• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The importance of the First World War as a turning point in the development of Russian history has been vastly exaggerated. How far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The importance of the First World War as a turning point in the development of Russian history has been vastly exaggerated. How far do you agree with this statement? The First World War was a significant turning point as resulted in the end of three hundred years of Tsarist rule and also led to the world's first communist government. Politically the impact was huge but to evaluate its importance as a turning point in the development of Russian history it needs assessing in terms of its economic and social impacts as well. It also needs evaluating against other key turning points such as the Emancipation edict of 1861, the 1905 revolution, Stalin's rule in the 1920's and also Khrushchev's destalinisation era. As mentioned above the First World War resulted in massive political change. As the patriotism declined due to losses at Tannenburg and Masurian Lakes the Russian population came out against the Tsar who was leading the war at the front. In similar conditions to the 1905 revolution which was in response to the failures of the Russo Jap War the people revolted against the Tsar with strikes and peasant uprisings. The main difference between the two occasions was that the army was on the Tsars side in 1905 but this time they helped lead the revolt with the Duma. ...read more.

Middle

Stolypin's attempt created the richer Kulak class whereas Khrushchev's Virgin Land Campaign had success at the start but by 1960 all the soil had eroded and production was very low. Overall these economic developments had little impact and it was Stalin's five year plans that had the greatest impact in the development of Russian history and therefore on economic terms the First World War has been over exaggerated. Social impacts caused by the World War include the loss of millions of lives, food shortages and a lower standard of living. Over one and a half million people died fighting for Russia in the war and another two million people were captured or seriously injured. This meant that there was a huge fall in Russian population and this made it harder to increase productive capacity back to what it was previously at. There was also a very high ratio of women compared to men which meant that birth rates were low in the next few years. Food shortages were an issue as grain requisition started during the war and continued under Lenin until 1921 when the civil war ended. These impacts are very limited in nature. This contrasts massively with other times during the period. The 1861 emancipation should have been a massive social change. ...read more.

Conclusion

officially but Lenin always had the final say, it was his interpretation of marxism that people followed - NEP was his policy which was largely unpopular and Treaty of Brest Litovsk was his idea Stalin did too - using the cult of personality Next paragraph - Communists more autocratic than Tsars Had more control - totalitarian - due to centralisation - e.g collectivisation - enabled greater control of peasants. Grain requisitioning under Lenin and Stalin - something Tsars would never have dreamt of enforcing - too invasive. But the Communists had greater control over the countryside and the factories More repressive and more successful in being so: Secret police stronger than ever under Lenin and Stalin, great purges Ohkrana small, Cheka large Gulag existed under Stalin and Krushchev (and lenin???) Better at exiling, under Tsars people just came back - Stalin and Lenin did! But under the Communists they eliminated them Better at dealing with opposition - Stalin so paranoid that he assassinated any potential threat - Kirov, Trotsky - but Tsars did not eliminate many potential threats Conclusion Partly agree with the view - but it is not as black and white - Tsars whilst they did show periods in which they were ineffective autocrats, did maintain power quite well considering the size of Russia. However compared to the Communists they were not very effective. Communists much better....... ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does Stalin deserve the title of Red Tsar when assessing his ...

    5 star(s)

    the Seventeenth Party Congress, whilst 1,100 out 1,96631 party delegates were arrested. Although there is much evidence of violence under the Tsars, such as the repression of opposition after the assassination of Alexander II, Stalin is not like a Red Tsar, as Stalin's brutalities surpass and dwarf any under the Tsars.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how the effects of the First World War caused the collapse of the ...

    4 star(s)

    The Provisional Government looked weak because they were unable to defend themselves and the Bolsheviks looked strong because they were prepared to fight. They were also seen as heroes and became very popular. They Provisional Government was unpopular and the Bolsheviks were strong. The Bolsheviks were going to seize power.

  1. Stalin's Impact On Russia And The Russian People.

    By the late 1930s, many Soviet workers had improved their conditions by acquiring well-paid skilled jobs and earning bonuses for meeting targets. Unemployment was almost non-existent. In 1940, education became free and compulsory for all and Stalin invested huge sums in training schemes based in colleges and in the work place.

  2. How far was the First World War the main cause of the fall of ...

    The immense cost of the war led to inflation, as well as these shortages, which made it soar by 300%, and the deprivation created a lot of anger and unrest. Wages rose more slowly than prices, and this lag contributed to the revival of strikes in the capital at the end of 1916.

  1. Why was the Battle of Stalingrad a turning point in the war against ...

    ideologically charged and symbolically important subject that the last word will not be heard for many years." The casualties in the battle of Stalingrad were catastrophic for both sides. The Germans lost 147,000 men and 91,000 were taken prisoner. The Red Army paid a huge price for victory, some half million men were killed in the battle.

  2. Role of Women Under Stalin

    at least in part defined as functions of her performance in the roles of wife and mother." 25 Conclusion In conclusion, the evidence and analysis substantiate the notion that Stalin did not view women as individuals, rather tools that he could utilize to further his position and his goals for Russia.

  1. The Russian Revolution of October 1917 was potentially the most politically formative event of ...

    stage, it was geographically placed to be the centre of a new balance of power. Bismarck then created what is oft referred to as the 'Bismarckian system' - its objective to continue to isolate France and hold friendly relationships with Russia and Austria-Hungary.

  2. How far did government policies change towards agriculture in Russia in the period 1856-1964? ...

    which could lead them to exaggerate their achievements. Nevertheless, the death toll was considerably lower than the 5 million of the 1921 famine. The policies of the Communist government directly helped cause the 1921-22 famine; whereas the Tsarists policies indirectly helped ? the latter doing far more to eradicate it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work