• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The handling of the economy was poorly coordinated and this accounts for the weakness in German war production in the years 1939-45. How far do you agree with this view?

Extracts from this document...


?The handling of the economy was poorly coordinated and this accounts for the weakness in German war production in the years 1939-45.? How far do you agree with this view? The Second World War placed enormous strains on the German economy and labour force. Between 1939 and 1941, German military expenditure doubled and by 1941, 55 per cent of the workforce was involved in war-related projects. Despite these efforts, German productivity was disappointing and below that of their enemies. The chaotic organisation and poor co-ordination of the economy undoubtedly hindered the war effort during the years however; it seems inaccurate to argue that this solely accounts for the weakness in German war production. What proved more critical was the lack of raw materials and labour and this was a result of both the shortcomings of Goering (who wasted resources producing ersatz goods when cheaper imports were available) as well as the ideological contradictions of the regime (which meant that women were not initially conscripted and that six million Jews were exempt from contributing to the war effort.) To begin, it is true that the mobilisation of the German economy was marred by inefficiency and poor co-ordination. The pressures resulting from the premature outbreak of war created problems, since many of the major projects were not due to be ready until 1942-3. Further, the regime was unable to establish a clear and authoritative control over the economy. ...read more.


the arms factories, making effective use of concentration camp prisoners as well as preventing skilled workers from being lost to military conscription. Thus, it can be seen that in terms of co-ordination, Speer made a significant improvement in both productivity and this was supported by a leap in military expenditure. It can therefore be argued that it was down to other factors such as the Allied bombing raids, the shortage of raw materials and Hitler?s ideological contradictions that proved more critical to the German war effort. . Crucially, it is argued that Speer?s initiatives were too late and that despite his economic success, Germany probably had the capacity to produce more and could have achieved a level of output close to that of the USSR or the USA. Furthermore, Speer was not always able to counter the power of the Gauleiters at a local level and the SS remained a law unto themselves, especially in the conquered lands. Crucially, the effects of the Allied bombings from 1943 had a detrimental effect on the economy. Germany peaked in the production of weapons in the summer of 1944 due to Speer?s initiatives but the German armed forces could not fully benefit from this because of the effect of Allied air raids. The bombing prevented Germany from further increasing its levels of arms production and caused industrial destruction and the breakdown in communications. ...read more.


The demands of motherhood limited the pool of labour and as many women were already employed in agriculture (and were needed to remain in this sector due to male conscription) there were further limitations on fully exploiting the female labour market. Subsequently, the shortage of labour remained throughout the war and this was not something that even Speer could rectify. In conclusion, it is evident that the German economy did not expand sufficiently to meet the demands of ?total war? and thus war production was weak during the years 1939-45. It is true that the handling of the economy was poorly co-ordinated, particularly during 1939-42, as the chaotic nature of the Nazi state meant that there were a number of rival agencies. However, whilst from 1942 the regime underwent a rationalisation process, fronted by Speer, the underlying problems remained thus limiting the possibilities for economic expansionism. Thus, the fundamental problem which accounts for the weakness in German war production in the years 1939-45 was the both the lack of raw materials and labour. This problem was exacerbated by the fact that conquest did not make up the shortfall in these two essential components of any economy. Finally, there was a conflict between the impulses of an ideologically destructive regime and one in need of economic growth. It is the greatest irony of the Second World War that whilst the Nazi regime scoured Europe looking for labour, it was in the process of murdering six million Jews. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. The outbreak of war in Europe in 1914 was due to an aggressive German ...

    Moreover, Germany had done little to improve it relationships to the other European powers in the early 20 century. Source W pushes this point in stating that Germany had "built a battle fleet aimed at the British", Blackbourn is clearly commenting on the German policy of Flottenpolitik which sought to

  2. Hitlers Germany

    The principal cause of the German defeat in 1918 had been the costly stalemate in World War I, which permitted the Allies to mobilize their superior manpower and resources and overwhelm the Germans. The German strategists therefore determined that in the next war there must not be a stalemate, but

  1. Hitler and the Nazi Regime - revision sheet.

    SS influence was limited pre 1939. 2. concentration camps were not extermination camps pre 1939. 3. understaffed Gestapo was not very efficient at local level. 4. those who disliked the Nazi regime were able to leave Germany Economic Policies The German Economy 1932 depression at its worst, 1933 worldwide economic upturn - lucky.

  2. Vietnam war

    Despite being advised to call up reserves and expand the war, he initiated what was to be the de-escalation of American involvement. The Tet inquiry revealed: 'There can be no assurance that... additional deployment would leave us... in any more favourable military position.'.

  1. The Holocaust was the result of Hitlers long held grand design to pursue a ...

    Consensus Historians argue that Hitler had little to do with the day to day admin of Nazi Germany, and wad became increasingly indifferent toward many of his political roles; State and party bureaucracy usually took initiative in beginning policies to meet Hitler?s ?perceived? wishes.

  2. Albert Speers Role as German Armaments Minister during the War

    Although distressed by Goebbels, Speer couldn?t shake the impression Hitler had left on him, and the following day, 1st March 1931, Speer joined the Nazi Party as member 474 481, however, it could be assumed that due to his gullible nature, it was by accident that he became a Nazi.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    3. 1933 was the worst year for living standards ? popular consumption was lower than in 1900 and consumption of meat was only a third of the 1928 figure. 1. Conditions improved from 1935, with 1937 being the best year for living standards.

  2. Nazi war production in the years 1939-45 was essentially inefficient. How far do you ...

    Although the invasion of the Soviet Union had ideological causes, the destruction of Bolshevism being a central theme in Mein Kampf, there were also very strong economic considerations, not least the desire to control the oil fields in Caucasus. It is believed that if Germany succeeded in capturing the Caucasus

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work