• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The main cause of the American civil war was undeniably slavery". Assess the accuracy of this opinion on the causes of the outbreak of the American civil war.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The main cause of the American civil war was undeniably slavery". Assess the accuracy of this opinion on the causes of the outbreak of the American civil war. There has been endless debate over the causation of the American civil war. Many different types of historians have argued for and against slavery being the main cause. Elbert B. Smith wrote, "Slavery worked itself into a constitutional dilemma and became a symbol of disunion which must be destroyed for the salvation of America itself". Other than Slavery there was also sectionalism, politics (which includes the original constitution), abolitionists, and Westward expansion. These have all been argued for main importance. Was sectionalism the product of slavery or did sectionalism go deeper rooted into American society? Slavery was undeniably at the heart of sectionalism. Slavery divided the two sections. Slavery was the most clear-cut distinction between north and south, it had political, economical, social, moral and ideological ramifications. Alexander Stephens stated that it was the "cornerstone" of the confederacy. Slavery was the main feature for the growth of sectionalism as it directed the sections into accentuating the cultural differences. It led northern and southern people into stereotyping each other; to northerners, southerners were backward and to southerners, northerners were revolutionaries. ...read more.

Middle

But this, accompanied by the economical inferiority in the south starts to reveal some reason for the intense friction. Historians have emphasised and some tried to diminish the extent of economical differences in sectionalism. For example B. Collins stated that the economic differences of north and south were minimal if any. Alternatively Charles Beard stated, "The periphery of the industrial vortex of the northeast was daily enlarging...area of virgin soil open to exploitation by planters was diminishing". He is suggesting here that industry was increasing in the north and agriculture was slowing as a result in the south. Friction increased as the south started to loose grip of the Senate and northern politicians dominated. The differences in agriculture was also massive, Kenneth M. Stampp stated, "Differences in geography, soil, and climate created a different society in the south". This is true because the land in the north was superior for building industry to the south. But also, land in the south was better for farming. So, in reality, because of these different geographical conditions the south developed into a society with different and distinct culture. Sectionalism encompasses a massive difference economically, socially, and agriculturally, it is from these reasons that it can be suggested that sectionalism was very important in the causation of the civil war. ...read more.

Conclusion

(Alan Farmer) A quote from a newspaper at the time, "The Harper's ferry invasion has advanced the cause of disunion more than any other event has...since the formation of...government". The event heightened paranoia and increased tension until one ignition would cause civil war. This cause was not mainly over slavery itself, but over the politics of slavery. The final blow came when Abraham Lincoln was elected as the first Republican President of the United States. It was the last straw for the south and precipitated a secession crisis with the 'deep south' states deciding immediately to leave the Union, followed later by the other southern states to form the confederacy under the leadership of Jefferson Davies. Civil War had begun. In conclusion, there is no doubt that slavery played a massive role in the causation of the civil war. It does not seem that slavery is the singular reason for war. Sectionalism played an important role, the differences in soil, climate and culture suggested from the start that something would polarise them. The politicians at the time were trying to fight an impossible battle to save the country from war; if it was not slavery then something else would have separated them. Although slavery made the battle in politics more intense, it was not the singular cause. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Could the American War of Independence Have Been Avoided?

    All of these gave the different colonies a meeting point and allowed them to unite against Britain. Another long-term cause was the physical distance which made communication difficult as it took weeks to pass messages between countries. Also the time difference was a factor.

  2. Why did the South lose the American Civil War?

    However, it was even less popular in the Confederate states as it was a 'Rich man's war, poor man's fight' with the $300 exemption that was available if you could afford it, and also that it contradicted the idea of individual liberty.

  1. What were the Main Causes of the Cold War? and Which of these Causes ...

    To answer the second part of the Essay title, which of these causes can be seen as the specific starting point to the Cold War? I will now analyse which of the named causes should be seen as the true starting point to what is now commonly known as the Cold War.

  2. World War I: Could it have been avoided?

    This proved deadly when all of Europe entered into a World War on July 25, 1914 when Austria declared war with Serbia becuase Serbia did not comply with all of Austria's demands in an ultimatum (Gibson, 13). By attacking Serbia, Austria brought Russia in the war due an alliance created between the two countries (Perry, 512).

  1. To what extent were germany to blame for the outbreak of ww1

    They believed that by mobilising Germany had in affect declared war. I would strongly agree with this. I am aware, however some historians would disagree as in the 1920's and 1930's the idea of a more general responsibility gained ground in both political and academic cities.

  2. How substantial were the differences between the North and South on the eve of ...

    of businesses that provided services for the slave south, including textile factories, a meat processing industry, insurance companies, shippers, and cotton brokers. But the North had grown to be more industrial. Its climate and terrain was generally unsuitable for slavery (cotton plantations), and it was more concerned by European immigration, its associated problems of crime.

  1. Introduction to American drama.

    In 1921 these two recent immigrants, alleged to be anarchists, were found guilty of murder on the flimsiest of evidence and were executed six years later. The 1920s became known as the 'Roaring Twenties'. It was the Jazz Age, the era of the 'flapper' (young women who flouted conventions), mass

  2. Vietnam War.

    The South Vietnamese claimed the enemy death toll to be 97,000. Controversy in the United States Before troop withdrawal, US military strength in South Vietnam had peaked at over 541,000 in 1969. In the United States itself, as military involvement increased, the war issue had increasingly became highly controversial.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work