• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The leadership of Lenin was the main reason why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power in 1917." Use the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this view.

Extracts from this document...


"The leadership of Lenin was the main reason why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power in 1917." Use the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this view. I agree with this statement to a certain extent. There were however other factors helping him to seize the power. I agree with it because Lenin was an effective public speaker, practical and determined. He was aware of how important his role was and was seen as an inspiration to many people. Lenin knew how to gain popularity and used effective slogans such as 'Peace! Bread! Land!' in April 1917, which appealed to the bulk of the population of Russia as the army wanted 'Peace!' and the peasants and workers wanted 'Bread!' and 'Land!' He was dedicated and committed in his work and an example of this was making sure the Bolsheviks attended all parties. He realised that the Bolsheviks stood a better chance of completing their goal if they worked alone as a party and so Lenin refused co-operation with the Provisional Government. ...read more.


He was an effective military leader and was in control of the Red Army and the Petrograd Soviet. He was also in charge of the Military Revolutionary Committee and organised weapons for the Bolsheviks, which had been given to them (but never taken back) by Kerensky so the Provisional Government could be defended from the Kornilov Revolt. Trotsky also drew up the plans for the revolution. In Source F we are told Trotsky was the main reason for the power seize shown in 'Trotsky, not Lenin, planned and organised how the Bolsheviks seized power', and when we are told that 'Lenin arrived at the Bolshevik headquarters in disguise and when some people recognised him he hid' it gives me the impression that Lenin was not as brave and inspirational as he is often seen but afraid of being found. This shows that Trotsky was important in the Bolsheviks seizing power. The Provisional Government was another factor that influenced the Bolsheviks in taking power. ...read more.


In Source C the Provisional Government's unpopularity is mentioned again as shown in, 'food and fuel remained in short supply. Now the people desperately wanted the war to end.' Therefore this shows that the unpopularity of the Provisional Government was an important factor influencing the Bolsheviks seizing power in 1917. The war helped the Bolsheviks seize power as everyone wanted it to end. The war had resulted in hunger in the cities as transport was disrupted and Lenin was offering 'Peace!' which basically said that the Bolsheviks would end the war if they were in power. The Provisional Government then lost support of the army, which was their only defence against attacks, and this ultimately led to their downfall thereby proving the war played an important role in the Bolsheviks seizing power. Although Lenin played a crucial role in the Bolsheviks seizing power he was not the main reason, because if the other factors were not present at the same time then I do not believe he would have been successful in getting power, and therefore I disagree with the statement. Sarah Fotheringham LVL ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Why did the Bolsheviks seize power in 1917?

    The provisional government blamed the small revolutionary parties and particularly the Bolsheviks for stirring unrest. The government ordered the arrest of leading Bolsheviks and those who were not captured were forced into hiding. As a result of the fears aroused by the July days the provisional government was reorganised under

  2. Russia, 1905 - 1917, The Causes of Revolutionary Change. Using your knowledge of the ...

    Lenin accepted this plea and the private army of the Bolsheviks (the Red Guard) was given Petrograd's weapons.

  1. "Why were the Bolsheviks able to seize power in Oct/Nov of 1917

    He was an excellent planner - solely planning the October Revolution and he was also a brilliant organizer and orator, bringing crucial skills to the party. These two men gave the party all that it needed in the sections of leadership, propaganda, planning, and carrying out actions - the were

  2. Lenin's leadership was the main reason why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power ...

    Therefore, Lenin?s role in the revolution can be interpreted as more of a trigger factor then the main factor of the October Revolution. Another reason that allowed the Bolsheviks to seize power in October 1917 was the strengths of the Bolshevik Party themselves.

  1. The Bolsheviks were able to seize power in October 1917 mainly because of the ...

    One of the major weaknesses of the Provisional government was its lack of credibility and authority. For the masses of Russian people the provisional government did not bring immediate change. They were unable to distinguish themselves from the government of the Tsar; in fact many in the government were also

  2. Lenins leadership was the main reason for the success of the Bolshevik Revolution in ...

    he have able to gain the support of the people or the means by which to seize power had it not been for the mistakes of the Provisional Government. The failures of the Provisional Government to deal with Russia?s social and economic problems, including their inability to end the war

  1. 'Stalin's leadership was the most significant reason for Soviet victory over Germany in the ...

    But they were poorly trained and had a lack of high quality weapons. They also did not have clear tasks and were poorly led at first. However, the Soviets had reinforcements in the form of money, planning and leadership. Zhukov was introduced and put a million more men in the Battle of Kursk.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    7. Population bombarded with constant propaganda. Nationalities: In 1939, almost 100 million out of 170 million Soviet citizens were not Russian. The USSR was made up of many states, Ukraine, Georgia and more. In theory they could leave the federation if they wanted to do so, but in practice it was harder as Stalin? exercise control from the centre.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work