreover, Iraq's armed forces are still the largest in the Gulf, and despite serious shortcomings, they pose a threat to Kurdish and Shi'i insurgents fighting in the north and south of the country as well as to neighboring Kuwait. Finally, Iraq has rebuilt much of its conventional military-industrial base since the war, as a first step toward its rearmament. For these reasons, Iraq is likely to be a major problem for the United States in the coming years. Sanctions have thus far been extremely effective in preventing Baghdad from restoring its military capabilities, (as distinct from its military-industrial base), thereby denying it the means to once again threaten regional peace and stability. ...read more.

Middle

Iraq will bring to this effort a detailed understanding of how to exploit the limitations of the UN's monitoring and verification efforts, conceal its activities from foreign intelligence agencies, and minimize the effects of bombing on facilities and equipment. The collapse of the Soviet Union may provide Iraq with unprecedented opportunities to acquire fissile material (weapons grade uranium or plutonium) and expertise with which to produce nuclear weapons, despite sanctions and inspections. Iraq also retains a residual biological and chemical warfare capability. It has the know-how to produce biological and chemical weapons and it is believed to have saved critical production equipment as well as seed stocks for producing biological agents. Iraq could probably produce biological agents at this time, despite sanctions and inspections, and given the opportunity it would almost certainly revive its chemical warfare program. It might also still have hidden stocks of biological and chemical agents produced before the Gulf War that it is saving for future contingencies. Finally, Iraq may have a scores of al-Husayn missiles that could provide a long-range delivery capability for stocks of biological or chemical agents which it may still possess. ...read more.

Conclusion

Iraq will constitute a potential threat to U.S. interests and allies as long as Saddam Hussein and his regime remain in power. Consequently, U.S. policy should actively seek the overthrow of Saddam Hussein and his regime, while aiming to contain Iraq by: Maintaining sanctions in order to deny Iraq the means to rebuild its military capabilities, and thereby undercut its ability to threaten regional peace and stability. Retaining a military presence in the region to deter Iraq and underscore the U.S. commitment to defend Kuwait and the Kurdish enclave against aggression. Maintaining the Gulf War coalition in order to preserve the viability of the military option in the Gulf and ensure the continued effectiveness of sanctions. Because Iraq has traditionally played a role in both the Persian Gulf and Arab-Israeli arenas, the costs of failing to prevent its rearming are potentially very high. At stake are regional peace and stability, the Arab-Israeli peace process, the security of Persian Gulf oil, the future of regional arms control, and the achievements of the Gulf War -- won at great expense and risk. For these reasons, the containment of Iraq-through deterrence and sanctions -- must remain a cornerstone of U.S. policy toward the region for as long as the current regime remains in power. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Free essay

    Do you consider military intervention in Africa as successful? Focus on the policies in ...

    In this case it is not sure whether the UN brought any unique qualities to the situation. The intervention had originally been one of a group of Francophone states mobilised by France itself. The shift to UN control did not even involve any fundamental change in personnel.

  2. Armed forces.

    Half a century after the death of Nelson and the Royal Navy had barely changed at all; even the ships were the same. The only serious innovation that made serious inroads into these traditions was the advent of steam. Even then, the Admiralty were reluctant converts to this latest technology and pined for the days of sail.

  1. Why did President Bush not invade Iraq after he had won so easily in ...

    negative aspects simply outweighed them.9 The United States helped boost their reputation with their decision to defend Kuwait from the evil tyrant Saddam Hussein. They were seen as noble for helping out a country that clearly could not fend for itself, which helped lessen their reputation as a country that

  2. The role of Saddam Hussain in serving the aims of America in the Middle ...

    the Organisation of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries. In terms of securing her oil needs, Britain started to explore and drill for oil in her lands and in the seas which surround the British Isles and she was not successful

  1. What are the arguments for and against the war on Iraq, What are the ...

    However, many people disagree with the war and they show this by protesting. Most would say the reasons for not going to war greatly outweigh the reasons for war. Here are the majority of them. It would cost at least 19,000 pounds to make the necessary amount of bombs and

  2. US President George Bush labelled Iran and Iraq as part of an "axis of ...

    the end of 1999' and a personal pledge from President Yeltsin to President Clinton assuring him that the Russians would not provide sensitive nuclear technology to Iran. In return, US economic sanctions against Russia were dropped.21 However, the pledge was 'meaningless'.

  1. A Summary of WWII.

    process that was to lead to the absorption in 1940 of Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania. They also made demands on Finland. The recalcitrant Finns were subdued in the Winter War of 1939-1940, but only after dealing the Russians several humiliating military reverses.

  2. An Iraqi Soldier.

    I put on my night vision goggles in the hope that it would enable me to see more easily. I was scouring the area, when I caught a glimpse of something, I took a shot at it, but nothing happened.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work