• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Great Terror was Primarily Driven by the Insecurities and Paranoia of Stalin himself. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐The Great Terror was Primarily Driven by the Insecurities and Paranoia of Stalin himself. To what extent do you agree with this statement? The Great Terror began in 1934, fuelled by Stalin?s decision to murder Kirov, and finally wound down in 1939 ? not before the authorisation of Trotsky?s murder (1940) who was at this time living in Mexico. The Great Terror was a period of paranoia and assassinations in Russia, where Stalin, through the use of imprisonment, murder and show trials, ruled with an Iron fist over Russia. Stalin?s personal insecurities and paranoia is known as a main cause of the Terror, but other influencing factors, like the power of the NKVD and economic pressures, also powered this era. The argument that it was Stalin?s personal insecurities that drove The Terror is a traditionalist?s view of history. Stalin was increasingly worried about his power base at this time, threatened by the support of Kirov in the 17th party congress; Stalin instigated The Terror to allow him to remove his rivals. Using the purges and applying the use of show trials and forced confessions, Stalin condemned his political rivals such as Bukharin, Kamenev & Zinoviev to death. After The Terror few of the original Bolsheviks were left. Robert Service, a respected author on this subject, can be cited to support the idea that Stalin?s character was the main cause of The Terror. ...read more.

Middle

The Terror was used as a tool to add pressure on workers to be more productive as well as a device to explain away failure. Stalin?s rapidly modernising Russia also needed a large amount of slave labour to construct new industrial areas quickly, this meant condemning thousands to the Gulags which kept the most valuable ?resource? ? people ? available to complete forced work in a fully expendable manner. Without the Gulag system it can be agreed that Stalin?s great achievements, like Magnitogorsk and the Belamor Canal, would not have been completed. Another cause which was incredibly influential was the fear of foreign threats in Russia, and the paranoia they fuelled. During the 1920s there were many external threats from right-wing governments abroad: Fascist Italy, Franco in Spain, Nazi Germany building momentum in the 1930s and the Japanese empire growing. There was also a distinct threat from ?capitalist nations? like America and Britain, who had been notoriously sceptical of communism. This fear pushed Stalin to militarise, purge the party for spies and kept the Russian people loyal to Stalin ? the belief that Stalin was acting to protect Russia from outside influenced allowed the Russian people to explain away Stalin?s merciless behaviour. This fear went hand in hand with the social pressures within Russia, social upheaval experienced through forced collectivisation and industrialisation meant that the state found it harder to keep control of the public. ...read more.

Conclusion

This is a hybrid theory of historical analysis, and was common within the 1990s. This is because it was Stalin?s totalitarian rule and distinct paranoia of his fellow party members which tipped the scales towards The Great Terror, not to forget that it was Stalin?s own signature that appeared on over 600,000 death warrants. Unlike other dictators, like Hitler who had different autonomous factions working under him all vying to earn his approval, Stalin wanted complete control over Russia. He kept involved in all aspect of governing Russia and undercut officials who looked like they were able to sway public opinion. However economic problems also had its influence on the cause of The Terror, they fed into Stalin?s paranoia and need to look successful. Failure within the 5 Year Plans would have opened Stalin up to criticisms from other nations, with paranoia from other strong competing countries which had previously considered Russia as a backwards peasant nation on his heels, Stalin needed to project the image of success; The Terror was a means of scapegoating millions for the lack of productivity and created thousands of expendable workers from the Gulags. In summary, Stalin?s personal insecurities were the main cause of The Terror. Without Stalin at the helm The Great Terror would never had happened, however social pressures, the economy and foreign all fuelled Stalin?s need to motivate Russia ? in which he reacted in the way most close to his nature: violence, fear and control. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How far do you agree that Stalins paranoia was the main cause of the ...

    3 star(s)

    This allowed Stalin to be able to justify the acts of the Great Terror by executing party members. Stalin feared Kirov as he believed that he was a political opponent of his and by him being murdered, it showed the beginning of the purges and Stalin?s paranoia as being a vital reason as to the cause of the Great Terror.

  2. The causes of the show trials and purges of the 1930’s

    everything that was backward in Russia10 and by "categorically refusing" a role that Lenin appointed him to.11 Stalin and his followers made this statements public and before long Trotsky resigned from the Commission of War and took a less prominent role in the government, consequently conceding power to Stalin.12 Later,

  1. To What Extent was Stalin's Personal Paranoia the Main Reason for the Purges?

    Lenin exhibited a fetish for ideological purity and the 'correct line'.5 Pyatakov reportedly said of Lenin 'he would be ready to believe that black was white and white was black if the Party required it'.6 This attitude goes someway towards explaining the attitudes of the accused as Smirnov is recorded

  2. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    What was so controversial about Nolte was that he claimed Nazism and the Holocaust was a "rational response" to the communist threat. This claim caused an outrage because it appeared as if Nolte was condoning the Nazi's, but on the contrary what he was trying to do was make people

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    task that is the concern of every citizen.[21] Many American historians, including Bernard Hutton, saw the purges in a different light. Hutton claimed that the 'actual' reason for the purges was not simply to cleanse the Party of undesirable elements, but instead as a way for Stalin to eliminate anyone

  2. To what extent was German Unification driven by primarily economic forces?

    As the Zollverein was dominated by Prussia, it meant that Prussia had significant sway over the economies of states present in the Zollverein. Throughout the Bund, the German states we using Prussian set currencies and tariffs. This shows that Prussia was economically dominant in the Bund from 1834 up until the formal unification in 1871.

  1. To what extent were economic considerations the main motive for Portuguese exploration and empire ...

    Even though their country had not been long cleared so the Moors the Portuguese were tantalised with the idea of crusading in North Africa to complete this Christian victory. Thought-out the reformation Portugal and Spain had remained Catholic and so when they did take the fight to the Moors they

  2. Nazi consolidation of power in 1933 was primarily due to their use of violence ...

    One event that the Nazis were able to use to their advantage was the Reichstag fire that occurred in February 1933; it allowed them to strengthen their position and therefore advance their consolidation of power. On the 27th of February, it was reported that van der Lubbe, a Dutch communist, was responsible for setting the Reichstag building on fire.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work