• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The handling of the economy was poorly coordinated and this accounts for the weakness in German war production in the years 1939-45. How far do you agree with this view?

Extracts from this document...


?The handling of the economy was poorly coordinated and this accounts for the weakness in German war production in the years 1939-45.? How far do you agree with this view? The Second World War placed enormous strains on the German economy and labour force. Between 1939 and 1941, German military expenditure doubled and by 1941, 55 per cent of the workforce was involved in war-related projects. Despite these efforts, German productivity was disappointing and below that of their enemies. The chaotic organisation and poor co-ordination of the economy undoubtedly hindered the war effort during the years however; it seems inaccurate to argue that this solely accounts for the weakness in German war production. What proved more critical was the lack of raw materials and labour and this was a result of both the shortcomings of Goering (who wasted resources producing ersatz goods when cheaper imports were available) as well as the ideological contradictions of the regime (which meant that women were not initially conscripted and that six million Jews were exempt from contributing to the war effort.) To begin, it is true that the mobilisation of the German economy was marred by inefficiency and poor co-ordination. The pressures resulting from the premature outbreak of war created problems, since many of the major projects were not due to be ready until 1942-3. Further, the regime was unable to establish a clear and authoritative control over the economy. ...read more.


the arms factories, making effective use of concentration camp prisoners as well as preventing skilled workers from being lost to military conscription. Thus, it can be seen that in terms of co-ordination, Speer made a significant improvement in both productivity and this was supported by a leap in military expenditure. It can therefore be argued that it was down to other factors such as the Allied bombing raids, the shortage of raw materials and Hitler?s ideological contradictions that proved more critical to the German war effort. . Crucially, it is argued that Speer?s initiatives were too late and that despite his economic success, Germany probably had the capacity to produce more and could have achieved a level of output close to that of the USSR or the USA. Furthermore, Speer was not always able to counter the power of the Gauleiters at a local level and the SS remained a law unto themselves, especially in the conquered lands. Crucially, the effects of the Allied bombings from 1943 had a detrimental effect on the economy. Germany peaked in the production of weapons in the summer of 1944 due to Speer?s initiatives but the German armed forces could not fully benefit from this because of the effect of Allied air raids. The bombing prevented Germany from further increasing its levels of arms production and caused industrial destruction and the breakdown in communications. ...read more.


The demands of motherhood limited the pool of labour and as many women were already employed in agriculture (and were needed to remain in this sector due to male conscription) there were further limitations on fully exploiting the female labour market. Subsequently, the shortage of labour remained throughout the war and this was not something that even Speer could rectify. In conclusion, it is evident that the German economy did not expand sufficiently to meet the demands of ?total war? and thus war production was weak during the years 1939-45. It is true that the handling of the economy was poorly co-ordinated, particularly during 1939-42, as the chaotic nature of the Nazi state meant that there were a number of rival agencies. However, whilst from 1942 the regime underwent a rationalisation process, fronted by Speer, the underlying problems remained thus limiting the possibilities for economic expansionism. Thus, the fundamental problem which accounts for the weakness in German war production in the years 1939-45 was the both the lack of raw materials and labour. This problem was exacerbated by the fact that conquest did not make up the shortfall in these two essential components of any economy. Finally, there was a conflict between the impulses of an ideologically destructive regime and one in need of economic growth. It is the greatest irony of the Second World War that whilst the Nazi regime scoured Europe looking for labour, it was in the process of murdering six million Jews. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How far do you agree that the collectivisation of agriculture made an essential contribution ...

    It was at it worse during 1932-1933 when famine hit these Soviet Republics particularly hard.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    In January 1940 the plans for operation "Yellow" fell by accident into Belgian hands and had to be recast completely. Meanwhile, Hitler's attention was drawn to an operation suggested by the naval command, namely, to seize Denmark and Norway as bases for submarine operations against the British navy.

  1. The outbreak of war in Europe in 1914 was due to an aggressive German ...

    in 1912 and was in fact led by the Chancellor Bethmann and his government who had not attended the war council. Therefore to argue that Germany had premeditated plans for war does not appear to be the best argument that they are to blame for the war as the evidence for such a thing seems questionable at best.

  2. Vietnam war

    Thus, it was the unrest generated through an escalation of anti-war protests and division of congress and senators that would lead LBJ to 'back down' and pave the way for the election of Nixon. * The Tet offensive eroded LBJ's political and moral will to continue fighting in Vietnam.

  1. The Holocaust was the result of Hitlers long held grand design to pursue a ...

    however, they argue that the holocaust was not the result of Hitler?s possession of a long held grand design for the Jewish race as argued by the intentionalist school of history. Kershaw denies that Hitler had a master plan, yet promotes the idea of ?No Hitler, no Holocaust?.

  2. Albert Speers Role as German Armaments Minister during the War

    Although distressed by Goebbels, Speer couldn?t shake the impression Hitler had left on him, and the following day, 1st March 1931, Speer joined the Nazi Party as member 474 481, however, it could be assumed that due to his gullible nature, it was by accident that he became a Nazi.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    In the 1920s, communist organisations were relatively new and not well established in the countryside. Collectivisation meant that the party now had an official at each collective and all the peasants were in one place, ready to be influenced. 2.

  2. Nazi war production in the years 1939-45 was essentially inefficient. How far do you ...

    Although the invasion of the Soviet Union had ideological causes, the destruction of Bolshevism being a central theme in Mein Kampf, there were also very strong economic considerations, not least the desire to control the oil fields in Caucasus. It is believed that if Germany succeeded in capturing the Caucasus

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work