• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The main reason for the failure of the second crusade was the lack of a clear and unified command structure. How far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The main reason for the failure of the second crusade was the lack of a clear and unified command structure. How far do you agree with this statement? It is without question that the Second Crusade suffered from a lack of a clear and unified command structure as the two main leaders, Louis VII of France and Conrad III of Germany, were unable to cooperate in a cohesive manner. However, it was not the only reason for the failure of the crusade as there were a myriad of other factors such as the lack of clear aims and the problems associated with the method of travel chosen by the crusaders. Arguably, the lack of a clear and unified command structure was inevitable from the inception of the crusade as Bernard of Clairvaux's success in Germany meant that there were to be two separate armies marching on the Holy Land- a situation which is both logistically demanding and likely to breed a lack of focus. An important element in the success of the First Crusade was the fact that there were no monarchs involved-the vast majority of the crusaders were humble people fuelled by religious fervour and the promise of the afterlife. ...read more.

Middle

Both theatres of conflict haemorrhaged resources such as food, men and transport which could have been used more effectively on the second crusade and enabled the crusaders to further establish a foothold in the Holy Land- rather than greedily pillage and loot Eastern Europe and Portugal. It is undoubtedly true that the primary reasons for crusader involvement in these conflicts was the promise of riches and the opportunity to march on the enemies of God in an area closer to home- a cause which was significantly less important than the defence of the Crusader states, and indicative of the lack of focus displayed by the crusaders during this period. In particular, the resources wasted in the Reconquista would have been massively useful in the Second Crusade as a fleet of 150-200 English vessels involved in the Reconquista could have been used to aid the crusaders on their journey to the Holy Land- providing supplies, carrying the wounded, and even transporting some of the fighting forces themselves. Though it is true that the decision to assist in the Reconquista rather than the Second Crusade was the decision of the particular crusaders who travelled there, had there been a clear command ...read more.

Conclusion

There were in fact no redeeming features of the decision to travel by land as it did nothing but weaken an already disorganised and bloated army which had a distinct lack of focus. Had the crusaders decided to travel by sea they would have been in a far stronger position from which to take back Edessa and repel the Muslim forces in the East. However, the decision to travel by land was merely a symptom of more fundamental flaws in the preparation for the second crusade and that single factor cannot be held solely responsible for the ultimate failure of the crusade. Had the crusaders been organised in a cohesive way with a clear and unified command structure it is almost certain that the Second Crusade would have been a more focussed endeavour with a clear set of aims and a strong sense of purpose. Overall, it is clear that the Second Crusade failed due to the combination of a myriad of circumstances; however, the lack of a clear and unified command structure was the main contributor to a significant amount of these issues and thus one can draw the conclusion that it was the main reason for the ultimate failure of the crusade. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. 'Collectivisation was a political success but an economic failure and a human disaster'

    The apparent success could be put down to fear and intimidation rather than genuine support or belief in collectivisation. In the end, collectivisation did lead to more efficient farming and increased production, but in the short term it involved Stalin in a 'war' with the kulaks, and a disastrous fall in output, which led to famine.

  2. Why did the Second Crusade Fail?

    Although this crusade was called in 1145 they had failed to reach the Middle East until 1147, (in which) some crusaders were ambushed by the Muslims. The crusaders then fought their way across Anatolia and onwards to Antioch. They had taken a massive blow of attacks and suffered a shortage

  1. Lenins Economic Policies lacked consistency in the period 1918-1924. How far would you ...

    This is the second economic policy that Lenin introduced. Basically this policy saw the Bolsheviks attempt to bring everything under the control of the government, which the people did not want, they still wanted to have a certain amount of freedom.

  2. Cities were the main driving force of the Reformation in Germany(TM) " explain whether ...

    It can be argued that the peasants were never a driving force behind the Reformation, they only supported Luther up to 1525 and then abandoned Lutheranism. Hence they therefore did not play such an important part in the spreading of Lutheranism compared to the cities due to the printing presses and high literacy rates.

  1. How important was the discovery of the Holy Lance in the Crusader success in ...

    Whilst it is unquestionable that the discovery of the Holy Lance had a great impact on the morale of the Crusaders and was a decisive factor in the

  2. Robespierre fell when the Terror had outlived its usefulness- How far do you agree ...

    France had become more stable, and to achieve this ultimately Robespierre, the figurehead of the terror had to

  1. The First English Civil War

    every man should be free to take his part in what was thought to be the supreme trial of strength. On the 26 August, all being ready, Essex started. Through Aylesbury and round the north side of Oxford to Stow-on-the-Wold, the army moved resolutely, not deterred by want of food

  2. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    It showed the League?s altered stance, as they previously supported British rule to safeguard Muslim interests. During the First World War, the Indian army fought in every major theatre of operations and with the British claiming that ?they stood for the protection of democracy around the world,?[14] the Indians sought democracy for their own country.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work