The Iraq crisis - Lies and Deception.

Authors Avatar

Dean Edmunds

The Iraq crisis

Lies and Deception.

Last Saturday 15th February saw more than 6 million people around the world take to the streets, calling for peace not war with Iraq. However their efforts will provoke little change in the policies of George Bush and Tony Blair, who under resolution 1441 still reserve the right to use force in the disarmament of Saddam Hussein. However both leaders still hopefully pursue a peaceful conclusion, and regard war as their last option.

 Although most in the Bush-Blair camp including the leaders themselves are sympathetic to the worries of the peace protesters, it seems there has been a build up of anti-Americanism across Europe, which is fuelling the debate. This hasn’t gone unnoticed by Prime Minister Tony Blair who in an interview with the BBC on Tuesday expressed his concerns. “I urge people to think carefully,” said Mr Blair. “Some of the rhetoric being used is more savage than that used against Saddam”. ”The US is our ally” he urged. Both Blair and Bush have however made it clear that they are undeterred by Saturday’s events and will continue to do what is necessary for the safety of their people and world peace.

 Amateur Interviews aired by American broadcaster Fox News Channel which took place during the protests in New York, showed however that the anti-war protesters couldn’t decide for alternative action in disarming Iraq. Is it the case that perhaps these people haven’t considered this case on its individual merit and have instead jumped to a moral conclusion that war should be avoided? In a post September 11th society, the dangers of not going to war are surely outweighed by the dangers of taking no action at all. This is something echoed by American defence secretary of state Donald Rumsfeld. Rumsfeld is said to keep a book detailing possible risks of a war with Iraq against the risks of failing to take action, which is constantly referred to and updated. His conclusion so far “It would be immoral to do nothing” So can the French and Germans be described as being Immoral? Perhaps irresponsible is better suited. Certainly the French position can be viewed as one of suspicion. To date they maintain a healthy relationship with the Iraqi regime and have recently invested in an oilfield south of Baghdad. They also have a history of aiding the country and there is evidence to suggest they may have gone against UN sanctions from the last Gulf war in doing so.

Join now!

 The Germans continue to maintain an anti-war policy, which is pretty impressive given their history, however both the Germans and French don’t seem to remember the active roll played by the United states in freeing Europe of communism. The German government to live in the knowledge that Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction, and simply hope that he doesn’t use them than support a war on terror. This seems a little naive given that a number of Bin ladens associates, involved in the September 11th attacks on the United States can be traced to an active Al Quieda terrorist cell ...

This is a preview of the whole essay