• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The main reason for the failure of the second crusade was the lack of a clear and unified command structure. How far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The main reason for the failure of the second crusade was the lack of a clear and unified command structure. How far do you agree with this statement? It is without question that the Second Crusade suffered from a lack of a clear and unified command structure as the two main leaders, Louis VII of France and Conrad III of Germany, were unable to cooperate in a cohesive manner. However, it was not the only reason for the failure of the crusade as there were a myriad of other factors such as the lack of clear aims and the problems associated with the method of travel chosen by the crusaders. Arguably, the lack of a clear and unified command structure was inevitable from the inception of the crusade as Bernard of Clairvaux's success in Germany meant that there were to be two separate armies marching on the Holy Land- a situation which is both logistically demanding and likely to breed a lack of focus. An important element in the success of the First Crusade was the fact that there were no monarchs involved-the vast majority of the crusaders were humble people fuelled by religious fervour and the promise of the afterlife. ...read more.

Middle

Both theatres of conflict haemorrhaged resources such as food, men and transport which could have been used more effectively on the second crusade and enabled the crusaders to further establish a foothold in the Holy Land- rather than greedily pillage and loot Eastern Europe and Portugal. It is undoubtedly true that the primary reasons for crusader involvement in these conflicts was the promise of riches and the opportunity to march on the enemies of God in an area closer to home- a cause which was significantly less important than the defence of the Crusader states, and indicative of the lack of focus displayed by the crusaders during this period. In particular, the resources wasted in the Reconquista would have been massively useful in the Second Crusade as a fleet of 150-200 English vessels involved in the Reconquista could have been used to aid the crusaders on their journey to the Holy Land- providing supplies, carrying the wounded, and even transporting some of the fighting forces themselves. Though it is true that the decision to assist in the Reconquista rather than the Second Crusade was the decision of the particular crusaders who travelled there, had there been a clear command ...read more.

Conclusion

There were in fact no redeeming features of the decision to travel by land as it did nothing but weaken an already disorganised and bloated army which had a distinct lack of focus. Had the crusaders decided to travel by sea they would have been in a far stronger position from which to take back Edessa and repel the Muslim forces in the East. However, the decision to travel by land was merely a symptom of more fundamental flaws in the preparation for the second crusade and that single factor cannot be held solely responsible for the ultimate failure of the crusade. Had the crusaders been organised in a cohesive way with a clear and unified command structure it is almost certain that the Second Crusade would have been a more focussed endeavour with a clear set of aims and a strong sense of purpose. Overall, it is clear that the Second Crusade failed due to the combination of a myriad of circumstances; however, the lack of a clear and unified command structure was the main contributor to a significant amount of these issues and thus one can draw the conclusion that it was the main reason for the ultimate failure of the crusade. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Why did the Second Crusade Fail?

    The crusaders decided to capture Damascus instead, which defeats the "reclaiming Edessa" goal completely. Thus, this can be called the Second Crusade's main failure.

  2. Why did so many people go on the first crusade

    As this was one of Urban's main selling points for the crusades, it must be the case that many of the people who went on the crusade were simply defending the Christians in the east from the Turks. One of Urban II targets at Clermont had been stop Christians

  1. To what extent was strong leadership the main reason for the success of the ...

    dissolved and would have most likely have turned against each other and their Eastern allies.

  2. 'Collectivisation was a political success but an economic failure and a human disaster'

    Stalin also ensured he maintained popularity by placing the blame for the harsher measures on minor party officials; in his 'dizzy with success' speech he blamed over enthusiastic activists for the slaughter and called a temporary halt to collectivisation, making himself seemed concerned about the welfare of peasants as well as shifting the fault.

  1. The First English Civil War

    The troops from Ireland, thus obtained at the cost of an enormous political blunder, proved to be untrustworthy after all. Those serving in Hopton's army were "mutinous and shrewdly infected with the rebellious humour of England". When Waller's Londoners surprised and routed a Royalist detachment at Alton on the 13 December 1643, half the prisoners took the Covenant.

  2. Cities were the main driving force of the Reformation in Germany(TM) " explain whether ...

    who worked the land were under considerable financial pressure and had to pay considerable amounts to the Roman Catholic Church, therefore by converting to Lutheranism, peasants could save money. Therefore there were reasons as to why the peasants did take up Luther's beliefs; however not all were necessarily religious ones.

  1. To what extent could the Crusades be described as failure within the years 1095-1195?

    They had no more combat ready troops. O a few powerful fortresses in the north: Crac de Chevalier, Blanc Chatel and Margat, remained in the hands of Crusaders. A Second Crusade was a total failure. Due to Muslim counter-attack the county of Edessa was lost. This happened due to failure of Crusader states to cooperate and organize help between each other.

  2. Maos Leadership was the crucial factor in the Communists winning the 1945 Civil War. ...

    Mao?s leadership was built upon many morals and policies which ensured his control and kept his rule just and stable. He was idolised by many of the Chinese because of his guidance and help during the trials of the Long March.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work