• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The Leadership of Daniel O'Connell was the main reason for the successful development of constitutional nationalism in the first half of the 19th century." How far would you agree?

Extracts from this document...


"The Leadership of Daniel O'Connell was the main reason for the successful development of constitutional nationalism in the first half of the 19th century." How far would you agree? In the early nineteenth century, there was still prejudice against those of Catholic origin and they were still not given full political rights. Before O'Connell there was a lack of unity and decisiveness of Catholic Ireland so any real chances of success for Catholic Emancipation were always clearly disabled. Yet he came on the scene as a highly educated, and extremely devout Roman Catholic who rejected this lack of enthusiasm. He is remembered as possibly the greatest leader of Irish Nationalism as he was the first to have any real success in elevating the condition of his people. He favoured a more peaceful and compromising approach which led to success with the British Government. O?Connell?s leadership was key to the success of the movement, especially when compared to the leadership of Grattan. His employment of the ?monster meeting? was one of many ways in which he engaged his supporters, especially as he addressed the open air meetings himself, with Adelman and Pearce remarking that his conversational style of oratory enabled him to build up a rapport with the Catholic masses. ...read more.


Simply the events at the time were what allowed constitutional nationalism to flourish. Poor harvests in 1842 led to economic distress throughout Ireland. Admittedly, it was, once again, O?Connell skill as a leader which meant he was able to exploit the situation in order to create a sense of injustice and supplement support for repeal. Lecky describes how he was able to reconcile Catholic Ireland to the idea that constitutional nationalism would solve Ireland's problems, this in turn allowed the movement to develop successfully. Constitutional nationalism's success also depended on the support of the enfranchised 40 shilling freeholders. Through them, O?Connell was able to prove significant electoral support for emancipation and form an embryonic Irish party. Catholic voters had even defied their Protestant landlords to vote for O'Connell in the County Clare by-election which is evidence to Lecky's belief that O'Connell awakened their political conscience, made them believe they could initiate change and encouraged them to vote. Then when their support was lost, after O?Connell?s success during the emancipation campaign led to the disenfranchisement of the 40 shilling freeholders, his electoral following plummeted, forcing him to postpone his goals and compromise. ...read more.


The period between the Act of Union and 1820 saw a lack of Catholic political leadership so when he filled that void, he gave hope and constitutional nationalism thrived. The historian Lecky reinforces this idea by claiming that O'Connell did more than anyone else did for the development of Irish nationalism. The fact that the movement nosedived after his death is testimony to his importance. In O?Connell, the movement found the leader it wanted, and the leader it had never had. His skill in oratory was, while creating rapport with the Catholic masses, to tacitly threaten the British Government with open rebellion. A dangerous but effective policy of brinksmanship won him support among urban and rural Catholics alike. Yet O'Connell's leadership skills would not have been enough without the support of the clergy. The political situation in Britain also had a big influence on the movement's development, when the government was strong it could limit reform; it had to resort to compromise when weaker. Nonetheless, it can be argued that they only achieved as much as the British government wanted them to achieve. So although the leadership of O'Connell was the main reason for constitutional nationalism's success in the mid 19th century, it wasn't the only one. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    He didn't give enough thought to supplies. Living off the land would prove problematic, given the hostile population and their 'scorched earth' policy. * Moore also played Napoleon at his own game. He manoeuvred to try to cut Napoleon's only line of communication back to France.

  2. How far do you agree that Parnell was the most effective leader of Constitutional ...

    In 1823 O'Connell founded the Catholic Association which was an organisation dedicated to fighting for the rights of Catholic people in Ireland. Eventually, O'Connell seized an opportunity to get political representation for his party by running in the County Clare election, which he ended up winning.

  1. Success of Daniel O'Connell's Catholic Emancipation Campaign

    They were alarmed at how much support the Irish was giving O'Connell and that they would want him to take his seat in Westminster. They felt they had a choice of using force or introducing the policy to solve the solution.

  2. How Effectively Did Irish Catholic and Nationalist Leaders Advance Their Cause 1801-1921 ?

    Furthermore after the 1910 election the House of Lords "agreed to bow to the will of the House of Commons and pass the Parliament Bill." 15 This resulted in the Parliament Act of 1911 which meant that the Lords were only able to hold a Bill back for two years before it was passed.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Also a continued rise in the urban population. With the outbreak of war in 1941, conditions for civilians became very tough and rationing was introduced. However, it could be said that the years of terrible living conditions had prepared them for a time like this. Conditions were not as bad as in the Great Famine of 1932.

  2. How far do you agree that the limited appeal of Mazzini's ideas was the ...

    failed to reach out to the peasants and had very little appeal which therefore contributed to the slow progress. Mazzini?s wanted national unify in Italy with one central government and locally elected authorities. However, it is the way he portrayed his ideas which limited his appeal to certain social classes

  1. Lenins leadership was the main reason for the success of the Bolshevik Revolution in ...

    Bolsheviks to seize power in October 1917, and the factor discussed in this paragraph was therefore more of a trigger factor, as Lenin would not have been able to fully and directly express his leadership skills in order to lead his party, had the Tsar been in power, nor would

  2. 1798 Irish Rebellion notes

    A core of such advanced opinion had existed in the organization before its proscription, but government repression gave it the spur it needed. 7. Over the next four years it was restructured as a more disciplined and militarily inclined organization.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work